journal article·2009-07

On the shock compression of polycrystalline metals

N. K. Bourne, J. C. F. Millett, G. T. Gray

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

At the present time, materials are being considered for use in increasingly extreme environments; extreme in terms of both the magnitude of the imposed pressures and stresses they encounter and the speed of the loading applied. Recent advances in understanding the continuum behaviour of condensed matter have been made using novel loading and ultrafast diagnostics. This insight has indicated that in the condensed phase, the response is driven by the defect population existing within the microstructure which drives plastic flow in compression as well as damage evolution and failure processes. This article discusses shock compression results, focusing upon research conducted on cubic-structured metals but also giving an overview of results on hexagonal-close-packed (HCP) metals and alloys. In the past, shock physics has treated materials as homogeneous continua and has represented the compressive behaviour of solids using an adaptation of solid mechanics. It is clear that the next generation of constitutive models must treat physical mechanisms operating at the micro- and mesoscale to adequately describe metals for applications under extreme environments. Derivation of such models requires idealized modes of loading which limits the range of hydrostatic or impact driven experimental techniques available to four principle groups. These are laser-induced plasma loading, Z pinch devices, compressed gas and powder-driven launchers and energetic drives and diamond anvil cells (DACs). Whilst each technique or device discussed brings unique advantages and core competencies, it will be shown that launchers are most capable of covering the spectrum of important and relevant mechanisms since only they can simultaneously access the material microstructural 'bulk' dimensions and timescales that control behaviour observed at the continuum. Shock experiments on a selection of metals whose response is regarded as typical are reviewed in this article, and sensors and techniques are described that allow the interpretation of the compression that results from idealized step loading on a target. Real-time imaging or X-ray techniques cannot at present access bulk states at the correct microstructural resolution, over a macroscopic volume or at rates that would reveal mechanisms occurring. It is controlled recovery experiments that provide the link between the microstructure and the continuum state that facilitates understanding of the effect of mesoscale properties upon state variables. Five metals are tracked through various shock-loading techniques which show the following characteristic deformation features; a low Peierls stress and easy slip allow FCC materials to develop dislocation cells and work-harden during the shock process, whereas the higher resistance to dislocation motion in BCC-structured materials and the lower symmetry in HCP metals slows the development of the microstructure and favours deformation twinning as an additional deformation mechanism to accommodate shock compression. Thus not only energy thresholds, but also operating kinetics, must be understood to classify the response of metals and alloys to extreme loading environments. Typical engineering materials possess a baseline microstructure but also a population of defects within their volumes. It is the understanding of these statistical physical relationships and their effects upon deformation mechanisms and defect storage processes that will drive the development of materials for use under extreme conditions in the future. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Energetic Materials and Combustion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Meyers MA, Aimone CT (1982) J Met 35:A55
2. Hopkinson B (1905) Proc R Soc Lond 74:49810.1098/rspl.1904.0145 ↗
3. Hopkinson B (1914) Proc R Soc Lond A 89:41110.1098/rspa.1914.0008 ↗
4. Hopkinson J (1872) Proc Manch Lit Philos Soc 11:40
5. Armstrong RW, Walley SM (2008) Int Mater Rev 53(3):10510.1179/174328008X277795 ↗
6. Field JE, Walley SM, Bourne NK, Huntley JM (1994) J Phys IV France Colloq C8 (DYMAT 94) 4:3
7. Edwards M (2006) Mater Sci Technol 22:45310.1179/174328406X84102 ↗
8. Tresca H (1878) Proc Inst Mech Eng 30:30110.1243/PIME_PROC_1878_029_017_02 ↗
9. Barré de Saint Venant AJC (1883) Théorie de l’Élasticité des Corps Solides de Clebsch. Dunod, Paris, p 480a–d (final note to para 60)
10. Orowan E (1946) Trans Inst Eng Shipbuild Scotl 89:165
11. Taylor GI (1946) J Inst Civil Eng 26:48610.1680/ijoti.1946.13699 ↗
12. Whiffin AC (1948) Proc R Soc Lond A 194:30010.1098/rspa.1948.0082 ↗
13. Kolsky H (1949) Proc Phys Soc Lond B 62B:67610.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
14. Gray GT III (2000) In: ASM handbook, mechanical testing and evaluation. ASM International, Materials Park, OH, p 462
15. Pisarenko GS, Krasowsky AY, Vainshtock VA, Kramerenko IV, Krasiko VN (1987) Eng Fract Mech 28:53910.1016/0013-7944(87)90051-8 ↗
16. Meyers MA, Subhash G, Kad BK, Prasad L (1994) Mech Mater Sci Technol 17:17510.1016/0167-6636(94)90058-2 ↗
17. Steinberg DJ, Lund CM (1989) J Appl Phys 65(4):152810.1063/1.342968 ↗
18. Hoge KG, Mukherjee AK (1977) J Mater Sci 12:1666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0054281810.1007/BF00542818 ↗
19. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1987) J Appl Phys 61(5):189610.1063/1.338024 ↗
20. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1990) J Appl Phys 68(4):58010.1063/1.346636 ↗
21. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1992) Acta Metall Mater 40:180310.1016/0956-7151(92)90166-C ↗
22. Follansbee PS (1986) In: Murr LE, Staudhammer K, Meyers MA (eds) Metallurgical applications of shock-wave and high-strain-rate phenomena. Marcel Dekker, p 451
23. Follansbee PS, Gray GT III (1991) Int J Plast 7:65110.1016/0749-6419(91)90049-5 ↗
24. Follansbee PS, Kocks UF (1988) Acta Metall Mater 36(1):8110.1016/0001-6160(88)90030-2 ↗
25. Regazzoni G, Kocks UF, Follansbee PS (1987) Acta Metall Mater 35(12):286510.1016/0001-6160(87)90285-9 ↗
26. Preston DL, Tonks DL, Wallace DC (2003) J Appl Phys 93:21110.1063/1.1524706 ↗
27. Rosenfield AR, Votava E, Hahn GT (1968) In: Ductility. American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, p 63
28. Wright TW (2002) The physics and mathematics of adiabatic shear bands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Asay JR, Hall CA, Konrad CH, Trott WM, Chandler GA, Fleming KJ, Holland KG, Chhabildas LC, Mehlhorn TA, Vesey R, Trucano TG, Hauer A, Cauble R, Foord M (1999) Int J Impact Eng 23:2710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00059-7 ↗
30. Armstrong RW, Arnold W, Zerilli FJ (2007) Metall Mater Trans A 38A(11):260510.1007/s11661-007-9142-5 ↗
31. Esquivel EV, Murr LE (2006) Mater Sci Technol 22(4):43810.1179/174328406X91186 ↗
32. Schneider MS, Kad B, Kalantar DH, Remington BA, Kenik E, Jarmakani H, Meyers MA (2005) Int J Impact Eng 32:47310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.05.010 ↗
33. Bacon DJ, Vitek V (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 33(3):72110.1007/s11661-002-0138-x ↗
34. Feng C, Murr LE, Niou CS (1996) Metall Mater Trans A 27(7):177310.1007/BF02651926 ↗
35. Hines JA, Vecchio KS (1997) Acta Mater 45:63510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00193-0 ↗
36. Arnold W, Held M, Stilp AJ (1990) In: Schmidt SC, Johnson JN, Davidson LW (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter—1989. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 421
37. Johnson JN (1981) J Appl Phys 52:281210.1063/1.329011 ↗
38. Johnson JN (1982) In: Nellis WJ, Seaman L, Graham RA (eds) Shock waves in condensed matter—1981. American Institute of Physics, New York, p 438
39. Davison LW, Graham RA (1979) Phys Rep 55:25510.1016/0370-1573(79)90026-7 ↗
40. Rose MF, Berger TL, Inman MC (1967) Trans Metall Soc AIME 239:1998
41. Kressel H, Brown N (1967) J Appl Phys 38:161810.1063/1.1709733 ↗
42. Grace FI (1969) J Appl Phys 40:264910.1063/1.1658048 ↗
43. Murr LE, Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf D (1978) Acta Metall 26:84710.1016/0001-6160(78)90034-2 ↗
44. Wright RN, Mikkola DE (1982) Mater Sci Eng 53:27310.1016/0025-5416(82)90061-1 ↗
45. Greulich F, Murr LE (1979) Mater Sci Eng 39:8110.1016/0025-5416(79)90172-1 ↗
46. Gray GT III (1992) In: Meyers MA, Murr LE, Standhammer KP (eds) Shock-wave and high strain rate phenomena in materials. Marcel Deker, New York, p 899
47. Meyers MA, Kestenbach HJ, Soares CAO (1980) Mater Sci Eng 45:14310.1016/0025-5416(80)90220-7 ↗
48. Murr LE, Huang J-Y (1975) Mater Sci Eng 19:11510.1016/0025-5416(75)90014-2 ↗
49. Walsh JM, Rice MH, McQueen RG, Yarger FL (1957) Phys Rev 108:19610.1103/PhysRev.108.196 ↗
50. Rohde RW, Towne TL (1971) J Appl Phys 42:87810.1063/1.1660115 ↗
51. Furnish MD, Chhabildas LC, Steinberg DJ (1994) Dynamical behaviour of tantalum. American Institute of Physics, New York, p 1099
52. Mitchell AC, Nellis WJ (1981) J Appl Phys 52:336310.1063/1.329160 ↗
53. Furnish MD, Lassila DH, Chhabildas LC, Steinberg DJ (1996) In: Schmidt SC, Tao WC (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter—1995. AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, p 527
54. Fiske PS, Holmes N, Lassila D (1999) In: Khan AS (ed) Plasticity 99: constitutive and damage modelling of inelastic deformation and phase transformation, Neat Press, Fulton, MD, p 639
55. Gray GT III, Vecchio KS (1995) Metall Mater Trans A 26A:255510.1007/BF02669413 ↗
56. Gray GT III (1990) In: Schmidt SC, Johnson JN, Davison LW (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter—1989. North-Holland, Amsterdam, p 407
57. Murr LE, Meyers MA, Niou C-S, Chen YJ, Pappu S, Kennedy C (1997) Acta Mater 45:15710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00145-0 ↗
58. Hsiung LM, Lassila DH (1998) Scr Mater 38:137110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00049-9 ↗
59. Kear BH, Wilsdorf HGF (1962) Trans Metall Soc AIME 224:382
60. Sizek HW, Gray GT (1993) Acta Metall Mater 41:185510.1016/0956-7151(93)90205-7 ↗
61. Gray GT III (1993) In: Schmidt SC, Samara GA, Ross M (eds) High pressure science and technology. AIP Press, Colorado Springs, CO, p 1161
62. Albert DE, Gray GT (1994) Philos Mag A 70:14510.1080/01418619408242542 ↗
63. Kasantseva NV, Greenberg BA, Popov AA, Shorokhov EV (2003) J Phys IV 110:923
64. Geng HY, Chen NX, Sluiter MHF (2005) Phys Rev B 71:01210510.1103/PhysRevB.71.012105 ↗
65. Kim Y-W (1991) Mater Res Symp Proc 213:77710.1557/PROC-213-777 ↗
66. Maloy SA, Gray GT (1996) Acta Mater 44:174110.1016/1359-6454(95)00329-0 ↗
67. Gardiner P, Miguelez H, Cortes R, LePetitcorps Y, Dodd B, Navarro C (1997) J Phys IV Colloq C3:593
68. Gray GT III (1994) J Phys IV Colloq C8:373
69. Jones IP, Hutchinson WB (1981) Acta Metall 29:95110.1016/0001-6160(81)90049-3 ↗
70. Peters JO, Ritchie RO (2000) Eng Fract Mech 67:19310.1016/S0013-7944(00)00045-X ↗
71. Thompson SR, Ruschau JJ, Nicholas T (2001) Int J Fatigue 23:540510.1016/S0142-1123(01)00166-9 ↗
72. Ruschau JJ, Nicholas T, Thompson SR (2001) Int J Impact Eng 25:23310.1016/S0734-743X(00)00044-0 ↗
73. Kad BK, Schoenfeld SE, Burkins MS (2002) Metall Mater Trans A 33A:93710.1007/s11661-002-0163-9 ↗
74. Kad BK, Schoenfeld SE, Burkins MS (2002) Mater Sci Eng A322:24110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01135-2 ↗
75. Schoenfeld SE, Kad BK (2002) Int J Plast 18:46110.1016/S0749-6419(01)00005-5 ↗
76. Gray GT III, Morris CE (1988) In: Sixth world conference on titanium, France, p 269
77. Rosenberg Z, Mebar Y, Yaziv D (1981) J Phys D Appl Phys 14:26110.1088/0022-3727/14/2/018 ↗
78. Dandekar DP, Spletzer SV (2000) In: Furnish MD, Chhabildas LC, Hixson RS (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter 1999. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, p 427
79. Razorenov SV, Kanel GI, Utkin AV, Bogach AA, Burkins M, Gooch WA (2000) In: Furnish MD, Chhabildas LC, Hixson RS (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter—1999. AIP Press, Melville, NY, p 415
80. Church PD, Andrews T, Bourne NK, Millett JCF (2001) In: Furnish MD, Thadhani NN, Horie Y (eds) Shock compression of condensed matter 2001. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, p 511
81. Tyler C, Millett JCF, Bourne NK (2006) In: Furnish MD (ed) Shock compression of condensed matter—2005. AIP Press, Melville, NY, p 674
82. Greeff CW, Trinkle DR, Albers RC (2001) J Appl Phys 90:222110.1063/1.1389334 ↗
83. Millett JCF, Whiteman G, Bourne NK (2008) J Appl Phys 104(7):07353110.1063/1.2991164 ↗
84. Millett JCF, Meziere YJE, Bourne NK (2007) J Mater Sci 42:5941. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1716-510.1007/s10853-007-1716-5 ↗
85. Gray GT III, Bourne NK, Millett JCF (2003) J Appl Phys 94:643010.1063/1.1620679 ↗
86. Millett JCF, Meziere YJE, Gray GT, Cerreta EK, Bourne NK (2006) J Appl Phys 100:06350610.1063/1.2347806 ↗
87. Millett JCF, Bourne NK, Gray GT III, Jones IP (2002) Acta Mater 50:480110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00345-2 ↗
88. Kalantar DH, Belak JF, Collins GW, Colvin JD, Davies HM, Eggert JH, Germann TC, Hawreliak J, Holian BL, Kadau K, Lomdahl PS, Lorenzana HE, Meyers MA, Rosolankova K, Schneider MS, Sheppard J, Stolken JS, Wark JS (2005) Phys Rev Lett 95(7):07550210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.075502 ↗
89. Bridgman PW (1931) The physics of high pressure. Bell, London
90. McMillan PF (2005) Nat Mater 4(10):71510.1038/nmat1488 ↗
91. Rosenberg Z, Bourne NK, Millett JCF (2007) Meas Sci Technol 18:184310.1088/0957-0233/18/7/007 ↗
92. Barker LM, Hollenbach RE (1972) J Appl Phys 43:466910.1063/1.1660986 ↗
93. Bourne NK (1999) In: Cameron IG (ed) New models and numerical codes for shock wave processes in condensed media. AWE Hunting Brae, Aldermaston, Berkshire, UK, p 237
94. Dandekar DP, Weisgerber WJ (1999) Int J Plast 15:129110.1016/S0749-6419(99)00041-8 ↗
95. Clifton RJ, Klopp RW (1985) In: Metals handbook. American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, p 230
96. Asay JR, Chhabildas LC, Dandekar DP (1977) Bull Am Phys Soc 24:712
97. Lipkin J, Asay JR (1977) J Appl Phys 48:18210.1063/1.323306 ↗
98. Chhabildas LC, Wise JL, Asay JR (1981) Bull Am Phys Soc 26:666
99. Huang H, Asay JR (2006) J Appl Phys 100:04351410.1063/1.2266234 ↗
100. Brar NS, Bless SJ (1992) High Press Res 10:77310.1080/08957959208225330 ↗