journal article·2018-10

Compressive strain rate dependence and constitutive modeling of closed-cell aluminum foams with various relative densities

Lin Jing, Xingya Su, Fei Yang, Hongwei Ma, Longmao Zhao

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 53· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

The dynamic compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum foams with different relative densities at a wide range of strain rates up to 4000 s−1 was investigated using a 37-mm Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus. The 30-mm-diameter specimens with two thicknesses (i.e., 6 and 10 mm) and three nominal relative densities (i.e., 0.11, 0.16, and 0.21) were fabricated. The influences of strain rate, relative density, specimen thickness on the mechanical properties of aluminum foams (e.g., stress–strain relationship, collapse stress, plateau stress, densification strain, and energy absorption) were examined. The results indicate that the collapse stress, plateau stress, and densification strain of the aluminum foams with three relative densities exhibit obvious strain rate sensitivity. The collapse stress and plateau stress have a stronger density sensitivity and relatively weaker strain rate sensitivity. The specimen thickness has a very slight influence on the specimen strength at a lower strain rate (600 s−1), but this leads to a greater influence at a higher strain rate (2000 s−1). The energy absorption capacity of the closed-cell aluminum foams increases with increased relative density and strain rate in both quasi-static and dynamic compression. Finally, a multiparameter nonlinear elasto-plastic constitutive model was proposed to describe the typical three-stage features of stress–strain response in aluminum foams. There was acceptable agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu G, Yu TX (2003) Energy absorption of structures and materials. Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Cambridge10.1533/9781855738584 ↗
2. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: A design guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
3. Wang DQ, Xue WW, Meng XJ, Shi ZY (2005) Cell structure and compressive behavior of an aluminum foam. J Mater Sci 40:3475–3480. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/84/1/012054/meta10.1007/s10853-005-2852-4 ↗
4. Zheng ZJ, Wang CF, Yu JL, Reid SR, Harrigan JJ (2014) Dynamic stress-strain states for metal foams using a 3D cellular model. J Mech Phys Solids 72:93–11410.1016/j.jmps.2014.07.013 ↗
5. Linul E, Marsavina L, Kovacik J (2017) Collapse mechanisms of metal foam matrix composites under static and dynamic loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng, A 690:214–22410.1016/j.msea.2017.03.009 ↗
6. Hanssen AG, Enstoc L, Langseth M (2002) Close-range blast loading of aluminum foam panels. Int J Impact Eng 27:593–61810.1016/S0734-743X(01)00155-5 ↗
7. Jing L, Wang ZH, Shim VPW, Zhao LM (2014) An experimental study of the dynamic response of cylindrical sandwich shells with metallic foam cores subjected to blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 71:60–7210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.03.009 ↗
8. Zhu F, Zhao LM, Lu GX, Wang ZH (2008) Deformation and failure of blast-loaded metallic sandwich panels-Experimental investigations. Int J Impact Eng 35:937–95110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.11.003 ↗
9. Li ZQ, Xi CQ, Jing L, Wang ZH, Zhao LM (2014) Effect of loading rate on the compressive properties of open-cell metal foams. Mater Sci Eng, A 592:221–22910.1016/j.msea.2013.11.011 ↗
10. Li P, Petrinic N, Siviour CR (2012) Finite element modelling of the mechanism of deformation and failure in metallic thin-walled hollow spheres under dynamic compression. Mech Mater 54:43–5410.1016/j.mechmat.2012.06.002 ↗
11. Amsterdam E, Onck PR, Hosson JTHMDE (2005) Fracture and microstructure of open cell aluminum foam. J Mater Sci 40:5813–5819. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20080012810.1007/s10853-005-4995-8 ↗
12. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Int J Impact Eng 24:277–29810.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
13. Daniel RA, Cluff SE (2008) Prediction of the effect of artificial aging heat treatment on the yield strength of an open-cell aluminum foam. J Mater Sci 43:1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2271-910.1007/s10853-007-2271-9 ↗
14. Liu YD, Yu JL, Zheng ZJ, Li JR (2009) A numerical study on the rate sensitivity of cellular metals. Int J Solids Struct 46:3988–399810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.07.024 ↗
15. Elnasri I, Pattofatto S, Zhao H, Tsitsiris H, Hild F, Girard Y (2007) Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part I Experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 55:2652–267110.1016/j.jmps.2007.04.005 ↗
16. Pattofatto S, Elnasri I, Zhao H, Tsitsiris H, Hild F, Girard Y (2007) Shock enhancement of cellular structures under impact loading: part II analysis. J Mech Phys Solids 55:2672–268610.1016/j.jmps.2007.04.004 ↗
17. Ajdari A, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2011) Dynamic crushing and energy absorption of regular, irregular and functionally graded cellular structures. Int J Solids Struct 48:506–51610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.10.018 ↗
18. Mukai T, Kanahashi K, Miyoshi T et al (1999) Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scripta Mater 40:921–92710.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X ↗
19. Kiernan S, Cui L, Gilchrist M (2009) Propagation of a stress wave through a virtual functionally graded foam. Int J Non-Linear Mech 44:456–46810.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.02.006 ↗
20. Karagiozova D, Langdon GS, Nurick GN (2012) Propagation of compaction waves in metal foams exhibiting strain hardening. Int J Solids Struct 49:2763–277710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.012 ↗
21. Beckmann C, Hohe J (2016) A probabilistic constitutive model for closed-cell foams. Mech Mater 96:96–10510.1016/j.mechmat.2016.01.016 ↗
22. Avalle M, Belinggardi G, Ibba A (2007) Mechanical models of cellular solids: parameters identification from experimental tests. Int J Impact Eng 34:3–2710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.012 ↗
23. Warren WE, Kraynik AM (1991) The nonlinear elastic behavior of open-cell foams. J Appl Mech 58:376–38110.1115/1.2897196 ↗
24. Warren WE, Kraynik AM (1997) Linear elastic behavior of a low-density kelvin foam with open cells. J Appl Mech 64:787–79410.1115/1.2788983 ↗
25. Zhu HX, Mills NJ, Knott JF (1997) Analysis of the high strain compression of open-cell foams. J Mech Phys Solids 45:1875–190410.1016/S0022-5096(97)00027-6 ↗
26. Fan JH, Zhang JJ, Wang ZH, Li ZQ, Zhao LM (2013) Dynamic crushing behavior of random and functionally graded metal hollow sphere foams. Mater Sci Eng, A 561:352–36110.1016/j.msea.2012.10.026 ↗
27. Zhang XY, Tang LQ, Liu ZJ, Jiang ZY, Liu YP, Wu YD (2017) Yield properties of closed-cell aluminum foam under triaxial loadings by a 3D Voronoi model. Mech Mater 104:73–8410.1016/j.mechmat.2016.10.007 ↗
28. Song YZ, Wang ZH, Zhao LM, Luo J (2010) Dynamic crushing behavior of 3D closed-cell foams based on Voronoi random model. Mater Des 31:4281–428910.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.007 ↗
29. Peroni M, Solomos G, Pizzinato V (2013) Impact behaviour testing of aluminium foam. Int J Impact Eng 53:74–8310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.002 ↗
30. Zhang J, Kikuchi N, Li VC, Yee AF, Nusholtz G (1998) Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading. Int J Impact Eng 21:369–38610.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0 ↗
31. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Isotropic models for metallic foams. J Mech Phys Solids 48:1253–128310.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
32. Cooper GJ, Townsend DJ, Cater SR, Pearce BP (1991) The role of stress waves in thoracic visceral injury form blast loading: modification of stress transmission by foams and high-density materials. J Biomech 24:272–28510.1016/0021-9290(91)90346-O ↗
33. Zhu F, Chou CC, Yang KH (2011) Shock enhancement effect of lightweight composite structures and materials. Compos B 42:1202–121110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.014 ↗
34. Chen YM, Das R, Battley M (2017) Effects of cell size and cell wall thickness variations on the strength of closed-cell foams. Int J Eng Sci 120:220–24010.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.08.006 ↗
35. Aldoshan A, Khanna S (2017) Effect of relative density on the dynamic compressive behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng, A 689:17–2410.1016/j.msea.2017.01.100 ↗
36. Raj RE, Parameswaran V, Daniel BSS (2009) Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng, A 526:11–1510.1016/j.msea.2009.07.017 ↗
37. Andrews E, Sanders W, Gibson LJ (1999) Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams. Mater Sci Eng, A 270:113–12410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-7 ↗
38. Guo YB, Gao GF, Jing L, Shim VPW (2017) Response of high-strength concrete to dynamic compressive loading. Int J Impact Eng 108:114–13510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.04.015 ↗
39. Li QM, Magkiriadies I, Harrigan JJ (2006) Compressive strain at the onset of densification of cellular solids. J Cell Plast 42:371–39210.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
40. Ravichandran G, Subhash G (1994) Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Am Ceram Soc 77:263–26710.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x ↗
41. Shim VPW, Tay BY, Stronge WJ (1990) Dynamic crushing of strain-softening cellular structures-a one-dimensional analysis. J Eng Mater Technol 112:398–40510.1115/1.2903349 ↗
42. Zhao H, Elnasri I, Li HJ (2006) The mechanism of strength enhancement under impact loading of cellular materials. Adv Eng Mater 8:877–88310.1002/adem.200600069 ↗
43. Reid SR, Peng C (1997) Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. Int J Impact Eng 19:531–57010.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
44. Reid SR, Bell WW (1984) Response of one-dimensional metal ring systems to end impact. Inst Phys Conf Ser 70:471–478
45. Irausquin I, Perez-Castellanos JL, Miranda V, Teixeira-Dias F (2013) Evaluation of the effect of the strain rate on the compressive response of a closed-cell aluminium foam using the split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Mater Des 47:698–70510.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.050 ↗
46. Wang ZH, Jing L, Zhao LM (2011) Elasto-plastic constitutive model of aluminum alloy foam subjected to impact loading. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 21:449–45410.1016/S1003-6326(11)60735-8 ↗
47. Liu QL, Subhash G, Gao XL (2005) A parametric study on crushability of open-cell structural polymeric foams. J Porous Mater 12:233–24810.1007/s10934-005-1652-1 ↗