Effects of Sr-modification, iron-based intermetallics and aging treatment on the impact toughness of 356 Al–Si–Mg alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Impact toughness as a property has been acquiring increased importance in recent years, since data regarding this property can provide a means for assessing alloy ductility under high rates of deformation. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of Sr-modification, Fe-based intermetallic phases and aging conditions on the impact toughness of widely used 356 alloys. The total absorbed energy was measured using a computer-aided instrumented Instron Charpy impact testing machine. Increasing the level of iron additions decreases the impact energy values of 356 alloys to a noticeable degree (~35–57%). The addition of 0.1 wt% Mn to non-modified 356 alloys seems to have no observable effect on the impact energy, while increasing the Mn addition to 0.4 wt% produces a slight improvement in the impact energy values for non-modified and Sr-modified 356 alloys compared to that of those containing only iron under the same conditions. The application of solution heat treatment in combination with Sr-modification was found to significantly improve the impact energy of as-cast 356 alloys, particularly at low iron additions. Artificial aging of non-modified and Sr-modified 356 alloys at 180 °C diminishes the impact energy values with an increase in the aging time up to 8 h compared to those obtained under the solution heat-treated conditions. On the other hand, aging at 220 °C for 12 h increases the impact energy values of Sr-modified 356 alloy containing 0.12 wt% Fe and combined 0.2 wt% Fe–0.1 wt% Mn to about 20 and 18 J, respectively. The fracture behavior of non-modified 356 alloys containing 0.12 wt% Fe is mainly controlled by the acicular eutectic Si particles whereas β-iron platelets act as crack initiation sites and provide further path for final crack propagation in non-modified 356 alloys containing 0.9 wt% Fe. The β-iron platelets and π-iron phase particles contribute largely to crack initiation and propagation in the Sr-modified 356 alloys containing 0.9 wt% Fe.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Doty HW (1996) J Mater Sci 31:5529. doi: 10.1007/BF0115932710.1007/BF01159327 ↗
2. Bäckerud L, Chai G, Tamminen J (1990) Solidification characteristics of aluminum alloys. Vol. 2: foundry alloys. AFS/Skanaluminium, Des Plaines, IL, p 71
3. Taylor JA Cooperative report, research center for cast metals manufacturing (CAST). University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, p 1
4. Paray F, Gruzleski JE (1994) Cast Met 7(1):2910.1080/09534962.1994.11819161 ↗
5. Martin JW, Doherty RD (1997) Stability of microstructure in metallic systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 23910.1017/CBO9780511623134 ↗
6. El Sebaie O, Samuel FH, Samuel AM, Doty HW (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 480(1–2):34210.1016/j.msea.2007.07.039 ↗
7. Taylor JA, StJohn DH, Barresi J, Couper MJ (2000) Mater Sci Forum 331–337:27710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.331-337.277 ↗
8. Taylor A, StJohn DH, Zheng LH, Barresi J, Couper MJ (2001) Alum Trans 4–5:111
9. Wang QG, Davidson CJ (2001) J Mater Sci 36:739. doi: 10.1023/A:100480132755610.1023/A:1004801327556 ↗
10. Ma Z, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Doty HW, Valtierra S (2002) AFS Trans Paper 03–101:1
11. Sigworth G, Apelian D, Shivkumar S (1989) AFS Trans 97:811
12. Shivkumar S, Wang L, Keller C (1994) J Mater Eng Perform 3:8310.1007/BF02654503 ↗
13. Merlin M, Timelli G, Bonollo F, Garagnani GL (2009) J Mater Process Technol 209:106010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.027 ↗
14. Gruzleski JE, Closset BM (1990) The treatment of liquid aluminum–silicon alloys. American Foundrymen’s Society, Des Plaines, IL, p 74
15. Zhang DL, Zheng LH, StJohn DH (2002) J Light Met 2:710.1016/S1471-5317(02)00010-X ↗
16. Dieter GE (1986) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw Hill, UK, p 241
17. Smallman RE, Ngan AHW (2007) Physical metallurgy and advanced materials. Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, p 38510.1016/B978-075066906-1/50010-X ↗
18. Nakayama Y, Ninomiya K, Ohnishi N (1998) J Jap Inst Light Met 48(7):34010.2464/jilm.48.340 ↗
19. Tsukuda M, Koike S, Harada M (1978) J Jap Inst Light Met 28(1):810.2464/jilm.28.8 ↗
20. Sreeja Kumari SS, Pillai RM, Pai BC (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 460–461:56110.1016/j.msea.2007.01.082 ↗
21. Sreeja Kumari SS, Pillai RM, Pai BC (2002) Indian Found J 48(1):27
22. Awano Y, Shimizu Y (1990) AFS Trans 98:889
23. Murali S, Raman KS, Murthy KSS (1994) Int J Cast Met Res 6(4):18910.1080/09534962.1994.11819149 ↗
24. Wang QG, Cáceres CH (1998) Mater Sci Eng A A241:7210.1016/S0921-5093(97)00476-0 ↗
25. Brooks CR, Choudhury A (1993) Metallurgical failure analysis. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
26. Ran G, Zhou JE, Wang QG (2008) J Mater Process Technol 207:4610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.050 ↗