Mechanical characterisation of polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 for hydrogen storage applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs) are currently attracting interest due to their unusual combination of high surface areas and capability to be processed into free-standing films. However, there has been little published work with regards to their physical and mechanical properties. In this paper, detailed characterisation of PIM-1 was performed by considering its chemical, gas adsorption and mechanical properties. The polymer was cast into films, and characterised in terms of their hydrogen adsorption at -196 °C up to much higher pressures (17 MPa) than previously reported (2 MPa), demonstrating the maximum excess adsorbed capacity of the material and its uptake behaviour in higher pressure regimes. The measured tensile strength of the polymer film was 31 MPa with a Young's modulus of 1.26 GPa, whereas the average storage modulus exceeded 960 MPa. The failure strain of the material was 4.4%. It was found that the film is thermally stable at low temperatures, down to -150 °C, and decomposition of the material occurs at 350 °C. These results suggest that PIM-1 has sufficient elasticity to withstand the elastic deformations occurring within state-of-the-art high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks and sufficient thermal stability to be applied at the range of temperatures necessary for gas storage applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Jena P (2011) Materials for hydrogen storage: past, present, and future. J Phys Chem Lett 2(3):206–21110.1021/jz1015372 ↗
2. Schlapbach L, Zuttel A (2001) Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. Nature 414(6861):353–35810.1038/35104634 ↗
3. Service RF (2004) The hydrogen backlash. Science 305(5686):958–96110.1126/science.305.5686.958 ↗
4. Nijkamp MG, Raaymakers JEMJ, van Dillen AJ, de Jong KP (2001) Hydrogen storage using physisorption-materials demands. Appl Phys A 72(5):619–62310.1007/s003390100847 ↗
5. Zuttel A (2003) Materials for hydrogen storage. Mater Today 6(9):24–3310.1016/S1369-7021(03)00922-2 ↗
6. Weitkamp J, Fritz M, Ernst S (1995) Zeolites as media for hydrogen storage. Int J Hydrogen Energ 20(12):967–97010.1016/0360-3199(95)00058-L ↗
7. Strobel R, Garche J, Moseley PT, Jorissen L, Wolf G (2006) Hydrogen storage by carbon materials. J Power Sources 159(2):781–80110.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.047 ↗
8. Rosi NL, Eckert J, Eddaoudi M et al (2003) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 300(5622):1127–112910.1126/science.1083440 ↗
9. McKeown NB, Budd PM, Book D (2007) Microporous polymers as potential hydrogen storage materials. Macromol Rapid Commun 28(9):995–100210.1002/marc.200700054 ↗
10. McKeown NB, Gahnem B, Msayib KJ et al (2006) Towards polymer-based hydrogen storage materials: engineering ultramicroporous cavities within polymers of intrinsic microporosity. Angew Chem Int Ed 45(11):1804–180710.1002/anie.200504241 ↗
11. McKeown NB (2012) Polymers of instrinsic miscroporosity. ISRN Mater Sci 2012:1–1610.5402/2012/513986 ↗
12. McNaught AD, Wilkinson A, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1997) Compendium of chemical terminology: IUPAC recommendations, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford
13. Ahn J, Chung WJ, Pinnau I et al (2010) Gas transport behavior of mixed-matrix membranes composed of silica nanoparticles in a polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1). J Membr Sci 346(2):280–28710.1016/j.memsci.2009.09.047 ↗
14. Bushell AF, Attfield MP, Mason CR et al (2013) Gas permeation parameters of mixed matrix membranes based on the polymer of intrinsic microporosity PIM-1 and the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-8. J Membr Sci 427:48–6210.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.035 ↗
15. Gonciaruk A, Althumayri K, Harrison WJ, Budd PM, Siperstein FR (2015) PIM-1/graphene composite: a combined experimental and molecular simulation study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 209:126–13410.1016/j.micromeso.2014.07.007 ↗
16. von Helmolt R, Eberle U (2007) Fuel cell vehicles: status 2007. J Power Sources 165(2):833–84310.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.12.073 ↗
17. International Standard Organization (2009) Gaseous hydrogen and hydrogen blends—land vehicle fuel tanks. ISO/TS 15869
18. Budd PM, Elabas ES, Ghanem BS et al (2004) Solution-processed, organophilic membrane derived from a polymer of intrinsic microporosity. Adv Mater 16(5):456–45910.1002/adma.200306053 ↗
19. Song J, Du N, Dai Y et al (2008) Linear high molecular weight ladder polymers by optimized polycondensation of tetrahydroxytetramethylspirobisindane and 1,4-dicyanotetrafluorobenzene. Macromolecules 41(20):7411–741710.1021/ma801000u ↗
20. Du N, Robertson GP, Pinnau I, Guiver MD (2010) Polymers of intrinsic microporosity with dinaphthyl and thianthrene segments. Macromolecules 43:8580–858710.1021/ma101930x ↗
21. Song QL, Cao S, Pritchard RH et al (2014) Controlled thermal oxidative crosslinking of polymers of intrinsic microporosity towards tunable molecular sieve membranes. Nat Commun 5:481310.1038/ncomms5813 ↗
22. Budd PM, Butler A, Selbie J et al (2007) The potential of organic polymer-based hydrogen storage materials. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9(15):1802–180810.1039/b618053a ↗
23. British Standards Institution (1996) Plastics—determination of tensile properties. Part 3: Test conditions for films and sheets. BS EN ISO 527-3
24. British Standards Institution (2014) Plastics—test specimens. Types of test specimen and their dimensions: reduced-scale test specimens. BS EN ISO 20753
25. British Standards Institution (2010) Determination of the specific surface area of solids by gas adsorption—BET method. ISO 9277
26. Rouquerol J, Llewellyn P, Rouquerol F (2006) Is the BET equation applicable to microporous adsorbents? Stud Surf Sci Catal 160:49–5610.1016/S0167-2991(07)80008-5 ↗
27. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV et al (2015) Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem 87(9–10):1051–106910.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
28. Rouquerol FO, Rouquerol J, Sing KSW, Llewellyn PL, Maurin G (2014) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 237–268
29. Bimbo N, Ting VP, Hruzewicz-Kolodziejczyk A, Mays TJ (2011) Analysis of hydrogen storage in nanoporous materials for low carbon energy applications. Faraday Discuss 151:59–7410.1039/c0fd00010h ↗
30. Budd PM, Ghanem BS, Makhseed S et al (2004) Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): robust, solution-processable, organic nanoporous materials. Chem Commun 2:230–23110.1039/b311764b ↗
31. Brydson JA (1999) Plastics materials, 7th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
32. Whitney W, Andrews RD (1967) Yielding of glassy polymers—volume effects. J Polym Sci Part 16:2981–299010.1002/polc.5070160552 ↗
33. Johnson DJ (1987) Structure property relationships in carbon-fibers. J Phys D 20(3):286–29110.1088/0022-3727/20/3/007 ↗
34. Byun Y, Whiteside S, Thomas R et al (2012) The effect of solvent mixture on the properties of solvent cast polylactic acid (PLA) film. J Appl Polym Sci 124(5):3577–358210.1002/app.34071 ↗
35. Sukhareva LA, Legonkova OA, Yakovlev VS (2008) Polymers for packaging and containers in food industry introduction. New concepts in polymer science. Taylor & Francis Group, Boston10.1163/ej.9789004161436.i-526 ↗