Comparison of the influence of copper micro- and nano-particles on the mechanical properties of polyethylene/copper composites
Source abstract
Abstract
This article reports on the influence of copper content and particle size on the tensile properties of low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) mixed with up to 25 vol.% Cu micro-particles and up to 5 vol.% Cu nano-particles, and on the influence of Cu micro-particle content on the dynamic mechanical properties of these polymers. This influence depends upon the extent of branching and crystallinity in the particular polymer. The copper micro-particles seemed to have a negligible influence on the tensile strength of LDPE and HDPE, while there was quite a significant reduction in tensile strength when LLDPE was used as matrix. The elongation at break generally decreased with increasing copper content, but the effect was more significant in the case of LDPE and HDPE. The tensile modulus generally increased with increasing Cu content, but the extent of increase was lower in the case of the more crystalline HDPE. The nano-copper containing samples showed comparable properties at equivalent Cu contents. The storage and loss moduli generally increased with increasing Cu. For all three polyethylenes the β-transition (where present) was not significantly influenced by the presence and amount of copper, but the α-transition was strongly influenced, especially in the case of LDPE and LLDPE.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Long Y, Shanks RA (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 61:187710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960912)61:11<1877::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
2. Bartczak Z, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M (1999) Polymer 40:234710.1016/S0032-3861(98)00444-3 ↗
3. Misra RKD, Nerikar P, Bertrand K, Murphy D (2004) Mater Sci Eng A 384:28410.1016/S0921-5093(04)00833-0 ↗
4. Unal H, Mimaroglu A, Alkan M (2004) Polym Int 53:5610.1002/pi.1246 ↗
5. Takahara A, Magome T, Kajiyama T (1994) J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 32:83910.1002/polb.1994.090320507 ↗
6. Dibenedetto AT (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 302:7410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01357-5 ↗
7. Lebaron PC, Wang Z, Pinnavaia TJ (1999) Appl Clay Sci 15(1–2):1110.1016/S0169-1317(99)00017-4 ↗
8. Molefi JA, Luyt AS, Krupa I (2009) eXPRESS Polym Lett 3(10):63910.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.80 ↗
9. Krupa I, Novák I, Chodák I (2004) Synth Met 145:24510.1016/j.synthmet.2004.05.007 ↗
10. Gungor A (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 99:243810.1002/app.22637 ↗
11. Krupa I, Chodák I (2001) Eur Polym J 37:215910.1016/S0014-3057(01)00115-X ↗
12. Krupa I, Miková G, Novák I, Janigová I, Nógellová Z, Lednický F, Prokeš J (2007) Eur Polym J 43:240110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.03.033 ↗
13. Luyt AS, Molefi JA, Krump H (2006) Polym Degrad Stabil 91:162910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.014 ↗
14. Rusu M, Sofian N, Rusu D (2001) Polym Test 20:40910.1016/S0142-9418(00)00051-9 ↗
15. Nurazreena, Hussain LB, Ismail H, Mariatti M (2006) J Thermoplast Comp Mater 19(4):41310.1177/0892705706062197 ↗
16. Tan S, Zhang M, Rong M, Zeng H (2004) Polym Comp 20(3):40610.1002/pc.10366 ↗
17. Turi EA (1997) Thermal characterization of polymer materials, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
18. Ward IM (1971) Mechanical properties of solid polymers, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
19. Sirotkin RO, Brooks NW (2001) Polymer 42:980110.1016/S0032-3861(01)00535-3 ↗
20. Menard KP (1999) Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA10.1201/9781420049183 ↗