Grain refinement in nanostructured Al–Mg alloys subjected to high pressure torsion
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanostructures of three binary Al–Mg alloys and a commercial AA5182 alloy subjected to high pressure torsion at room temperature were comparatively investigated using transmission electron microscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray line profile analysis. Grain size distributions, dislocation densities, and densities of planar defects including stacking faults and microtwins were quantified. The average subgrain size decreased considerably from 120 to 55 nm as the Mg content increased from 0.5 to 4.1 wt%. The average dislocation density in the alloys first increased to a maximum and then decreased as the Mg content increased and the average subgrain size decreased. The role of Mg solute on these features and the refinement mechanisms associated with the typical nanostructures and faults were interpreted.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Valiev RZ, Zehetbauer MJ, Estrin Y, Höppel HW, Ivanisenko Y, Hahn H, Wilde G, Roven HJ, Sauvage X, Langdon TG (2007) Adv Eng Mater 9:52710.1002/adem.200700078 ↗
2. Valiev RZ, Islamgaliev RK, Alexandrov IV (2000) Prog Mater Sci 45:10310.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
3. Valiev R (2004) Nat Mater 3:51110.1038/nmat1180 ↗
4. Valiev RZ, Estrin Y, Horita Z, Langdon TG, Zehetbauer MJ, Zhu YT (2006) JOM 58:3310.1007/s11837-006-0213-7 ↗
5. Liu MP, Roven HJ, Murashkin M, Valiev RZ (2009) Mater Sci Eng A 503:12210.1016/j.msea.2008.02.053 ↗
6. Liao XZ, Huang JY, Zhu YT, Zhou F, Lavernia EJ (2003) Philos Mag 83:306510.1080/1478643031000152799 ↗
7. Meng QP, Rong YH, Hsu TY (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 471:2210.1016/j.msea.2007.02.125 ↗
8. Liu MP, Roven HJ, Yu YD (2008) Int J Mater Res 98:184
9. Liu MP, Roven HJ, Yu YD, Werenskiold JC (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 483–484:59
10. Chandler HD, Bee JV (1987) Acta Metall 35:250310.1016/0001-6160(87)90147-7 ↗
11. Liu MP, Roven HJ (2007) Appl Phys Lett 90:08311510.1063/1.2696540 ↗
12. Olmsted DL, Hector LG Jr, Curtin WA (2006) J Mech Phys Solids 54:176310.1016/j.jmps.2005.12.008 ↗
13. Liu MP, Roven HJ, Murashkin M, Valiev RZ (2008) Mater Sci Forum 579:14710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.579.147 ↗
14. Ungár T (2007) J Mater Sci 42:1584. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0696-110.1007/s10853-006-0696-1 ↗
15. Shen TD, Schwarz RB, Feng S, Swadener JG, Huang JY, Tang M, Zhang JZ, Vogel SC, Zhao YS (2007) Acta Mater 55:500710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.018 ↗
16. Xue Q, Liao XZ, Zhu YT, Gray GT III (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 410–411:25210.1016/j.msea.2005.08.022 ↗
17. Tao NR, Wu XL, Sui ML, Lu J, Lu K (2004) J Mater Res 19:162310.1557/JMR.2004.0227 ↗
18. Ni H, Alpas AT (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 361:33810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00530-6 ↗