Mechanical behaviors of hierarchical cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio
Source abstract
Abstract
An investigation of the mechanical behaviors on hierarchical re-entrant honeycomb structures was undertaken using finite element method. The hierarchical structure with a hierarchy order n (n ≥ 1) was constructed by replacing each vertex of a re-entrant hexagonal structure of hierarchy order n − 1 with a smaller re-entrant hexagon with identical geometry aspect ratio. The Poisson’s ratio and energy absorption capacity of re-entrant structures of different hierarchy orders were studied under various compression velocities. The minimum Poisson’s ratios of the first-order (n = 1) and second-order (n = 2) hierarchical re-entrant structures were − 1.581 and − 1.823, respectively; they were 32.9 and 53.2% lower than that of a zeroth-order hierarchical structure (i.e., conventional re-entrant hexagon). The second-order hierarchical structure exhibited the highest rate of increase in energy absorption capacity with an increasing compression velocity. The plateau stresses of the first- and second-order hierarchical structures were lower than that of the zeroth-order hierarchical structure; however, the second-order hierarchical structure exhibited the highest energy absorption capacity at high compression velocity rate (v > 40 m/s). The energy absorption capacities of the first- and second-order hierarchical structures proposed in the present study are 1.5 and 1.8 times, respectively, higher than those of the hierarchical re-entrant structures proposed in our previous work (Li et al. in Smart Mater Struct 26:025014, 2017).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Li D, Yin J, Dong L, Lakes RS (2017) Numerical analysis on mechanical behaviors of hierarchical cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. Smart Mater Struct 26:02501410.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025014 ↗
2. Lakes RS, Elms KE (1993) Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams. J Compos Mater 27:1193–120210.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
3. Chan N, Evans KE (1998) Indentation resilience of conventional and auxetic foams. J Cell Plast 34:231–26010.1177/0021955X9803400304 ↗
4. Scarpa F, Ciffo LG, Yates JR (2004) Dynamic properties of high structural integrity auxetic open cell foam. Smart Mater Struct 13:49–5610.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
5. Li D, Dong L, Yin J, Lakes RS (2016) Negative Poisson’s ratio in 2D Voronoi cellular solids by biaxial compression: a numerical study. J Mater Sci 51:7029–7037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9992-610.1007/s10853-016-9992-6 ↗
6. Grima JN, Caruana-Gauci R, Dudek MR, Wojciechowski KW, Gatt R (2013) Smart metamaterials with tunable auxetic and other properties. Smart Mater Struct 22:08401610.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084016 ↗
7. Lakes RS (1987) Response: negative Poisson’s ratio materials. Science 238:55110.1126/science.238.4826.551-a ↗
8. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A 382:25–4210.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
9. Kolpakov AG (1985) On the determination of the averaged moduli of elastic gridworks. Prikl Mat Mekh 59:969–977
10. Li D, Yin J, Dong L, Lakes RS (2018) Strong re-entrant cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci 53:3493–3499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1809-810.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
11. Wojciechowski KW (1989) Two-dimensional isotropic system with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Phys Lett A 137:60–6410.1016/0375-9601(89)90971-7 ↗
12. Li D, Ma J, Dong L, Lakes RS (2017) Stiff square structure with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Mater Lett 188:149–15110.1016/j.matlet.2016.11.036 ↗
13. Li D, Ma J, Dong L, Lakes RS (2017) Three-dimensional stiff cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. Phys Status Solidi B. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20160078510.1002/pssb.201600785 ↗
14. Pozniak AA, Smardzewski J, Wojciechowski KW (2013) Computer simulations of auxetic foams in two dimensions. Smart Mater Struct 22:1–1110.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084009 ↗
15. Li D, Dong L, Lakes RS (2016) A bi-material structure with Poisson’s ratio tunable from positive to negative via temperature control. Mater Lett 164:456–45910.1016/j.matlet.2015.11.037 ↗
16. Mousanezhad D, Ebrahimi H, Haghpanah B, Ghosh R, Ajdari A, Hamouda AMS, Vaziri A (2015) Spiderweb honeycombs. Int J Solids Struct 66:218–22710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.036 ↗
17. Mousanezhad D, Babaee S, Ebrahimi H, Ghosh R, Hamouda AS, Bertoldi K, Vaziri A (2015) Hierarchical honeycomb auxetic metamaterials. Sci Rep 5:1830610.1038/srep18306 ↗
18. Gatt R, Mizzi L, Azzopardi JI, Azzopardi KM, Attard D, Casha A, Briffa J, Grima JN (2015) Hierarchical auxetic mechanical metamaterials. Sci Rep 5:839510.1038/srep08395 ↗
19. Sun Y, Pugno N (2013) In plane stiffness of multifunctional hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio sub-structures. Compos Struct 106:681–68910.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.008 ↗
20. Taylor CM, Smith CW, Miller W, Evans KE (2011) The effects of hierarchy on the in-plane elastic properties of honeycombs. Int J Solids Struct 48:1330–133910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.01.017 ↗
21. Taylor CM, Smith CW, Miller W, Evans KE (2012) Functional grading in hierarchical honeycombs: density specific elastic performance. Compos Struct 94:2296–230510.1016/j.compstruct.2012.01.021 ↗
22. Billon K, Zampetakis I, Scarpa F, Ouisse M, Sadoulet-Reboul E, Collet M, Perriman A, Hetherington A (2017) Mechanics and band gaps in hierarchical auxetic rectangular perforated composite metamaterials. Compos Struct 160:1042–105010.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.121 ↗
23. Lakes RS (1993) Materials with structural hierarchy. Nature 361:511–51510.1038/361511a0 ↗
24. Ajdari A, Jahromi BH, Papadopoulos J, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2012) Hierarchical honeycombs with tailorable properties. Int J Solids Struct 49:1413–141910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.029 ↗
25. Oftadeh R, Haghpanah B, Papadopoulos J, Hamouda AMS, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A (2014) Mechanics of anisotropic hierarchical honeycombs. Int J Mech Sci 81:126–13610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.011 ↗
26. Chen Y, Li T, Jia Z, Scarpa F, Yao CW, Wang L (2018) 3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with shape integrity under large compressive deformation. Mater Des 137:226–23410.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.028 ↗
27. Pugno N, Sun Y (2013) Hierarchical fibers with a negative Poisson’s ratio for tougher composites. Materials 6:699–71210.3390/ma6020699 ↗
28. Chen Q, Huang S (2013) Mechanical properties of a porous bioscaffold with hierarchy. Mater Lett 95:89–9210.1016/j.matlet.2012.12.071 ↗
29. Chen Q, Pugno N (2012) In-plane elastic buckling of hierarchical honeycomb materials. Eur J Mech A/Solids 34:120–12910.1016/j.euromechsol.2011.12.003 ↗
30. Zhu HX, Yan LB, Zhang R, Qiu XM (2012) Size-dependent and tunable elastic properties of hierarchical honeycombs with regular square and equilateral triangular cells. Acta Mater 60:4927–493910.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.009 ↗
31. Ashby MF, Evans AG, Fleck NA, Gibson LJ, Hutchinson JW, Wadley HNG (2000) Metal foams: a design guide. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford