Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of laser weld bonding of magnesium alloy to aluminum alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Weldability of magnesium alloy to aluminum alloy in laser weld bonded (LWB) joints was investigated. Results showed that magnesium/aluminum could be easily joined by LWB under proper technological parameters. The weld was characterized by complex vortex flow at the bottom, and there existed intermetallic compound layer between weld pool and lower sheet metal, which was composed of the brittle phases of Al3Mg2 and Al12Mg17, resulting in the formation of weld cracking. Adhesive in the weld was heated up and then escaped in the form of gas, which would not affect the microstructures of weld. However, Adhesive near the weld was oxidized and carbonized, leading to the formation of a failure zone. But this failure zone had little influence on load bearing capability of the joints. Besides, it was also found that the penetration of LWB joints was greater than that of laser welded joints alone. In tensile shear test and T-peel test, LWB samples gave both the highest shear resistance and the highest peel resistance compared to laser welded samples and adhesive bonded samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Schubert E, Klassen M, Zerner I, Walz C, Sepold G (2001) J Mater Process Tech 115:210.1016/S0924-0136(01)00756-7 ↗
2. Lee S, Lee SH, Kim DH (1998) Met Mater Trans A 29A:122110.1007/s11661-998-0249-0 ↗
3. Lehner C, Reinhart G (1999) J Laser Appl 11:20610.2351/1.521865 ↗
4. Mordike BL, Ebert T (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 302:3710.1016/S0921-5093(00)01351-4 ↗
5. Thomas D (1991) Automot Eng 99:47
6. Mehta DS, Masood SH, Song WQ (2004) J Mater Process Tech 155–156:152610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.247 ↗
7. Ramakrishnan S, Koltun P (2004) Resour Conserv Recycl 42:4910.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.003 ↗
8. Friedrich H, Schumann S (2001) J Mater Process Tech 117:27610.1016/S0924-0136(01)00780-4 ↗
9. Marsh G (2003) Mater Today 4:3610.1016/S1369-7021(03)00429-2 ↗
10. Ben-Artzy A, Munitz A, Kohn G, Brining B, Shtechman A (2002) in Magnesium Technology 2002, Kaplan HI (ed) (TMS, 2002) p. 295.
11. Lin W, Shinn B, Reynolds J, Workman D, Denney P, Gould J. In: Ding SX, Tian SH (ed) Proceedings of 2004 International Forum on Welding Technology in Aviation and Space Industries, Beijing, P.R. China, November 2004 (The Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society Welding Institution of CMES, 2004) p 89.
12. Borrisutthekul R, Miyashita Y, Mutoh Y (2005) Sci Technol Adv Mater 6:19910.1016/j.stam.2004.11.014 ↗
13. Iordana N, Emil IG, Cristofor SI (1999) Polym Test 18:41510.1016/S0142-9418(98)00044-0 ↗
14. Fang YP (2002) In: Analysis of properties and defects in laser welding aluminum alloy sheet, MS Thesis. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
15. Heiple CR, Roper JR (1982) Weld J 61:97s
16. Roper JR, Olson DL (1978) Weld J 57:103s
17. Takeuchi Y, Takagi R, Shinoda T (1992) Weld J 71:283s
18. Darwish SM, Al-Samhan AM (2004) J Mater Process Tech 147:5110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.029 ↗
19. Chen D, Cheng S (1983) J Appl Mech 50:10910.1115/1.3166976 ↗
20. Apalak MK, Aldas K, Sen F (2003) J Mater Process Tech 142:110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00279-6 ↗