Mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers with molar ratios of Si/Al ≈ 2 and Na/Al ≈ 1
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical properties of four different types of geopolymers, but of the same composition (Na/Al ≈ 1, Si/Al ≈ 2 molar ratio), made using a combination of precursors, were determined. The four types were: (i) sodium aluminate (NaAlO2/NaOH solution), Ludox (colloidal SiO2 solution) and metakaolin (MK), (SAGP), (ii) NaOH, fumed silica and MK (FSGP), (iii) Ludox, NaOH and MK (LGP) and (iv) commercial sodium silicate and MK (SGP). The highest crushing strength (CCS) value obtained was for SGP (70 MPa) and the lowest value was for SAGP (16 MPa). The highest modulus of rupture (MOR) value obtained was for LGP (9 MPa) and the lowest value was for SAGP (3 MPa). The fracture toughness (K1c) and Young’s modulus (E) showed the same trend. The effect of adding sand (40 wt%) on their mechanical properties was also determined. The K1c values increased up to 65% and E values increased up to 80% compared to samples free of sand. However, CCS and MOR values did not change much and gave mixed results. Overall, porosity is found to be the chief microstructural variable limiting the mechanical properties of the geopolymers. The properties of the geopolymers are compared with those of ordinary Portland cement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Davidovits J (1999) J Therm Anal 37:163310.1007/BF01912193 ↗
2. Davidovits J (1999) In: Davidovits J, Davidovits R, James C (eds) Geopolymére’99, geopolymer international conference, proceedings, 30 June–2 July, 1999, Saint-Quentin, France, p 9
3. Krivenko P (2005) In: Proceedings of the GGC 2005 (International workshop on geopolymers and geopolymer concrete), September 28–29, 2005, Perth, Australia. CD ROM, tGGC2005.pdf
4. Rowles M, O’Connor BH (2003) J Mater Chem 13:116110.1039/b212629j ↗
5. Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, van Deventer JSJ (2005) Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 269:4710.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.060 ↗
6. Duxson P, Mallicoat SW, Lukey GC, Kriven WM, van Deventer JSJ (2007) Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 292:810.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.05.044 ↗
7. Bell JL, Gordon M, Kriven WM (2005) In: Zhu D-M, Plucknett K, Kriven WM (eds) Ceramic engineering science proceeding, vol 26, issue 3, p 407
8. Latella BA, Perera DS, Escott TR, Cassidy DJ (2006) J Mater Sci 41:126110.1007/s10853-005-4234-3 ↗
9. Garon R, Balaguru P, Davidovits J (1999) In: Davidovits J, Davidovits R, James C (eds) Geopolymére’99, geopolymer international conference, proceedings. 30 June–2 July 1999, Saint-Quentin, France, p 171
10. Perera DS, Vance ER, Kiyama S, Aly Z, Yee P (2007) In: Dunn DS, Poinssot C, Begg BD (eds) Scientific basis for nuclear waste management XXX, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA, USA, p 361
11. Perera DS, Vance ER, Zhang Y, Davis J, Yee P (2005) In: Proceedings of the world congress on geopolymers, 29 June–1 July 2005, Saint-Quentin, France, p 57
12. Australian Standards 1774.3 (1992) Refractories and refractory materials—physical test methods. Method 3: determination of cold modulus of rupture. Standards Australia, Sydney, p 1
13. Srawley JE (1976) Int J Frac Mech 12:47510.1007/BF00032844 ↗
14. Swanson PL, Fairbanks CJ, Lawn BR, Mai Y-W, Hockey BJ (1987) J Am Ceram Soc 70:27910.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04982.x ↗
15. Duxon P (2006) PhD thesis, University of Melbourne
16. Perera DS, Cashion JD, Blackford MG, Zhang Z, Vance ER (2007) J Euro Ceram Soc 27:269710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.10.006 ↗