Optimizing nano-dynamic mechanical analysis for high-resolution, elastic modulus mapping in organic-rich shales
Source abstract
Abstract
An elastic modulus mapping technique based on spatially continuous dynamic nanoindentation is applied to map microscale variations in a fine-grained, kerogen-rich shale consisting of inorganic minerals with an interpenetrating network of microscale pores filled with organic matter. Advantages and limitations of the application of this technique to shales are explored through varying sample preparation and scanning procedures. Filtering techniques are developed to remove data that are negatively impacted by topography and other issues inherent to the mapping technique. As a result, spatial variations of elastic modulus in kerogen-rich regions are seen at substantially higher resolution than has previously been reported. Spatial resolution and continuous mapping across high stiffness-contrast material boundaries are further improved with stringent sample preparation and the use of a sharp tip. Typical modulus values measured by this technique include approximately 10 GPa for kerogen, 15–45 GPa for clay depending on the morphology and orientation, and 50–70 GPa for quartz.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Drilling and Well Engineering · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmadov R, Vanorio T, Mavko G (2009) Confocal laser scanning and atomic-force microscopy in estimation of elastic properties of the organic-rich Bazhenov Formation. Rock Phys 1:18–23. doi: 10.1190/1.3064141
2. Bobko C, Ulm F-J (2008) The nano-mechanical morphology of shale. Mech Mater 40:318–337. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.09.00610.1016/j.mechmat.2007.09.006 ↗
3. Zeszotarski JC, Chromik RR, Vinci RP, Messmer MC, Michels R, Larsen JW (2004) Imaging and mechanical property measurements of kerogen via nanoindentation. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:4113–4119. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2003.11.03110.1016/j.gca.2003.11.031 ↗
4. Vernik L, Nur A (1992) Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of hydrocarbon source rocks. Geophysics 57:727–73510.1190/1.1443286 ↗
5. Prasad M, Mba K, Sadler T, Batzle M (2011) Maturity and impedance analysis of organic-rich shales. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 14:533–543. doi: 10.2118/123531-PA10.2118/123531-PA ↗
6. Vega B, Dutta A, Kovscek AR (2014) CT imaging of low-permeability, dual-porosity systems using high x-ray contrast gas. Transport Porous Med 101:81–97. doi: 10.1007/s11242-013-0232-010.1007/s11242-013-0232-0 ↗
7. Kopycinska-Müller M, Prasad M, Rabe U, Arnold W (2007) Acoust ImagSpringer
8. Prasad M, Kopycinska M, Rabe U, Arnold W (2002) Measurement of Young’s modulus of clay minerals using atomic force acoustic microscopy. Geophys Res Lett 29:13-1–13-4. doi: 10.1029/2001GL01405410.1029/2001GL014054 ↗
9. Ulm F-J, Abousleiman Y (2006) The nanogranular nature of shale. Acta Geotech 1:77–88. doi: 10.1007/s11440-006-0009-510.1007/s11440-006-0009-5 ↗
10. Zargari S, Prasad M, Mba KC, Mattson ED (2013) Organic maturity, elastic properties, and textural characteristics of self resourcing reservoirs. Geophysics 78:D223–D235. doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0431.110.1190/geo2012-0431.1 ↗
11. Zhu W, Hughes JJ, Bicanic N, Pearce CJ (2007) Nanoindentation mapping of mechanical properties of cement paste and natural rocks. Mater Charact 58:1189–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2007.05.01810.1016/j.matchar.2007.05.018 ↗
12. Constantinides G, Ravi Chandran K, Ulm F-J, Van Vliet K (2006) Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: principles and validation. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 430:189–202. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.12510.1016/j.msea.2006.05.125 ↗
13. Balooch G, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Warren OL, Asif SA, Balooch M (2004) Evaluation of a new modulus mapping technique to investigate microstructural features of human teeth. J Biomech 37:1223–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.01210.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.012 ↗
14. Gaboriaud F, Dufrêne YF (2007) Atomic force microscopy of microbial cells: application to nanomechanical properties, surface forces and molecular recognition forces. Colloid Surface B 54:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.01410.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.014 ↗
15. Ryou H, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Arola D (2013) A characterization of the mechanical behavior of resin-infiltrated dentin using nanoscopic dynamic mechanical analysis. Dent Mater 29:719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.02210.1016/j.dental.2013.03.022 ↗
16. Sahin O, Erina N (2008) High-resolution and large dynamic range nanomechanical mapping in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 19:445717. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/44/44571710.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445717 ↗
17. Syed Asif SA, Wahl KJ, Colton RJ, Warren OL (2001) Quantitative imaging of nanoscale mechanical properties using hybrid nanoindentation and force modulation. J Appl Phys 90:1192. doi: 10.1063/1.138021810.1063/1.1380218 ↗
18. Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J (2009) The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis of porous media. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511626753 ↗
19. Hysitron (2012) TI 950 TriboIndenter User Manual
20. Fischer-Cripps AC (2007) Introduction to contact mechanics. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-68188-7 ↗