journal article·2006-08

A study on the rate of degradation of the bioabsorbable polymer polyglycolic acid (PGA)

Simon Shawe, Fraser Buchanan, Eileen Harkin-Jones, David Farrar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

As part of a study to characterise bioabsorbable scaffolds for tissue engineering an investigation has been conducted into the rate of degradation of polyglycolic acid (PGA). This is one of the most commonly used bioabsorbable materials and has been used in sutures since the 60s and more recently in cell scaffolds, drug delivery devices and bone fixation pins. This study looks at the influence that surface-to-volume ratio i.e. thickness of material, has on degradation. By degrading various thicknesses of PGA in a buffer saline solution over 24 days and testing their properties at regular intervals, a knowledge of how surface-to-volume ratio affects degradation was developed. Properties such as weight loss, crystallinity, molecular weight and structural integrity were measured. Results showed that rate of mass loss was dependent on sample thickness but crystallinity, melting point and molecular weight were independent of thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Agrawal CM, Ray BB (2000) J Biomed Mater Res 55:14110.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<141::AID-JBM1000>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
2. Li SM, Garreau H, Vert M (1990) J Mat Sci 1:121
3. Li SM, Garreau H, Vert M (1990) J Mat Sci 1:131
4. Li SM, Garreau H, Vert M (1990) J Mat Sci 1:198
5. Ashammakhi N, Makela EA, Vihtonen K, Rokkanen P, Kuisma H, Tormala P (1995) Biomaterials 16:13510.1016/0142-9612(95)98276-K ↗
6. Pillai O, Panchagnula R (2001) Chem Biol 5:447
7. Hurrell S, Cameron RE (2002) Biomaterials 23:240110.1016/S0142-9612(01)00376-3 ↗
8. Uhrich KE, Cannizzaro SM, Langer RS, Shakesheff KM (1999) Chem Rev 99:318110.1021/cr940351u ↗
9. Törmälä P, Pohjonen T, Rokkanen P (1998) Proc Inst Mech Eng 212 Pt H:10110.1243/0954411981533872 ↗
10. Middleton JC, Tipton AJ (2000) Biomaterials 21:233510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0 ↗
11. Bostman O, Pihlajamaki H (2000) Biomaterials 21:261510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00129-0 ↗
12. Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R (2003) Eur Cells Mater 5:110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
13. Hutmacher WD (2000) Biomaterials 21:252910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
14. Whang K, Thomas CH, Healy KE (1995) Polymer 36(4):83710.1016/0032-3861(95)93115-3 ↗
15. Hurrell S, Cameron RE (2001) J Mater Sci 12:811
16. Shum AWT, Mak AFT (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 81:14110.1016/S0141-3910(03)00083-1 ↗
17. King E, Cameron RE (1998) Macromol Symp 130:1910.1002/masy.19981300104 ↗
18. King E, Cameron RE (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 66:168110.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971128)66:9<1681::AID-APP6>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
19. Wu HC, Shen FU, Hong X, Chang WV, Hinet H (2003) Biomaterials 24:387110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00135-2 ↗
20. Hurrell S, Milroy GE, Cameron RE (2003) J Mat Sci 14:457
21. Barrows TH (1986) Clin Mater 1:23310.1016/S0267-6605(86)80015-4 ↗