Effect of processing parameters on the structure and multi-functional performance of epoxy/GNP-nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) are recently developed nanoparticles that are formed by stacks of short disk-like layers of graphite. They cost considerably less than their carbon nanotubes (CNTs) counterparts, and can be potentially used to generate multi-functional material systems. However, there are significant number of structural differences between GNPs and CNTs. It is therefore timely to review and optimize the current processing techniques used for generating GNP-nanocomposites. In this research, a scalable shear mixing approach (i.e., a three-roll mill) is utilized for achieving uniform dispersion of different fractions of GNPs in an epoxy resin. Then, the stiffness, electrical and thermal conductivity, and linear coefficient of thermal expansion of the resulting nanocomposites were evaluated. The as-processed nanocomposites exhibited significant improvement in their thermal properties, but a moderate increase in stiffness. The electrical percolation threshold of the nanocomposite occurred at higher concentration of GNP than that predicted by the available micromechanical models. This is attributed to the change in size of GNPs, which occurs as a result of manufacturing process, as observed by scanning electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Fim FdC, Guterres JM, Basso NRS, Galland GB (2010) Polyethylene/graphite nanocomposites obtained by in situ polymerization. J Polym Sci A 48(3):692–698. doi: 10.1002/pola.2382210.1002/pola.23822 ↗
2. Ruoff SR, Lorents DC (1995) Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 33(7):925–93010.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-5 ↗
3. Lanticse LJ, Tanabe Y, Matsui K, Kaburagi Y, Suda K, Hoteida M, Endo M, Yasuda E (2006) Shear-induced preferential alignment of carbon nanotubes resulted in anisotropic electrical conductivity of polymer composites. Carbon 44(14):3078–3086. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.00810.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.008 ↗
4. Yeh M-K, Tai N-H, Liu J-H (2006) Mechanical behavior of phenolic-based composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 44(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.00510.1016/j.carbon.2005.07.005 ↗
5. Scott CD, Arepalli S, Nikolaev P, Smalley RE (2001) Growth mechanisms for single-wall carbon nanotubes in a laser-ablation process. Appl Phys A 72(5):573–580. doi: 10.1007/s00339010076110.1007/s003390100761 ↗
6. See CH, Harris AT (2007) A review of carbon nanotube synthesis via fluidized-bed chemical vapor deposition. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(4):997–1012. doi: 10.1021/ie060955b10.1021/ie060955b ↗
7. Cho D, Lee S, Yang G, Fukushima H, Drzal LT (2005) Dynamic mechanical and thermal properties of phenylethynyl-terminated polyimide composites reinforced with expanded graphite nanoplatelets. Macromol Mater Eng 290(3):179–187. doi: 10.1002/mame.20040028110.1002/mame.200400281 ↗
8. Viculis LM, Mack JJ, Mayer OM, Hahn HT, Kaner RB (2005) Intercalation and exfoliation routes to graphite nanoplatelets. J Mater Chem 15(9):974–978. doi: 10.1039/B413029D10.1039/b413029d ↗
9. Chatterjee S, Nuesch FA, Chu BT (2011) Comparing carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets as reinforcements in polyamide 12 composites. Nanotechnology 22(27):275714. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/27571410.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275714 ↗
10. Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 74:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.11.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.11.015 ↗
11. Bortz DR, Heras EG, Martin-Gullon I (2012) Impressive fatigue life and fracture toughness improvements in graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Macromolecules 45(1):238–245. doi: 10.1021/ma201563k10.1021/ma201563k ↗
12. Chatterjee S, Nafezarefi F, Tai NH, Schlagenhauf L, Nüesch FA, Chu BTT (2012) Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 50(15):5380–5386. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02110.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.021 ↗
13. King JA, Klimek DR, Miskioglu I, Odegard GM (2013) Mechanical properties of graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci 128(6):4217–4223. doi: 10.1002/app.3864510.1002/app.38645 ↗
14. Ramakrishna S, Lim TC, Inai R, Fujihara K (2006) Modified Halpin–Tsai equation for clay-reinforced polymer nanofiber. Mech Adv Mater Struct 13(1):77–81. doi: 10.1080/1537649050034382410.1080/15376490500343824 ↗
15. Li J, Kim J-K (2007) Percolation threshold of conducting polymer composites containing 3D randomly distributed graphite nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 67(10):2114–2120. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.11.010 ↗
16. Chatterjee S, Wang JW, Kuo WS, Tai NH, Salzmann C, Li WL, Hollertz R, Nüesch FA, Chu BTT (2012) Mechanical reinforcement and thermal conductivity in expanded graphene nanoplatelets reinforced epoxy composites. Chem Phys Lett 531:6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.02.00610.1016/j.cplett.2012.02.006 ↗
17. Thostenson ET, Chou T-W (2006) Processing-structure-multi-functional property relationship in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Carbon 44(14):3022–3029. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.01410.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.014 ↗
18. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 64(15):2363–2371. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
19. ASTM D638 (2010) Standard test method for tensile properies of plastics. ASTM International, West conshohocken, PA
20. ASTM D257 (2007) Standard test method for DC resistance or conductance of insulating material. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
21. ASTM D4496 (2004) Standard test method for D–C resistance or condutance of moderately conductive materials. ASTM International, West Conshoohoken, PA
22. Bryan C, Whitman CA, Johnson MB, Niven JF, Murray P, Bourque A, Dąbkowska HA, Gaulin BD, White MA (2012) Thermal conductivity of (Er1−x Y x )2Ti2O7 pyrochlore oxide solid solutions. Phys Rev B 86(5):05430310.1103/PhysRevB.86.054303 ↗
23. ASTM D228 (2011) Standard test Method for linear thermal expansion of solid material with a push-rod dilatometer. ASTM international, West conshohocken PA
24. Wong M, Paramsothy M, Xu XJ, Ren Y, Li S, Liao K (2003) Physical interactions at carbon nanotube-polymer interface. Polymer 44(25):7757–7764. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.011 ↗
25. Celzard A, McRae E, Deleuze C, Dufort M, Furdin G, Marêché JF (1996) Critical concentration in percolating systems containing a high-aspect-ratio filler. Phys Rev B 53(10):6209–621410.1103/PhysRevB.53.6209 ↗
26. Lu C, Mai YW (2005) Influence of aspect ratio on barrier properties of polymer-clay nanocomposites. Phys Rev Lett 95(8):08830310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.088303 ↗
27. Ayatollahi MR, Shadlou S, Shokrieh MM, Chitsazzadeh M (2011) Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotube aspect ratio on mechanical and electrical properties of epoxy-based nanocomposites. Polym Test 30(5):548–556. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.04.008 ↗
28. Yang S-Y, Ma C-CM, Teng C–C, Huang Y-W, Liao S-H, Huang Y-L, Tien H-W, Lee T-M, Chiou K-C (2010) Effect of functionalized carbon nanotubes on the thermal conductivity of epoxy composites. Carbon 48(3):592–603. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.04710.1016/j.carbon.2009.08.047 ↗
29. Jiang H, Liu B, Huang Y, Hwang KC (2004) Thermal expansion of single wall carbon nanotubes. J Eng Mater Technol 126(3):265. doi: 10.1115/1.175292510.1115/1.1752925 ↗
30. Chow TS (1980) The effect of Particles shape on the mechanical properties of filled polymer. J Mater Sci 15:1873–1888. doi: 10.1007/BF0055061310.1007/BF00550613 ↗
31. Wang S, Tambraparni M, Qiu J, Tipton J, Dean D (2009) Thermal expansion of graphene composites. Macromolecules 42(14):5251–5255. doi: 10.1021/ma900631c10.1021/ma900631c ↗