Superamphiphobic aluminum alloy surfaces with micro and nanoscale hierarchical roughness produced by a simple and environmentally friendly technique
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, superamphiphobic (SAP) metallic aluminum (Al) alloy 2024 surfaces were produced with water and oil contact angles (CAs) of more than 150° and sliding angles of less than 10°. The two simple and environmentally friendly techniques of mechanical sanding and boiling water treatment were used to introduce micro and nanoscale roughnesses, respectively, which resulted in a hierarchical morphology. Surface energy of the rough surfaces was reduced by coating them with 1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane agent. SAP property was absent for samples with micro or nanoroughness only, and it emerged only after both kinds of roughnesses were introduced. The highest CAs approaching 158° for water, 156° for ethylene glycol, and 154° for peanut oil were obtained after forming hierarchical structures involving shapes of microgrooves obtained by one-directional sanding and nanograss by immersing in boiling water for 1 min. The effects of the two approaches of random and one-directional sanding using various sandpaper grit sizes, and different time periods of treatment with boiling water on the wettability of surfaces were also investigated. In addition, fundamental wetting models were used to explain the experimental results obtained. SAP Al surfaces could see a wide range of applications in fields such as self-cleaning, anti-icing, anticorrosion, oil transportation, energy harvesting, and microfluidics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Deng X, Mammen L, Butt H et al (2012) Candle soot as a template for a transparent robust superamphiphobic coating. Science 335:67–7010.1126/science.1207115 ↗
2. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M et al (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–162210.1126/science.1148326 ↗
3. Quéré D (2008) Wetting and roughness. Annu Rev Mater Res 38:71–9910.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434 ↗
4. Lafuma A, Quere D (2003) Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater 2:45710.1038/nmat924 ↗
5. Liu K, Jiang L (2012) Bio-inspired self-cleaning surfaces. Annu Rev Mater Res 42:231–26310.1146/annurev-matsci-070511-155046 ↗
6. Young T (1805) An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 95:65–8710.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
7. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem Res 28:988–99410.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
8. Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–55110.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
9. Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Wong CA et al (2006) Effects of micro- and nano-structures on the self-cleaning behavior of lotus leaves. Nanotechnology 17:135910.1088/0957-4484/17/5/032 ↗
10. Marmur A (2004) The lotus effect: superhydrophobicity and metastability. Langmuir 20:3517–351910.1021/la036369u ↗
11. Patankar NA (2003) On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19:124910.1021/la026612+ ↗
12. Cao L, Price TP, Weiss M et al (2008) Super water- and oil-repellent surfaces on intrinsically hydrophilic and oleophilic porous silicon films. Langmuir 24:1640–164310.1021/la703401f ↗
13. Tsujii K, Yamamoto T, Onda T et al (1997) Super oil-repellent surfaces. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 36:101110.1002/anie.199710111 ↗
14. Shibuichi S, Yamamoto T, Onda T et al (1998) Super water- and oil-repellent surfaces resulting from fractal structure. J Colloid Interface Sci 208:287–29410.1006/jcis.1998.5813 ↗
15. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–810.1007/s004250050096 ↗
16. Khedir KR, Kannarpady GK, Ishihara H et al (2011) Design and fabrication of teflon-coated tungsten nanorods for tunable hydrophobicity. Langmuir 27:466110.1021/la104891u ↗
17. Gao L, McCarthy TJ (2006) A perfectly hydrophobic surface (A/R = 180/180). J Am Chem Soc 128:905210.1021/ja062943n ↗
18. Kim H, Noh K, Choi C et al (2011) Extreme superomniphobicity of multiwalled 8 nm TiO2 nanotubes. Langmuir 27:10191–1019610.1021/la2014978 ↗
19. Kumar RTR, Mogensen KB, Boggild P (2010) Simple approach to superamphiphobic overhanging silicon nanostructures. J Phys Chem C 114:293610.1021/jp9066422 ↗
20. Meng H, Wang S, Xi J et al (2008) Facile means of preparing superamphiphobic surfaces on common engineering metals. J Phys Chem C 112:11454–1145810.1021/jp803027w ↗
21. Wu W, Wang X, Wang D et al (2009) Alumina nanowire forests via unconventional anodization and super-repellency plus low adhesion to diverse liquids. Chem Commun 9:1043–104510.1039/b818633b ↗
22. Yang J, Zhang Z, Men X et al (2010) A simple approach to fabricate superoleophobic coatings. New J Chem 35:576–58010.1039/C0NJ00826E ↗
23. Ji Seungmuk, Ramadhianti PA, Nguyen T et al (2013) Simple fabrication approach for superhydrophobic and superoleophobic Al surface. Microelectron Eng 111:404–40810.1016/j.mee.2013.04.010 ↗
24. Yang J, Zhang Z, Xu X et al (2011) Superoleophobic textured aluminum surfaces. New J Chem 35:2422–242610.1039/c1nj20401g ↗
25. Liu K, Jiang L (2011) Metallic surfaces with special wettability. Nanoscale 3:825–83810.1039/c0nr00642d ↗
26. Liu K, Tian Y, Jiang L (2013) Bio-inspired superoleophobic and smart materials: design, fabrication, and application. Prog Mater Sci 58:503–56410.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.11.001 ↗
27. Ohkubo Y, Tsuji I, Onishi S et al (2010) Preparation and characterization of super-hydrophobic and oleophobic surface. J Mater Sci 45:4963. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4362-210.1007/s10853-010-4362-2 ↗
28. Nilsson MA, Daniello RJ, Rothstein JP (2010) A novel and inexpensive technique for creating superhydrophobic surfaces using Teflon and sandpaper. J Phys D 43:04530110.1088/0022-3727/43/4/045301 ↗
29. Vedder W, Vermilyea DA (1969) Aluminum + water reaction. Trans Faraday Soc 65:561–58410.1039/tf9696500561 ↗
30. Alwitt RS (1971) Some physical and dielectric properties of hydrous alumina films. J Electrochem Soc 118:1730–173310.1149/1.2407826 ↗
31. Stralin A, Hjertberg T (1993) Improved adhesion strength between aluminum and ethylene copolymers by hydration of the aluminum surface. J Appl Polym Sci 49:511–52110.1002/app.1993.070490315 ↗
32. Rider AN, Arnott DR (2000) Boiling water and silane pre-treatment of aluminum alloys for durable adhesive bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes 20:209–22010.1016/S0143-7496(99)00046-9 ↗
33. Jafari R, Farzaneh M (2011) Fabrication of superhydrophobic nanostructured surface on aluminum alloy. Appl Phys A 102:195–19910.1007/s00339-010-6131-0 ↗
34. Yang Z, Wu Y-Z, Ye Y-F, Gong M-G, Xu X-L (2012) A simple way to fabricate an aluminum sheet with superhydrophobic and self-cleaning properties. Chinese Phys B 21:12680110.1088/1674-1056/21/12/126801 ↗
35. Hozumi A, Kim B, McCarthy TJ (2009) Hydrophobicity of perfluoroalkyl isocyanate monolayers on oxidized aluminum surfaces. Langmuir 25:6834–684010.1021/la804127z ↗
36. McCarvill WT, Bell JP (1974) Effect of time and type of water pretreatment on the bond strength of epoxy-aluminum joints. J Appl Polym Sci 18:335–34210.1002/app.1974.070180202 ↗
37. Zisman WA (1964) Relation of the equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. In: Anonymous contact angle, wettability, and adhesion, advances in chemistry, Washington, DC10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 ↗
38. Nishino T, Meguro M, Nakamae K et al (1999) Lowest surface free energy based on -CF3 alignment. Langmuir 15:4321–432310.1021/la981727s ↗
39. Hoque E, Derose JA, Kulik G et al (2006) Alkylphosphonate modified aluminum oxide surfaces. J Phys Chem B 110:1085510.1021/jp061327a ↗
40. Lakshmi RV, Bharathidasan T, Bera P et al (2012) Fabrication of superhydrophobic and oleophobic sol–gel nanocomposite coating. Surf Coat Technol 206:3888–389410.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.044 ↗
41. Tuteja A, Choi W, McKinley GH et al (2008) Design parameters for superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity. MRS Bull 33:752–75810.1557/mrs2008.161 ↗
42. Tuteja A, Choi W, Mabry JM et al (2008) Robust omniphobic surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1820010.1073/pnas.0804872105 ↗
43. Daniel I, Karl WK, Prantik M et al (2013) Superhydrophobic antireflection, and low haze glass surfaces using scalable dewetting nanostructuring. Nano Res 6:429–44010.1007/s12274-013-0320-z ↗
44. Chhatre SS, Choi W, Tuteja A et al (2010) Scale dependence of omniphobic mesh surfaces. Langmuir 26:4027–403510.1021/la903489r ↗
45. Ganesh VA, Dinachali SS, Nair AS et al (2013) Robust superamphiphobic film from electrospun TiO2 nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:1527–153210.1021/am302790d ↗
46. Zhao H, Park K, Law K (2012) Effect of surface texturing on superoleophobicity, contact angle hysteresis, and “robustness”. Langmuir 28:14925–1493410.1021/la302765t ↗
47. Mishchenko L, Hatton B, Bahadur V et al (2010) Design of ice-free nanostructured surfaces based on repulsion of impacting water droplets. ACS Nano 4:7699–770710.1021/nn102557p ↗
48. Bahadur V, Garimella SV (2009) Preventing the Cassie–Wenzel transition using surfaces with noneommunicating roughness elements. Langmuir 25:4815–482010.1021/la803691m ↗
49. Nosonovsky M, Bormashenko E (2009) In: Favret E, Fuentes N (eds) Functional properties of biological surfaces: characterization and technological applications. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, p 4310.1142/9789812837028_0003 ↗
50. Bhushan B, Jung YC, Koch K (2009) Nano and hierarchical structures for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning and low adhesion. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:1631–167210.1098/rsta.2009.0014 ↗
51. Feng L, Zhang Y, Xi J et al (2008) Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. Langmuir 24:4114–411910.1021/la703821h ↗
52. Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M (2010) The rose petal effect and the modes of superhydrophobicity. Philos Trans R Soc A 368:4713–472810.1098/rsta.2010.0203 ↗
53. Shuai Y, Yuchen Q, Yaxu H et al (2013) Peanut leaf inspired multifunctional surfaces. Small. doi: 10.1002/smll.20130102910.1002/smll.201301029 ↗