Thermal expansion behavior of hollow glass particle/vinyl ester composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Ceramic particle-reinforced composites have better dimensional stability than the matrix polymer at high temperatures. In hollow-particle filled composites (syntactic foams), the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) can be controlled by two parameters simultaneously: wall thickness and volume fraction of particles, which are explored in this study. The CTE was experimentally measured to be up to 60.4 % lower than the matrix material with the addition of glass microballoons for the twelve compositions of syntactic foams characterized using a thermomechanical analyzer. The CTE values have a stronger dependence on particle volume fraction than the wall thickness within the range of parameters explored. The experimental trends are analyzed by using Turner’s and Kerner’s models modified for syntactic foams. The results from the modified Turner’s model show close correlation with the experimental values with a maximum difference of ±15 %. Parametric studies show that syntactic foams of a wide range of densities can be tailored to obtain the same CTE value. The experimental and theoretical results are helpful in developing syntactic foams with desired properties for thermal applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E, Mensah P (2004) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 35:10310.1016/j.compositesa.2003.08.001 ↗
2. Gupta N, Woldesenbet E (2004) J Cell Plast 40:46110.1177/0021955X04048421 ↗
3. Devi KA, John B, Nair CPR, Ninan KN (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 105:371510.1002/app.26316 ↗
4. Wang W-T, Watkins L (2002) In: The 21st international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Oslo
5. Park S-J, Jin F-L, Lee C (2005) Mater Sci Eng, A 402:33510.1016/j.msea.2005.05.015 ↗
6. Lin TC, Gupta N, Talalayev A (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1520. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3074-310.1007/s10853-008-3074-3 ↗
7. Shabde V, Hoo K, Gladysz G (2006) J Mater Sci 41:4061. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.08.05010.1007/s10853-006-7637-x ↗
8. Porfiri M, Nguyen N, Gupta N (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1540. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3040-010.1007/s10853-008-3040-0 ↗
9. Zweben C (1998) JOM J Minerals Metals Mater Soc 50:4710.1007/s11837-998-0128-6 ↗
10. Lerch BA, Sullivan RM (2006) In: 43rd Annual technical meeting of the society of engineering science, August 13–16 2006, University Park
11. Deng DQ, Xu L (2003) Cryogenics 43:46510.1016/S0011-2275(03)00122-X ↗
12. Yang CG, Xu L, Chen N (2007) Energy Convers Manage 48:48110.1016/j.enconman.2006.06.016 ↗
13. Li G, Nettles D (2010) Polymer 51:75510.1016/j.polymer.2009.12.002 ↗
14. Wouterson EM, Boey FYC, Hu X, Wong S-C (2007) Polymer 48:318310.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.069 ↗
15. Rohatgi PK, Gupta N, Alaraj S (2006) J Compos Mater 40:116310.1177/0021998305057379 ↗
16. Zhang Q, Chen G, Wu G, Xiu Z, Luan B (2003) Mater Lett 57:145310.1016/S0167-577X(02)01006-6 ↗
17. Yusriah L, Mariatti M, Abu Bakar A (2010) J Reinf Plast Compos 29:306610.1177/0731684410364681 ↗
18. Wong CP, Bollampally RS (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 74:339610.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991227)74:14<3396::AID-APP13>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
19. McGrath LM, Parnas RS, King SH, Schroeder JL, Fischer DA, Lenhart JL (2008) Polymer 49:99910.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.014 ↗
20. Yung KC, Zhu BL, Yue TM, Xie CS (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69:26010.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.014 ↗
21. Budiansky B (1970) J Compos Mater 4:28610.1177/002199837000400301 ↗
22. Kerner EH (1956) Proc Phys Soc 69B:80810.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
23. Tummala RR, Friedberg AL (1970) J Appl Phys 41:510410.1063/1.1658618 ↗
24. Turner PS (1946) J Res Nat Bur Stand 37:23910.6028/jres.037.015 ↗
25. Vaidya RU, Chawla KK (1994) Compos Sci Technol 50:1310.1016/0266-3538(94)90122-8 ↗
26. Schapery RA (1968) J Compos Mater 2:38010.1177/002199836800200308 ↗
27. Lee KY, Kim KH, Jeoung SK, Ju SI, Shim JH, Kim NH, Lee SG, Lee SM, Lee JK, Paul DR (2007) Polymer 48:417410.1016/j.polymer.2007.05.036 ↗
28. Lee K-Y, Hong SR, Jeoung SK, Kim NH, Lee SG, Paul DR (2008) Polymer 49:214610.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.025 ↗
29. Gunes IS, Cao F, Jana SC (2008) J Polym Sci B 46:143710.1002/polb.21480 ↗
30. Nielsen LE (1967) J Compos Mater 1:10010.1177/002199836700100110 ↗
31. Balch DK, Fitzgerald TJ, Michaud V, Mortensen A, Shen Y, Suresh S (1996) Metall Mater Trans A 27A:370010.1007/BF02595462 ↗
32. Uju WA, Oguocha INA (2012) Mater Des 33:50310.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.056 ↗
33. Gupta N, Ye R, Porfiri M (2010) Compos B Eng 41:23610.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.004 ↗
34. Aureli M, Porfiri M, Gupta N (2010) Mech Mater 42:72610.1016/j.mechmat.2010.05.002 ↗
35. Shunmugasamy VC, Gupta N, Nguyen NQ, Coelho PG (2010) Mater Sci Eng, A 527:616610.1016/j.msea.2010.06.021 ↗
36. Sideridis E, Kytopoulos VN, Kyriazi E, Bourkas G (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:90910.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.019 ↗
37. Kerner EH (1956) Proc Phys Soc B 69(8): 80810.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
38. Nji J, Li G (2008) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:140410.1016/j.compositesa.2008.05.001 ↗
39. Li G, Zhao Y, Pang S–S (1999) Mater Sci Eng, A 271:4310.1016/S0921-5093(99)00227-0 ↗
40. Li G, Zhao Y, Pang SS (1998) Cem Concr Res 28:105710.1016/S0008-8846(98)00062-3 ↗
41. Tagliavia G, Porfiri M, Gupta N (2010) Int J Solids Struct 47:216410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.04.025 ↗
42. Poveda R, Gupta N, Porfiri M (2010) Mater Lett 64:236010.1016/j.matlet.2010.07.063 ↗
43. Saha MC, Nilufar S, Major M, Jeelani S (2008) Polym Compos 29:29310.1002/pc.20374 ↗
44. Porfiri M, Gupta N (2009) Compos B Eng 40:16610.1016/j.compositesb.2008.09.002 ↗