journal article·2010-10

Kinetics of isothermal reactive diffusion between solid Fe and liquid Al

Y. Tanaka, M. Kajihara

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

The kinetics of the reactive diffusion between solid Fe and liquid Al was experimentally observed using Fe/Al diffusion couples. The diffusion couples were prepared by an isothermal bonding technique and then immediately annealed in the temperature range of T = 1053–1093 K for various times up to t = 600 s. Owing to annealing, an intermetallic layer with a rather uniform thickness is produced at the Fe/Al interface in the diffusion couple and grows into the solid Fe specimen. The intermetallic layer consists of Fe2Al5 and FeAl3, and the thickness is much smaller for FeAl3 than for Fe2Al5. Hence, the growth of the intermetallic layer is predominantly governed by Fe2Al5. The total thickness, l, of the intermetallic layer increases with increasing annealing time, t, according to the parabolic relationship l 2 = Kt. This may mean that the growth of the intermetallic layer is controlled by volume diffusion. If the temperature dependence of the parabolic coefficient K is expressed by the equation K = K 0exp(−Q K /RT), K 0 = 126 m2/s and Q K = 248 kJ/mol are obtained from the experimental values of K at T = 1053–1093 K by the least-squares method. A mathematical model was used to evaluate the interdiffusion coefficient, D, of Fe2Al5 from K. The evaluation provides D 0 = 2.55 × 103 m2/s and Q = 259 kJ/mol for the dependence of D on T described as D = D 0exp(−Q/RT). Thus, K is one fifth of D at T = 1053–1093 K, and Q K does not necessarily coincide with Q. D is about two orders of magnitude greater for the values evaluated in the present study than for those extrapolated from the previously reported result at T = 823–913 K. The microstructure observation in a previous study suggests that such large values of D are attributed to the boundary diffusion in the intermetallic layer as well as the crystallographic anisotropy of Fe2Al5.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Gebhardt E, Obrowski W (1953) Z Metallkde 44:154
2. Gürtler G, Sagel K (1955) Z Metallkde 46:738
3. Heumann T, Dittrich S (1959) Z Metallkde 50:617
4. Denner SG, Jones RD (1977) Met Technol 4:16710.1179/030716977803292574 ↗
5. Yeremenko VN, Natanzon YV, Dybkov VI (1981) J Mater Sci 16:1748. doi: 10.1007/BF0054062010.1007/BF00540620 ↗
6. Eggeler G, Auer W, Kaesche H (1986) Z Metallkde 77:239
7. Dybkov VI (1990) J Mater Sci 25:3615. doi: 10.1007/BF0057539710.1007/BF00575397 ↗
8. Bouché K, Barbier F, Coulet A (1998) Mater Sci Eng A 249:16710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00573-5 ↗
9. Kobayashi S, Yakou T (2002) Mater Sci Eng A 338:4410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00053-9 ↗
10. Bouayad A, Gerometta Ch, Belkebir A, Ambari A (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 363:5310.1016/S0921-5093(03)00469-6 ↗
11. Nishimoto S, Kobayashi S, Takada N, Matsuo T, Takeyama M (2008) Abst Annual Meeting JIM, Kumamoto, Japan, Sep. 23–25, p 82
12. Massalski TB, Okamoto H, Subramanian PR, Kacprzak L (1990) Binary alloy phase diagrams, vol 1. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, p 148
13. Tanaka Y, Kajihara M (2009) Mater Trans 50:221210.2320/matertrans.M2009128 ↗
14. Tanaka Y, Kajihara M, Watanabe Y (2006) Mater Sci Eng A 445–446:355
15. Kajihara M (2004) Acta Mater 52:119310.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.047 ↗
16. Kajihara M (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 403:23410.1016/j.msea.2005.05.013 ↗
17. Kajihara M (2005) Mater Trans 46:214210.2320/matertrans.46.2142 ↗
18. Kajihara M (2006) Defect Diffus Forum 249:9110.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.249.91 ↗
19. Kajihara M (2006) Mater Trans 47:148010.2320/matertrans.47.1480 ↗
20. Tanaka Y, Kajihara M (2006) Mater Trans 47:248010.2320/matertrans.47.2480 ↗
21. Kajihara M, Yamashina T (2007) J Mater Sci 42:2432. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-1212-310.1007/s10853-006-1212-3 ↗
22. Kajihara M (2008) Mater Trans 49:71510.2320/matertrans.MRA2007316 ↗
23. Jost W (1960) Diffusion of solids, liquids, gases. Academic Press, New York, p 68
24. van Loo FJJ (1990) Prog Solid State Chem 20:4710.1016/0079-6786(90)90007-3 ↗
25. Furuto A, Kajihara M (2008) Mater Trans 49:29410.2320/matertrans.MRA2007192 ↗
26. Kato M, Kosaka M, Yamada M, Takayanagi T, Minowa S (1966) Report of Nagoya Municipal Industrial Research Institute 15:301
27. Eremenko VN, Natanzon YV, Tivov VP (1977) Russ Metall 2:77
28. Ejima T, Yamamura T, Uchida N, Matsuzaki Y, Nikaido M (1980) J Jpn Inst Met 44:31610.2320/jinstmet1952.44.3_316 ↗
29. Kikuchi T, Tani K (1994) Trans Niihama Coll Technol 30:65
30. Du Y, Chang YA, Huang B, Gong W, Jin Z, Xu H, Yuan Z, Liu Y, He Y, Xie FY (2003) Mater Sci Eng A 363:14010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00624-5 ↗
31. Japan Institute of Metals (1993) (ed) Metals data book. Maruzen, Tokyo, p 21
32. Naoi D, Kajihara M (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 459:37510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.099 ↗
33. Tanaka Y, Kajihara M (2007) Mater Sci Eng A 459:10110.1016/j.msea.2006.12.092 ↗
34. Griger A, Stefániay V, Turmezey T (1986) Z Metallkde 77:30