The mechanical response of Rohacell foams at different length scales
Source abstract
Abstract
The quasi-static mechanical response of polymethacrylimide (PMI) foams of density ranging from 50 to 200 kg m−3 is investigated in order to provide experimental data to inspire and validate numerical constitutive models for the response of polymer foams. The macroscopic mechanical response is characterised by conducting quasi-static compression, tension, shear and indentation experiments, whereas microscopic deformation mechanisms are identified by conducting in situ SEM observations during static compression and tension tests; it is shown that foams of low density collapse by cell wall buckling while foams of high density undergo plastic cell-wall bending. As a result, both the elastic and plastic macroscopic response of the foam display a tension/compression asymmetry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Subhash G, Liu Q, Gao X (2005) Int J Impact Eng 329:1113
2. Eaves D (2004) Handbook of polymer foams, vol 1. Rapra Technology Limited, Shropshire, p 290
3. Song B, Chen W, Lu W-Y (2007) J Mater Sci 42(17):7502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1612-z10.1007/s10853-007-1612-z ↗
4. Mills N (2007) Polymer foams handbook: engineering and biomechanics applications and design guide. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, p 535
5. Mines RAW (2008) Strain 44:7110.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00399.x ↗
6. Reid SR, Peng C (1997) Int J Impact Eng 19:53110.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
7. Tagarielli VL, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2007) Compos B 39:8310.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.005 ↗
8. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Int J Impact Eng 24(3):27710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
9. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 532
10. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1995) Cell Polym 14:18610.1177/0262489319951403002 ↗
11. Li QM, Mines RAW, Birch RS (1999) Int J Solids Struct 37(2000):19
12. Benderly D, Putter S (2004) J Polym Test 23:5110.1016/S0142-9418(03)00061-8 ↗
13. Zenkert D, Burman M (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69:78510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.017 ↗
14. Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM, Mines RAW (2008) J Cell Plast 44(5):41510.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
15. Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Persson K (2004) J Compos B 35(6–8):51110.1016/j.compositesb.2003.09.006 ↗
16. Steeves CA, Fleck NA (2004) Int J Mech Sci 46:58510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.004 ↗
17. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) J Compos Struct 69(1):9510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.013 ↗
18. Roehm (1998) Rohacell WF PMI Foam. Roehm Ltd., Milton Keynes
19. Fleck NA, Otoyo H, Needleman A (1992) Int J Solids Struct 29:161310.1016/0020-7683(92)90012-I ↗
20. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Acta Mater 49(10):185910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗