journal article·2011-11

The mechanical response of Rohacell foams at different length scales

S. Arezoo, V. L. Tagarielli, N. Petrinic, J. M. Reed

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 21
Publisher page

Abstract

The quasi-static mechanical response of polymethacrylimide (PMI) foams of density ranging from 50 to 200 kg m−3 is investigated in order to provide experimental data to inspire and validate numerical constitutive models for the response of polymer foams. The macroscopic mechanical response is characterised by conducting quasi-static compression, tension, shear and indentation experiments, whereas microscopic deformation mechanisms are identified by conducting in situ SEM observations during static compression and tension tests; it is shown that foams of low density collapse by cell wall buckling while foams of high density undergo plastic cell-wall bending. As a result, both the elastic and plastic macroscopic response of the foam display a tension/compression asymmetry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Subhash G, Liu Q, Gao X (2005) Int J Impact Eng 329:1113
2. Eaves D (2004) Handbook of polymer foams, vol 1. Rapra Technology Limited, Shropshire, p 290
3. Song B, Chen W, Lu W-Y (2007) J Mater Sci 42(17):7502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1612-z10.1007/s10853-007-1612-z ↗
4. Mills N (2007) Polymer foams handbook: engineering and biomechanics applications and design guide. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, p 535
5. Mines RAW (2008) Strain 44:7110.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00399.x ↗
6. Reid SR, Peng C (1997) Int J Impact Eng 19:53110.1016/S0734-743X(97)00016-X ↗
7. Tagarielli VL, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2007) Compos B 39:8310.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.005 ↗
8. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2000) Int J Impact Eng 24(3):27710.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
9. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 532
10. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1995) Cell Polym 14:18610.1177/0262489319951403002 ↗
11. Li QM, Mines RAW, Birch RS (1999) Int J Solids Struct 37(2000):19
12. Benderly D, Putter S (2004) J Polym Test 23:5110.1016/S0142-9418(03)00061-8 ↗
13. Zenkert D, Burman M (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69:78510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.017 ↗
14. Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM, Mines RAW (2008) J Cell Plast 44(5):41510.1177/0021955X08095113 ↗
15. Zenkert D, Shipsha A, Persson K (2004) J Compos B 35(6–8):51110.1016/j.compositesb.2003.09.006 ↗
16. Steeves CA, Fleck NA (2004) Int J Mech Sci 46:58510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.04.004 ↗
17. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D (2005) J Compos Struct 69(1):9510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.013 ↗
18. Roehm (1998) Rohacell WF PMI Foam. Roehm Ltd., Milton Keynes
19. Fleck NA, Otoyo H, Needleman A (1992) Int J Solids Struct 29:161310.1016/0020-7683(92)90012-I ↗
20. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2001) Acta Mater 49(10):185910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00058-1 ↗