journal article·2013-07

Comparison of chemical vapor deposition and chemical grafting for improving the mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites with multi-wall carbon nanotubes

Huaiping Rong, Klaus-Hermann Dahmen, Hamid Garmestani, Muhuo Yu, Karl I. Jacob

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

By engineering the fiber/matrix interface, the properties of the composite can be changed significantly. In this work, we increased the effective surface area of the fiber/matrix interface, to facilitate additional stress transfer between fibers and matrix, by grafting carbon nanotubes on to carbon fibers (in the form of carbon fabric) by two different methods: (1) chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method and (2) a purely chemical method. With the CVD process, carbon nanotubes (CNT) were directly grown on carbon fiber substrate using chemical vapors. For the chemical method, CNT with carboxyl groups were grafted on functionalized carbon fiber via a chemical reaction. The morphology of CNT/carbon fibers was examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) which revealed uniform coverage of carbon fibers with CNT in both of CVD method and chemical grafting method. CNT-grafted woven carbon fibers were used to make carbon/epoxy composites, and their mechanical properties were measured using three-point bending and tension tests which showed that those with CNT-grafted carbon fiber reinforcements using the CVD process has 11 % higher tensile strength compared to those containing carbon fibers modified with the chemical method. Also, composites with CNT-grafted carbon fibers with chemical method showed 20 % higher tensile strength compared to composites with unmodified carbon fibers. The results of tensile test revealed that both CVD and chemical grafting could significantly improve the mechanical properties of the carbon fiber composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Mangalgiri P (1999) Bull Mater Sci 22:65710.1007/BF02749982 ↗
2. Dai ZS, Zhang BY, Shi FH, Li M, Zhang ZG, Gu YZ (2011) Appl Surf Sci 257:845710.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.129 ↗
3. Rezaei F, Yunus R, Ibrahim NA (2009) Mater Des 30:26010.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.005 ↗
4. Ye YP, Chen HB, Wu JS, Chan CM (2011) Compos B Eng 42:214510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.010 ↗
5. Fan Z, Wu C, Chen J (2008) Carbon 46:36510.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.011 ↗
6. Xie X-L, Mai Y-W, Zhou X-P (2005) Mater Sci Eng R: Rep 49:8910.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
7. Siddiqui NA, Khan SU, Ma PC, Li CY, Kim JK (2011) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42:141210.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.005 ↗
8. Cho J, Daniel I (2008) Scripta Mater 58:53310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.011 ↗
9. Zhu J, Kim J, Peng H, Margrave JL, Khabashesku VN, Barrera EV (2003) Nano Lett 3:110710.1021/nl0342489 ↗
10. Aldajah S, Haik Y (2012) Mater Des 34:37910.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.013 ↗
11. Gonçalez V, Barcia FL, Soares BG (2006) J Braz Chem Soc 17:111710.1590/S0103-50532006000600008 ↗
12. Kaynak C, Orgun O, Tincer T (2005) Polym Test 24:45510.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.01.004 ↗
13. Feraboli P, Masini A (2004) Compos B Eng 35:32310.1016/j.compositesb.2003.11.010 ↗
14. Zhang F-H, Wang R-G, He X-D, Wang C, Ren L-N (2009) J Mater Sci 44:3574. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x10.1007/s10853-009-3484-x ↗
15. Lee JS, Kang TJ (1997) Carbon 35:20910.1016/S0008-6223(96)00138-8 ↗
16. Zhou Y, Pervin F, Lewis L, Jeelani S (2008) Mater Sci Eng A 475:15710.1016/j.msea.2007.04.043 ↗
17. de Resende VG, Antunes EF, de Oliveira Lobo A, Oliveira DAL, Trava-Airoldi VJ, Corat EJ (2010) Carbon 48:363510.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.006 ↗
18. Zhao F, Huang YD (2011) J Mater Chem 21:369510.1039/c0jm03128c ↗
19. Thostenson ET, Li WZ, Wang DZ, Ren ZF, Chou TW (2002) J Appl Phys 91:603410.1063/1.1466880 ↗
20. Mathur RB, Chatterjee S, Singh BP (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:160810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.020 ↗
21. Zhang Q, Liu J, Sager R, Dai L, Baur J (2009) Compos Sci Technol 69:59410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.12.002 ↗
22. An F, Lu CX, Li YH, Guo JH, Lu XX, Lu HB, He SQ, Yang Y (2012) Mater Des 33:19710.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.027 ↗
23. Kim IT, Nunnery GA, Jacob K, Schwartz J, Liu XT, Tannenbaum R (2010) J Phys Chem C 114:694410.1021/jp9118925 ↗
24. Rong HP, Han KQ, Li S, Tian YC, Yu MH (2012) J Appl Polym Sci 127:203310.1002/app.37699 ↗
25. Laachachi A, Vivet A, Nouet G, Ben Doudou B, Poilane C, Chen J, Bai JB, Ayachi M (2008) Mater Lett 62:39410.1016/j.matlet.2007.05.044 ↗
26. Sharma SP, Lakkad SC (2011) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 42:810.1016/j.compositesa.2010.09.008 ↗
27. Lv P, Feng YY, Zhang P, Chen HM, Zhao NQ, Feng W (2011) Carbon 49:466510.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.064 ↗
28. Agnihotri P, Basu S, Kar KK (2011) Carbon 49:309810.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.032 ↗
29. Bekyarova E, Thostenson ET, Yu A, Kim H, Gao J, Tang J, Hahn HT, Chou T-W, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2007) Langmuir 23:397010.1021/la062743p ↗
30. Kim MT, Rhee KY, Lee JH, Hui D, Lau AKT (2011) Compos B Eng 42:125710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.005 ↗
31. He XD, Zhang FH, Wang RG, Liu WB (2007) Carbon 45:255910.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.018 ↗
32. Ashrafi B, Guan JW, Mirjalili V, Zhang YF, Chun L, Hubert P, Simard B, Kingston CT, Bourne O, Johnston A (2011) Compos Sci Technol 71:156910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.015 ↗
33. Davis DC, Wilkerson JW, Zhu J, Hadjiev VG (2011) Compos Sci Technol 71:108910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.014 ↗
34. Xie J, Xin D, Cao H, Wang C, Zhao Y, Yao L, Ji F, Qiu Y (2011) Surf Coat Technol 206:19110.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.04.016 ↗
35. Zhao JG, Liu L, Guo QG, Shi JL, Zhai GT, Song JR (2008) New Carbon Mater 23:12