journal article·2011-06

Impact of the electrodeposition chemistry used for TSV filling on the microstructural and thermo-mechanical response of Cu

Chukwudi Okoro, Riet Labie, Kris Vanstreels, Alexis Franquet, Mario Gonzalez, Bart Vandevelde, Eric Beyne, Dirk Vandepitte, Bert Verlinden

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the role of electrodeposition chemistry on thermo-mechanical behavior of different Cu-films is examined. For this study, three different Cu electrodeposition chemistries were analyzed using Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (TOF-SIMS), Focused Ion Beam (FIB), Laser Scanning method, Electron Backscattered Diffraction, and the Nano-indentation techniques. It is found that the level of impurity in Cu-films, resulting from the used electrodeposition additives, has a significant impact on their microstructural and thermo-mechanical behavior. Cu-films having high impurity content showed residual stress levels that are three times higher than the less impure Cu-films. This implies that the use of such impure electrodeposition chemistry for the filling of TSVs will result in high residual stresses in the Cu–TSV, thus inducing higher stresses in Si, which could be a reliability concern. Therefore, the choice of the used electrodeposition chemistry for the filling of TSVs should not be limited only to the achievement of a void free Cu–TSV, as consideration ought to be given to their thermo-mechanical response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D IC and TSV technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Lühn O et al (2009) Electrochim Acta 54:250410.1016/j.electacta.2008.04.002 ↗
2. Lühn O et al (2009) Electrochem Solid-State Lett 12(5):D3910.1149/1.3087790 ↗
3. Lühn O et al (2008) In: Proceedings of the 58th electronics components and technology conference (ECTC), Orlando, pp 866–87010.1109/ECTC.2008.4550078 ↗
4. Lühn O et al (2009) PhD Thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, pp 143–151
5. Van Bavel M et al (2008) Future FAB Int 27(7):112
6. Dixit P et al (2006) J Electrochem Soc 153(6):G55210.1149/1.2189238 ↗
7. Okoro C et al (2010) J Micromech Microeng 20:04503210.1088/0960-1317/20/4/045032 ↗
8. Changdong G et al (2009) J Micromech Microeng 19:06501110.1088/0960-1317/19/6/065011 ↗
9. Luhua X et al (2007) Appl Phys Lett 90:033111 3 pp10.1063/1.2432284 ↗
10. Zhang W et al (2005) In: MRS conference proceedings, p 347
11. Okoro C et al (2007) In: Proceedings of the electronics components and technology conference (ECTC), Reno, p 249
12. Okoro C et al (2008) In: Proceedings of the 11th international interconnect technology conference, San Francisco, p 1610.1109/IITC.2008.4546912 ↗
13. Van De Plas G et al (2010) Design Issues and Considerations for Low-Cost 3D TSV IC Technology ISSCC 2010, p 14810.1109/ISSCC.2010.5434016 ↗
14. Okoro C et al (2010) In: Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference, vol 1300, Stress-Induced Phenomena in Metallization: 11th International Workshop, p 214
15. Van Olmen J et al (2008) 3D stacked IC demonstrator using hybrid collective die-to-wafer bonding with copper through silicon vias (TSV). IEEE IEDM, San Francisco, p 603
16. Huyghebaert C et al (2010) In: Proceedings of the 60th electronics components and technology conference, Las Vegas, p 108310.1109/ECTC.2010.5490836 ↗
17. Janssen GCAM et al (2009) Thin Solid Films 517(6):185810.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.014 ↗
18. Wyko Surface Profilers Technical Reference Manual, p 1-1-14
19. Thouless MD (1995) Annu Rev Mater Sci 25:6910.1146/annurev.ms.25.080195.000441 ↗
20. Shen YL et al (2003) J Vac Sci Technol B 21(4):125810.1116/1.1574051 ↗
21. Gardner DS et al (2008) IEEE Trans Electron Devices 35(12):216010.1109/16.8790 ↗
22. Yin L et al (2009) In: Proceedings of the 59th electronic components and technology conference, San Diego, p 406
23. Vanstreels K (2007) PhD Thesis, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
24. Kobrinsky MJ et al (2001) J Appl Phys 89(1):9110.1063/1.1326856 ↗
25. Korhonen MA et al (1991) J Appl Phys 70:677410.1063/1.349852 ↗
26. Chidiambarrao D et al (1997) Metall Mater Trans A 28(12):251510.1007/s11661-997-0009-6 ↗
27. Su P et al (1999) In: Kraft O, Arzt E, Volkert CA, Ho PS, Okabayashi H (eds) In: Proceedings of the American institute of physics, 5th worshop on stress-induced phenomena in metallization, New York, p 298
28. Shaw TM et al (2002) In: Baker SP et al (eds) In: Proceedings of the American institute conference, vol 612, 6th workshop on stress-induced phenomena in metallization, p 177
29. Atkinson HV (1988) Acta Metall 36(3):46910.1016/0001-6160(88)90079-X ↗
30. Pharr GM et al (2010) Annu Rev Mater Sci 40:27110.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
31. Volinsky AA et al (2001) Mater Res Symp 649:Q5.3.1
32. Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Claredon Press, United Kingdom, p 174
33. Harper JME et al (1999) J Appl Phys 84(5):251610.1063/1.371086 ↗
34. El-Khozondar R et al (2006) Egypt J Solids 29(1):347
35. Mercha A et al (2010) Comprehensive Analysis of the Impact of Single and Arrays of Through Silicon Vias Induced Stress on High-k/Metal Gate CMOS Performance. International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM, San Francisco, p 2.2.1
36. Mercha et al (2010) Impact of thinning and through silicon via proximity on high-k/metal gate first CMOS performance. VLSI Technology, Honolulu, p 109
37. Yang Y et al (2010) International Interconnect Technology Conference (IITC), Burlingame, p 1