Effect of single-step strain and annealing on grain boundary character distribution and intergranular corrosion in Alloy 690
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of single-step thermomechanical treatments on the grain boundary character distribution (GBCD) and intergranular corrosion of Alloy 690 (Ni–30Cr–10Fe, wt.%) are investigated. High proportion of low ΣCSL grain boundaries (more than 70% according to Palumbo–Aust criterion) associating with large size grains-cluster microstructure is obtained through one-step thermomechanical treatment of 5% cold rolling followed by annealing at 1,100 °C for 5 min. Nucleation density of recrystallization and multiple twinning are the key factors affecting the GBCD. The grains-cluster is produced by multiple twinning starting from a single recrystallization nucleus. That the mean size of the grains-clusters and proportion of low ΣCSL boundaries decrease with the increasing strain, is caused by the increasing nucleation density of recrystallization with the increase of strain. The specimen with large size grains-cluster microstructure and high proportion of low ΣCSL boundaries exhibits much better resistance to mass loss during intergranular corrosion testing than that with small size grains-cluster microstructure and relatively low proportion of low ΣCSL boundaries.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Thuvander M, Stiller K (2000) Mat Sci Eng A 281:96–10310.1016/S0921-5093(99)00741-8 ↗
2. Qiu S, Su X, Wen Y (1995) Nuclear Power Engineering 16:336–340
3. Kurban M, Erb U, Aust KT (2006) Scripta Mater 54:1053–105810.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.055 ↗
4. Bi HY, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ (2003) Scripta Mater 49:219–22310.1016/S1359-6462(03)00261-6 ↗
5. Bennett BW, Pickering HW (1987) Metall Trans A 18A:1117–112410.1007/BF02668561 ↗
6. Palumbo G, Erb U (1999) MRS Bull 24:27–3210.1557/S0883769400053422 ↗
7. Crawford DC, Was GS (1992) Metall Trans A 23A:1195–120610.1007/BF02665051 ↗
8. Watanabe T (1984) Res Mech 11:47–82
9. Kronberg ML, Wilson FH (1949) Trans Am Inst Min Engrs 185:501
10. Lehockey EM, Limoges D, Palumbo G, Sklarchuk J, Tomantschger K, Vincze A (1999) J Power Sources 78:79–8310.1016/S0378-7753(99)00015-4 ↗
11. Lin P, Palumbo G, Erb U (1995) Scripta Metall Mater 33:1387–139210.1016/0956-716X(95)00420-Z ↗
12. King WE, Schwartz AJ (1998) Scripta Mater 38:449–45510.1016/S1359-6462(97)00486-7 ↗
13. Shimada M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ (2002) Acta Mater 50:2331–234110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
14. Michiuchi M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ, Sato YS, Sakai K (2006) Acta Mater 554:5179–518410.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.030 ↗
15. Randle V (2004) Acta Mater 52:4067–408110.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
16. Randle V (1999) Acta Mater 47:4187–419610.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
17. Kumar M, Schwartz AJ, King WE (2002) Acta Mater 50:2599–261210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3 ↗
18. Alexandreanu B, Capell B, Was G (2001) Mat Sci Eng A 300:94–10410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01705-6 ↗
19. Lee S-L, Richards NL (2005) Mat Sci Eng A 390:81–8710.1016/j.msea.2004.08.044 ↗
20. Guyot BM, Richards NL (2005) Mat Sci Eng A 395:87–9710.1016/j.msea.2004.12.021 ↗
21. Tan L, Sridharan K, Allen TR (2006) J Nucl Mater 348:263–27110.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.09.023 ↗
22. Palumbo G, Aust KT (1990) Acta Metall Mater 38:2343–235210.1016/0956-7151(90)90101-L ↗
23. Gertsman VY, Henager CH (2003) Interface Sci 11:403–41510.1023/A:1026191810431 ↗
24. Gottstein G (1984) Acta Metall 32:1117–113810.1016/0001-6160(84)90015-4 ↗
25. Fullman RL, Fisher JC (1951) J Appl Phys 22:1350–135510.1063/1.1699865 ↗
26. Gleiter H (1969) Acta Metall 17:1421–142810.1016/0001-6160(69)90004-2 ↗
27. Meyers MA, Murr LE (1978) Acta Metall 26:951–96210.1016/0001-6160(78)90046-9 ↗
28. Mahajan S, Pande CS, Imam MA, Rath BB (1997) Acta Mater 45:2633–263810.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9 ↗
29. Berger A, Wilbrandt P-J, Ernst F (1988) Prog Mater Sci 32:1–9510.1016/0079-6425(88)90009-6 ↗
30. Humphreys FJ, Hatherly M (2004) Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Oxford
31. Kumar M, King WE, Schwartz AJ (2000) Acta Mater 48:2081–209110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00045-8 ↗
32. Schuh CA, Kumar M, King WE (2003) Acta Mater 51:678–700
33. Schuh CA, Kumar M, King WE (2003) Z Metallkd 94:323–32810.3139/146.030323 ↗
34. Brandon DG (1966) Acta Metall 14:1479–148410.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
35. Randle V (1996) The role of the coincidence site lattice in grain boundary engineering. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
36. Palumbo G, Aust KT, Lehockey EM (1998) Script Mater 38:1685–169010.1016/S1359-6462(98)00077-3 ↗
37. Kim SH, Erb U, Aust KT, Palumbo G (2001) Script Mater 44:835–83910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00682-5 ↗
38. Zhou Y, Aust KT, Erb U, Palumbo G (2001) Script Mater 45:49–5410.1016/S1359-6462(01)00990-3 ↗
39. Randle V, Davies H (2002) Ultramicroscopy 90:153–16210.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1 ↗
40. Randle V, Davies P (1999) Interface Sci 7:5–1310.1023/A:1008734331685 ↗
41. Gertsman VY, Bruemmer SM (2001) Acta Mater 49:1589–159810.1016/S1359-6454(01)00064-7 ↗
42. Lin H, Pope DP (1993) Acta Metall Mater 41:553–56210.1016/0956-7151(93)90085-7 ↗