Dislocations in single hemp fibres—investigations into the relationship of structural distortions and tensile properties at the cell wall level
Source abstract
Abstract
The relationship between dislocations and mechanical properties of single hemp fibres (Cannabis sativa L. var. Felina) was studied using a microtensile testing setup in a 2-fold approach. In a first investigation the percentage of dislocations was quantified using polarized light microscopy (PLM) prior to microtensile testing of the fibres. In a second approach PLM was used to monitor the dislocations while straining single fibres. The first part of the study comprised 53 hemp fibres with up to 20% of their cell wall consisting of dislocations. For this data set the percentage of dislocations did not affect the mechanical properties. In the second part of the study it was found that dislocations disappeared during tensile testing, and that they did not reappear until several weeks after failure. A strain stiffening effect due to the straightening of the dislocations was not observed. It is possible that the former positions of the dislocations functioned as locations for crack initiation. However, the crack does not propagate transversely all the way trough the dislocation but results in a shear failure between the microfibrils. In rheological studies fibres were strained at constant stress levels, and dislocations that had disappeared did not reappear during that period.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Nyholm K, Ander P, Bardage S, Daniel G (2001) Nordic Pulp Paper Res J 4:37610.3183/NPPRJ-2001-16-04-p376-384 ↗
2. Hughes M, Sèbe G, Hague J, Hill C, Spear M, Mott L (2000) Composite Interfaces 7:1310.1163/156855400300183551 ↗
3. Bos HL, Van Den Oever MJA, Peters OCJJ (2002) J Mater Sci 37:168310.1023/A:1014925621252 ↗
4. Bos HL, Donald AM (1999) J Mater Sci 34:302910.1023/A:1004650126890 ↗
5. Baley C (2004) J Mater Sci 39:33110.1023/B:JMSC.0000007768.63055.ae ↗
6. Focher B, Marzetti A, Sharma HSS (1992) In: Sharma HSS, Van Sumere CF (eds) The biology and processing of flax, M. Publications, Belfast, p 333. Cited from [Hughes M, Sebe G, Hague J, Hill C, Spear M, Mott L (2000) Composite Interfaces 7:13]
7. Koch G, Bauch J, Dünisch O, Seehann G, Schmitt U (1996) Holz Roh Werkst 54:24310.1007/s001070050175 ↗
8. Robinon W (1920) Phil Trans R Soc B 210:4910.1098/rstb.1921.0002 ↗
9. Page DH, El-Hosseiny F, Winkler K, Bain R (1972) Pulp Paper Mag Can 73(8):72
10. Davies GC, Bruce DM (1998) Textile Res J 68:62310.1177/004051759806800901 ↗
11. Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2003) Holzforschung 57:66110.1515/HF.2003.099 ↗
12. Robson D, Hague J (1995) In: Proceedings of the conference on woodfiber–plastic composites, (Forest Products Society), Madison, Wisconsin USA p 41
13. Groom L, Mott L, Shaler SM (2002) Wood Fiber Sci 34:14
14. Burgert I, Eder M, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2005) Holzforschung 59:35410.1515/HF.2005.058 ↗
15. Thygesen A (2005) Optimisation and characterisation of hemp fibres needed to go from the plant to fibres in composite materials, Ph.D. Thesis, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark
16. Kibblewhite RP (1976) Cellulose Chem. Technol 10:497
17. Ander P, Burgert I, Frühmann K (2003) In: Salmén L (ed) Proceedings of the second international conference of the European society for wood mechanics (ESWM), May 25th–28th, Stockholm, Sweden, p 63