journal article·2010-09

Interfacial ultrafine-grained structures on aluminum alloy 6061 joint and copper alloy 110 joint fabricated by magnetic pulse welding

Yuan Zhang, Sudarsanam Suresh Babu, Glenn S. Daehn

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Magnetic pulse welding is a solid state impact welding process, similar to explosive welding, which produces metallurgical bond by oblique high-speed impact between two metal bodies. This violent impact removes the metal surface oxide layers and then joins the two atomic level clean metal surfaces together by the incidental compression pressure. The impact velocity is at 200–400 m/s and the being welded metal surface undergoes severe plastic deformation with strain rate in the order of 106–107 s−1. The ultrafine-grained structure was observed on the welded interface. This article studied two types of similar material lap joint interfaces and the base metals were aluminum alloy 6061 and copper alloy 110. Nano-indentation testing shows that the welded interfaces have significantly greater hardness than the base metals. The interface microstructure was studied by optical microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The welded aluminum alloy 6061 interface exhibits extremely fine grains and an extremely high dislocation density. The impact welded copper alloy 110 interface presents nano-scale lamellar band structure and deformation twins. The interface hardness increasing was attributed to this impact-induced microstructural refinement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang Y et al (2008) Sci Technol Weld Join 13(5):46710.1179/174329308X341915 ↗
2. Zhang Y et al (2010) J Mater Process Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.001 ↗
3. Iwahashi Y et al (1998) Acta Mater 46(9):331710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00494-1 ↗
4. Hayes JS, Keyte R, Prangnell PB (2000) Mater Sci Technol 16:1259–126310.1179/026708300101507479 ↗
5. Tsuji N et al (2002) Scripta Mater 46(4):30510.1016/S1359-6462(01)01243-X ↗
6. Valiev RZ et al (2002) J Mater Res 17(1):610.1557/JMR.2002.0002 ↗
7. Morris DG, Gutierrez-Urrutia I, Muñoz-Morris MA (2007) J Mater Sci 42(5):1439. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0564-z10.1007/s10853-006-0564-z ↗
8. Zhang Y et al (2008) In: 10th international LS-DYNA users conference simulation technology, 2008, Dearborn, MI
9. Johnson JR et al (2009) Metal Form 80(5):359
10. Masumoto I, Tamaki K, Kojima M (1985) Trans Jpn Weld Soc 16(2):110
11. Lee KJ et al (2007) Mater Sc Eng A 471(1–2):95
12. Hokari H et al (1998) Weld Int 12(8):61910.1080/09507119809452024 ↗
13. Aizawa T, Kashani M, Okagawa K (2007) Weld J 86:119s
14. Zhang Y, Babu SS, Daehn GS (2010) In: 4th international conference on high speed forming, 2010, Columbus, OH. Handle-ID: http://hdl.handle.net/2003/27194
15. Zhilyaev AP et al (2008) J Mater Sci 43(23):7451. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2714-y10.1007/s10853-008-2714-y ↗
16. Hughes DA, Hansen N (2001) Phys Rev Lett 87(13):13550310.1103/PhysRevLett.87.135503 ↗
17. Hughes DA et al (1995) Wear 181:45810.1016/0043-1648(95)90159-0 ↗
18. Bussiba A et al (2001) Mater Sci Eng A 302(1):5610.1016/S0921-5093(00)01354-X ↗
19. Mishra RS et al (1999) Scripta Mater 42(2):16310.1016/S1359-6462(99)00329-2 ↗
20. Komura S et al (1998) Scripta Mater 38(12):185110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00099-2 ↗
21. Andrade U et al (1994) Acta Metall Mater 42:318310.1016/0956-7151(94)90417-0 ↗
22. Ogata S, Li J, Yip S (2002) Science 298(5594):80710.1126/science.1076652 ↗
23. Huang X (2007) J Mater Sci 42(5):1577. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0988-510.1007/s10853-006-0988-5 ↗
24. Yamakov V et al (2002) Nat Mater 1(1):4510.1038/nmat700 ↗