Effect of carbon nanotube reinforcement on fracture strength of composite adhesive joints
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the use of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as an epoxy adhesive additive for adhesive joints between steel–composite interfaces and composite–composite interfaces. The study also examined the effect of CNT functionalization to improve CNT dispersion and thus improve joint strength. Specimens were constructed by adhesively bonding two parallel coupons, with a starting crack at one end. The specimens were loaded to final failure in three-point bending for Mode II fracture. Critical strain energy release rate was used to compare fracture properties of each set of specimens. It was shown that additions of multi-walled CNTs on the order of 1 wt% with diameters on the order of 30 nm and lengths 5–20 μm enhanced fracture toughness for both steel–composite and composite–composite adhesive joints tested. However, other combinations of CNTs could significantly decrease fracture properties, likely due to agglomeration issues. Functionalization of nanotubes showed some limited promise. Scanning electron microscopy validated the improved dispersion of CNTs using functionalization, but also highlighted the shortening effects due to the harsh chemical treatment. In summary, the study illustrates the importance of various CNT parameters on fracture properties, and encourages further investigation and optimization of these parameters for applications of interest.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Mouritz AP, Gellert E, Burchill P, Challis K (2001) Compos Struct 53:2110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00175-6 ↗
2. Jones R, Alesi H (2000) Compos Struct 50:41710.1016/S0263-8223(00)00108-2 ↗
3. Gates D (2009) Boeing 787 May Not Fly this Year. The Seattle Times, 22 July 2009
4. Kwon YW, Marron A (2009) Appl Compos Mater 16:36510.1007/s10443-009-9104-8 ↗
5. Kwon YW, Slaff R, Bartlett S, Green T (2008) J Mater Sci 43:6695. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2689-810.1007/s10853-008-2689-8 ↗
6. Faulkner SD, Kwon YW, Bartlett S, Rasmussen EA (2009) J Mater Sci 44:2858. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-3378-y10.1007/s10853-009-3378-y ↗
7. Bily MA, Kwon YW, Pollak RD (2010) Appl Compos Mater 17:34710.1007/s10443-009-9124-4 ↗
8. Kwon YW, Schultz W, Loup DC, Rasmussen EA. ASME J Press Vessel Technol (accepted)
9. Klopfer J (2009) An experimental study of fiberglass composites containing metal-wire joints. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School
10. Sun Y, Meguid SA, Liew KM, Ong LS (2004) Nanotechnology 3:126
11. Gojny FH, Wichmann MHG, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Compos Sci Technol 64:236310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
12. Andrews PM, Jacques D, Minot M, Rantell T (2002) Macro Mater Eng 287:39510.1002/1439-2054(20020601)287:6<395::AID-MAME395>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
13. Qian D, Dickey EC, Andrews R, Rantell T (2000) Appl Phys Lett 76:286810.1063/1.126500 ↗
14. Breton Y, Desarmot G, Salvetat JP, Delpeux S, Sinturel C, Berguin F, Bonnamy S (2004) Carbon 42:102710.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.026 ↗
15. Shen J, Huang W, Wu L, Hu Y, Ye M (2007) Compos Sci Technol 67:304110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.025 ↗
16. Liu L, Wagner HD (2005) Compos Sci Technol 65:186110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.04.002 ↗
17. Zou W, Du Z, Liu Y, Yang X, Li H, Zhang C (2008) Compos Sci Technol 68:325910.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.011 ↗
18. Kim JY, Han SI, Hong S (2008) Polymer 49:333510.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.024 ↗