Effect of silane coupling agent on mechanical performance of glass fibre
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical performance of commercially manufactured unsized and γ-APS sized boron-free E-glass fibres has been characterised using single fibre tensile test. Both apparent fibre modulus and fibre strength were found to strongly depend on fibre gauge length. The average strength of sized fibres was found 40%-80% higher than unsized fibres at different gauge lengths. Weibull analysis suggested that the failure mode of unsized fibres could be described by unimodal Weibull distribution, whereas the strength distribution of sized fibres appeared to be controlled by two exclusive types of flaw population, type A and B. Comparison of the Weibull plots between unsized and sized fibres revealed that the strength of unsized fibres was likely to be dominated by type A flaws existing on the bare glass surface and type B flaws may be related to the defects on the glass surface coated with silane. This was partially supported by the observation of fractured cross-sectional area using SEM. It was, therefore, proposed that the strength difference between unsized and sized glass fibres may be more reasonably interpreted from the surface protection standpoint as opposed to the flaw healing effect. The results obtained from this work showed that silane coupling agent plays a critical role in the strength retention of commercially manufactured E-glass fibres and the silane effect on the fibre strength is also affected by the change in gauge length of the sample.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Kolesov YI, Kudryavtsev MY, Mikhailenko NY (2001) Glass Ceram 58(5):197. doi: 10.1023/a:101238681424810.1023/A:1012386814248 ↗
2. Wallenberger FT, Watson JC, Li H (2001) Glass fibres, vol 21. ASM handbook. ASM International, Material Park
3. Lowenstein KL (1993) The manufacturing technology of continuous glass fibres. Elsevier, Amsterdam
4. Bartenev GM, Sidorov AB (1965) Glass Ceram 22(9):59710.1007/BF00690491 ↗
5. Otto WH (1955) J Am Ceram Soc 38(3):122. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1955.tb14588.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1955.tb14588.x ↗
6. Schmitz GK, Metcalfe AG (1966) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 5(1):1. doi: 10.1021/i360017a00110.1021/i360017a001 ↗
7. Gupta PK (2002) In: Elices M, Llorca J (eds) Fiber fracture. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, p 12710.1016/B978-008044104-7/50008-3 ↗
8. Thomason JL, Kalinka G (2001) Composites A 32(1):85. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00122-610.1016/S1359-835X(00)00122-6 ↗
9. Thomason JL, Adzima LJ (2001) Composites A 32(3–4):313. doi: 10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00124-x10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X ↗
10. Reilly SP, Thomason JL (2010) In: Paper presented at the 14th European conference on composite materials, ECCM14, Budapest, Hungary
11. Zinck P, Pay MF, Rezakhanlou R, Gerard JF (1999) J Mater Sci 34(9):2121. doi: 10.1023/A:100457211247010.1023/A:1004572112470 ↗
12. Zinck P, Mäder E, Gerard JF (2001) J Mater Sci 36(21):5245. doi: 10.1023/A:101241031560110.1023/A:1012410315601 ↗
13. Otto WH (1961) J Am Ceram Soc 44(2):68. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb15352.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb15352.x ↗
14. Sakka S (1957) Bull Inst Chem Res Kyoto Univ 34(6):316
15. Feih S, Boiocchi E, Mathys G, Mathys Z, Gibson AG, Mouritz AP (2011) Composites B 42(3):350. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2010.12.020 ↗
16. Feih S, Thraner A, Lilholt H (2005) J Mater Sci 40(7):1615. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-0661-410.1007/s10853-005-0661-4 ↗
17. Thomason JL (2007) Polym Compos 28(3):331. doi: 10.1002/pc.2026010.1002/pc.20260 ↗
18. Thomason JL (1999) Compos Sci Technol 59(16):2315. doi: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00083-410.1016/S0266-3538(99)00083-4 ↗
19. Thomason JL (1995) Composites 26(7):477. doi: 10.1016/0010-4361(95)96805-g10.1016/0010-4361(95)96805-G ↗
20. Metcalfe AG, Schmitz GK (1964) Proc ASTM 64:1075
21. Schmitz GK, Metcalfe AG (1965) In: 20th Anniversary technical conference, 1965. The Society of the Plastics Industry, Washington, DC
22. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Handlingar, Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences 151
23. Weibull W (1951) J Appl Mech 18:29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
24. Thomason JL (2012) Compos Sci Technol (Submitted)
25. Andersons J, Joffe R, Hojo M, Ochiai S (2002) Compos Sci Technol 62(1):131. doi: 10.1016/s0266-3538(01)00182-810.1016/S0266-3538(01)00182-8 ↗
26. Beetz CP Jr (1982) Fibre Sci Technol 16(1):45. doi: 10.1016/0015-0568(82)90015-x10.1016/0015-0568(82)90015-X ↗
27. Beetz CP (1982) Fibre Sci Technol 16(2):81. doi: 10.1016/0015-0568(82)90027-610.1016/0015-0568(82)90027-6 ↗
28. Zinck P, Gérard JF, Wagner HD (2002) Eng Fract Mech 69(9):1049. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7944(01)00121-710.1016/S0013-7944(01)00121-7 ↗
29. Zinck P, Pays MF, Rezakhanlou R, Gerard JF (1999) Philos Mag A 79(9):210310.1080/01418619908210411 ↗