Cellulose microfibril angles in a spruce branch and mechanical implications
Source abstract
Abstract
The nanostructure of the wood cell wall and, in particular the tilt angle of the cellulose fibrils versus the longitudinal cell axis (microfibril angle, MFA), are known to play a key role in determining the mechanical properties of wood. A variation of microfibril angles during growth may therefore be regarded as a means to adapt to different loading situations. In the present study, a branch of Norway spruce (Picea abies) was used as a model system. The change of microfibril angles with increasing age and size of the branch and therefore increasing gravitational load was systematically investigated. Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) was applied to obtain a map of MFA all over the branch as a function of the distance from the trunk within each annual ring. It was found that in compression wood the MFA decreased continuously from the trunk towards the tip in all annual rings. In opposite wood, however, the course of microfibril angles was found to change considerably with the age of the branch: in the outer annual rings, very small microfibril angles occurred in the middle part of the branch. The results are discussed in view of the mechanical implications of different microfibril angles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. K. J. Niklas, “Plant Biomechanics: An Engineering Approach to Plant Form and Function” (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1992).
2. C. Mattheck and H. Kubler, “Wood-The Internal Optimization of Trees” (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
3. D. Fengel and G. Wegener, “Wood. Chemistry, Ultrastructure, ReactionsWood. Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions”(Walter de Gruyter. Berlin/New York, 1989).
4. I. D. Cave and J. C. F. Walker, Forest Products Journal 44(5) (1994) 43.
5. A. Reiterer, H. Lichtenegger, S. E. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, Phil. Mag. A 79 (1999) 2173.10.1080/01418619908210415 ↗
6. P. W. Lee and Y. G. Eom, IAWA Bulletin n.s. 9(3) (1988) 275.10.1163/22941932-90001077 ↗
7. J. Kocon, Ann. Warsaw Agricult. Univ.-SGGW-AR, For. and Wood Technol. 38 (1988) 9.
8. N. Yoshizawa, I. Satoh, S. Yokota and T. Idei, IAWA Bulletin n.s. 13(2) (1992) 187.10.1163/22941932-90001267 ↗
9. T. E. Timell, Wood Sci. and Technol. 7 (1973) 79.10.1007/BF00351152 ↗
10. T. E. Timell, ibid. 12 (1978) 89.10.1007/BF00350815 ↗
11. A. H. Westing, Bot. Rev. 31 (1965) 381.10.1007/BF02859131 ↗
12. A. B. Wardrop and H. E. Dadswell, Australian J. of Scientific Research B 3(1) (1950) 1.
13. A. Reiterer, H. F. Jakob, S. E. Stanzl-Tschegg and P. Fratzl, Wood Science and Technology 32 (1998) 335.10.1007/BF00702790 ↗
14. D. H. Page, F. El-Hosseiny and K. Winkler, Nature 229 (1971) 252.10.1038/229252a0 ↗
15. D. H. Page and F. El-Hosseiny, J. Pulp Paper Sci. 9(4) (1983).
16. H. Lichtenegger, A. Reiterer, S. E. Stanzltschegg and P. Fratzl, J. Struct. Biology 128 (1999) 257.10.1006/jsbi.1999.4194 ↗
17. P. Fratzl, H. F. Jakob, S. Rinnerthaler, P. Roschger and K. Klaushofer, J. Appl. Cryst. 30 (1997) 765.10.1107/S0021889897001775 ↗
18. H. F. Jakob, P. Fratzl and S. E. Tschegg, J. Struct. Biol. 113 (1994) 13.10.1006/jsbi.1994.1028 ↗
19. H. F. Jakob, D. Fengel, S. E. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, Macromol. 28 (1995) 8782.10.1021/ma00130a010 ↗
20. H. F. Jakob, S. E. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, ibid. 29(26) (1996) 8435.10.1021/ma9605661 ↗
21. H. Lichtenegger, A. Reiterer, S. E. Tschegg and P. Fratzl, in Proc. of the InternationalWorkshop on the Signifi-cance of Microfibril Angle toWood Quality,Westport, NewZealand, November 1997, edited by B. G. Butterfield (1998).
22. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschitz, “Theory of Elasticity (Course of Theoretical Physics, 7)” (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1986).
23. L. J. Gibson and M. F. Ashby, “Cellular Solids, Structure and Properties” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
24. A. Reiterer, H. Lichtenegger, P. Fratzl and S. E. Stanzl-Tschegg, J. Mat. Sci., in press.
25. E. W. J. Phillips, Empire Forestry Journal 20 (1941) 74.
26. J. D. Boyd, Wood Sci. and Technol. 7 (1973) 92.10.1007/BF00351153 ↗
27. W. A. CÔTÉ, A. C. Day and T. E. Timell, ibid. 2 (1968) 13.10.1007/BF00366409 ↗