journal article·2004-06

Influence of residual stresses in the performance of cold-drawn pearlitic wires

M. Elices

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The mechanical properties of cold-drawn pearlitic wires are controlled largely by the microstructure developed during processing and, to some extent, by the residual stresses during drawing. The advent of powerful computers and the availability of equipment to perform diffraction experiments, have made possible numerical predictions and accurate measurements of residual stresses. This paper—a review of work done by the author and collaborators—shows how stress-relaxation losses, environmental assisted cracking and fatigue life of cold-drawn pearlitic wires are influenced by residual stresses. The role of pre-stretching loads, or of stress relieving treatments, on stress-relaxation can be understood when the profile of residual stresses is known. Some awkward results in times to fracture during hydrogen embrittlement tests can be explained if accurate values of residual stresses near the surface are known, and the same is true of fatigue life. In this context numerical simulations and measurements performed on cold-drawn pearlitic wires, with different profiles of residual stresses, have shown very good quantitative agreement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. T. Tarui, T. Takahashi, H. Tashiro and S. Nishida, in “Metallurgy, Processing and Applications of Metal Wires,” edited by H. G. Paris and D. K. Kim (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1996).
2. J. M. Garcia-Monar, (private communication).
3. A. B. Dove, in “Ferrous Wire” (The Wire Association International Inc., 1989) Chap. 1.
4. J. D. Embury and R. M. Fisher Acta Metall. 14 (1966) 147; E. M. TALEFF, C. K. SYN, D. R. LESUER and O. D. SHERBYMetall. Mater. Trans. A 27 (1996) 111.10.1016/0001-6160(66)90296-3 ↗
5. E. M. Taleff, J. J. Lewandowski and B. Pourladian JOM, July (2002) 25.10.1007/BF02700982 ↗
6. N. J. Gimsing, “Cable Supported Bridges” (John Wiley & Sons, 1997).
7. T. Takahashi, I. Ochiai and H. Satoh, Nippon Steel Tech. Report N53, 1992.
8. M. Elices Informes de la Construcción 396 (1988) 5. (In Spanish).10.3989/ic.1988.v40.i396.1548 ↗
9. M. Elices, in “Fracture Mechanics of Concrete,” edited by G. C. Sih and A. DiTommaso (Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 1985) Chap. 5.
10. B. Pourladian and D. Hare Wire J. Intern. July (2002) 77.
11. K. F. Mcguinn and M. Elices Brit. Corros. J. 16 (1981) 187.10.1179/000705981798274751 ↗
12. M. A. Astiz, A. Valiente, M. Elices and H. D. Bui, in “Life Assessment of Dynamically Loaded Materials and Structures” edited by L. Faria (1984) Vol. 1, p. 385.
13. O. C. Zienkiewicz and R. L. Taylor, “The Finite Element Method” (McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1989).
14. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, “ABAQUS User's Manual, Version 5.8,” 1988.
15. A. J. L. Crook and E. Hinton, in Proceedings 1st. Int. Conf. on Computational Plasticity, Barcelona (Pineridge Press Ltd., 1987) p. 181.
16. K. J. Bathe, M. Kojic and J. Walczak, in Proceedings 2nd. Int. Conf. on Computational Plasticity, Barcelona (Pineridge Press Ltd., 1989) p. 263.
17. T. Hamada, T. Hirouchi and M. Akiyama Wire J. Intern. May (2001) 86.
18. J. M. Atienza, “Residual stresses in drawn steel wires,” Ph.D. Thesis. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2001.
19. E. Macherauch and K. H. Kloos, in Proceedings Int. Conf. on Residual Stresses, Garmish 1986 (Oberursel 1987) p. 310.1016/B978-0-08-034062-3.50033-1 ↗
20. P. VAN HOUTTE and L. DE BUYSERActa Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) 323.10.1016/0956-7151(93)90063-X ↗
21. J. M. Atienza and M. Elices Mater. Struct. 37 (2004).10.1007/BF02481675 ↗
22. J. M. Atienza, M. Martinez, F. J. Mompean, M. Garcia-Hernandez, J. Ruiz and M. Elices, in Proceedings 14th European Conference on Fracture, edited by A. Neimitz et al. (EMAS Pub., 2002) p. 113.
23. K. Van Acker, J. Root, P. Van Houtte and E. Aernoudt Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 4039; J. RUIZ, J. M. ATIENZA and M. ELICESJ. Mater. Engng. Perform. 12 (2003) 480.10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00051-1 ↗
24. Model Code CEB-FIP (1990). ASTM-A421 (1991). BS-2691 (1991).
25. J. R. Libby, “Modern Prestressed Concrete” (van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1977).
26. J. M. Atienza and M. Elices Mater. Struct. 36 (2003) 262.10.1007/BF02480832 ↗
27. ASTM E328-86 Standard Test Methods for Stress Relaxation Tests for Materials and Structures (1996).
28. J. M. Atienza (private communication).
29. S. Suresh, “Fatigue of Materials” (Cambridge U.P., 1998).10.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
30. J. Llorca and V. Sanchez-Galvez, in “Computational Plasticity,” edited by D. R. J. Owen, E. Hinton and E. Oñate (Pineridge Publ., 1987) p. 1123.
31. J. Llorca Fatigue Fract Engng. Struct. 12 (1989) 31.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1989.tb00506.x ↗
32. K. Katagiri, T. Sato, K. Kasaba, S. Sasaki and H. Tashiro ibid. 22 (1999) 753.10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00212.x ↗
33. D. G. Enos and J. R. Scully Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33 (2002) 1151.10.1007/s11661-002-0217-z ↗
34. FIP-78, “Stress Corrosion Test”, Technical Report 5 (Wexham Springs, 1978).
35. M. Elices, G. Maeder and V. Sanchez-Galvez Brit. Corr. J. 18 (1983) 80.10.1179/bcj.1983.18.2.80 ↗
36. V. Sanchez-Galvez and M. Elices, in “Life Assessment of Dynamically Loaded Materials and Structures,” edited by L. Faria, (1984), p. 1003.
37. M. Elices, J. Ruiz and J. M. Atienza Mater. Struct. 37 (2004).10.1007/BF02481676 ↗
38. N. Ibaraki, K. Makii, K. Ochiai and Y. Oki Wire J. Intern. March (2000) 122.