Connecting the macro- and microstrain responses in technical porous ceramics: modeling and experimental validations
Source abstract
Abstract
The relation between the macroscopic and the microscopic (lattice) strain response to external uniaxial stress has been investigated for porous ceramics. Analytical and finite element modeling (FEM) have been performed and neutron diffraction data on porous sintered alumina and extruded honeycomb SiC have been used to validate the theoretical approach. By FEM simulations, it is shown that in spite of the complex pore microstructure, shear stresses are small during uniaxial compression. Analytical modeling shows that while the average microscopic stress depends on the applied macroscopic stress only through the porosity p, the average microscopic strain depends on the macroscopic stress through the pore morphology factor m, as well. Novel relationships are proposed to describe this dependence. Analytical calculations and numerical modeling perfectly agree with each other, and both show good consistency with experiments. As predicted, it has been observed that the microscopic (diffraction) Young’s modulus does not depend on the pore morphology factor, and follows the rule-of-mixtures, while the microscopic Poisson’s ratio does not even depend on porosity, but is equal to the value for the dense material property. A practical implication of these findings is that it is not possible to attach a pore morphology factor to a material, unless the processing conditions are tailored to vary p without varying m. In fact, the different values of m found for the different porosities explain why many models can be used to rationalize the experimental data. With the proposed method, the factor m can be independently evaluated by the use of macro- and micro-elastic properties of the porous body. Analogously, the macroscopic elastic properties of the dense material can be obtained by macroscopic and microscopic values measured on the correspondent porous material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Green DJ, Nader C, Brezny R (1990) In: Handwerker CA, Blendell JE, Gysser WA (eds) Ceramic transactions, vol 7, Sintering of advanced ceramics. American Ceramic Society, Westerville
2. Knudsen FP (1962) J Am Ceram Soc 45:9410.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11089.x ↗
3. Spriggs RM (1961) J Am Ceram Soc 44:62810.1111/j.1151-2916.1961.tb11671.x ↗
4. Pabst W, Gregorová E (2006) In: Caruta BM (ed) Ceramics and composite materials. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 31–100
5. Dean EA, Lopez JA (1983) J Am Ceram Soc 66:36610.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10051.x ↗
6. Munro RG (2001) J Am Ceram Soc 84:119010.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00815.x ↗
7. Green DJ (1998) An introduction to the mechanical properties of ceramics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 88–9410.1017/CBO9780511623103 ↗
8. Wang JC (1984) J Mater Sci 19:809. doi:10.1007/BF0054045210.1007/BF00540452 ↗
9. Sudduth RD (1995) J Mater Sci 30:4451. doi:10.1007/BF0036153110.1007/BF00361531 ↗
10. Ramakrishnan N, Arunachalam VS (1990) J Mater Sci 25:3930. doi:10.1007/BF0058246210.1007/BF00582462 ↗
11. Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2000) J Am Ceram Soc 83:304110.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01680.x ↗
12. Kachanov M, Tsukrov I, Shafiro B (1994) Appl Mech Rev 47:15110.1115/1.3122810 ↗
13. Frishbutter A, Neov D, Scheffzük C, Vrana M, Walther K (2000) J Struct Geol 22:158710.1016/S0191-8141(00)00110-3 ↗
14. Darling TW, TenCate JA, Brown DW, Clausen B, Vogel SC (2004) Geophys Res Lett 31:1660410.1029/2004GL020463 ↗
15. Nikitin AN, Ivankina TI, Soboilev GA, Scheffzük C, Frishbutter A, Walther K (2004) Izvestyia Phys Sol Earth 40:83 (translated from Fizika Zemli (2004) 1:88)
16. Kröner E (1958) Z Phys 151:50410.1007/BF01337948 ↗
17. Reuss A (1929) Z Angew Math Mech 9:4910.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
18. Berryman JG (1997) Phys Rev Lett 79:114210.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1142 ↗
19. Gebert JM, Wanner A, Piat R, Guichard M, Rieck S, Paluszynski B, Böhlke T (2008) Mech Adv Mater Struct 15:46710.1080/15376490802138856 ↗
20. Batzle ML, Simmons G, Siegfried RW (1980) J Geophys Res 85:707210.1029/JB085iB12p07072 ↗
21. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1982) Proc R Soc Lond A382:43–59
22. Pabst W, Gregorova E (2007) Ceram Int 33:910.1016/j.ceramint.2005.07.009 ↗
23. Phani K, Niyogi SK (1987) J Mater Sci 22:257. doi:10.1007/BF0116058110.1007/BF01160581 ↗
24. Timoshenko S, Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of plates and shells. Springer, New York
25. Rossi RC (1968) J Am Ceram Soc 51:43310.1111/j.1151-2916.1968.tb11914.x ↗
26. Pozdnyakova I, Bruno G, Efremov AM, Clausen B, Hughes DJ (2009) Adv Eng Mater 11:102310.1002/adem.200900192 ↗
27. Hauk V (1997) Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods: evaluation—application—assessment. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
28. Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1987) Residual stress: measurement by diffraction and interpretation. Springer-Verlag, New York10.1007/978-1-4613-9570-6 ↗
29. Webster PJ (1991) In: Hutchings MT, Krawitz AD (eds) Measurement of residual and applied stress using neutron diffraction. NATO Series E 216, Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht
30. Hughes DJ, Bruno G, Pirling T, Withers PJ (2006) Neutron News 17:2810.1080/10448630600837549 ↗
31. Rietveld HM (1968) J Appl Crystallogr 2:6510.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
32. Larson AC, Von Dreele RB (2004) General structure analysis system (GSAS). LANL Report LAUR 86–748
33. Bourke MAM, Dunand DC, Üstündag E (2002) Appl Phys A 74:S170710.1007/s003390201747 ↗
34. Pabst W, Gregorová E (2004) J Mater Sci 39:3501. doi:10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026961.12735.2a10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026961.12735.2a ↗
35. Kamitani K, Grimsditch M, Nipko JC, Loong CK, Okada M, Kimura I (1997) J Appl Phys 82:315210.1063/1.366100 ↗
36. Tolpygo KB (1961) Sov Phys Solid State 2:2367
37. Daymond MR, Bourke MAM, Von Dreele RB (1999) J Appl Phys 85:73910.1063/1.369154 ↗
38. Tefft WE (1966) J Res Natl Bur Stand 70A:27710.6028/jres.070A.024 ↗
39. Wern H (2000) XEC Program, Ottweiler, D
40. Wang JC (1984) J Mater Sci 19:801. doi:10.1007/BF0054045110.1007/BF00540451 ↗
41. Chaix JM (2009) Mater Sci Forum 624:110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.624.1 ↗
42. Pampuch R (1979) Ceram Int 5:7610.1016/0390-5519(79)90033-4 ↗
43. Jung Y, Chu KT, Torquato S (2007) J Comput Phys 223:71110.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.007 ↗
44. Knudsen FP (1959) J Am Ceram Soc 42:37610.1111/j.1151-2916.1959.tb13596.x ↗