journal article·2026-01-13

Enhancing Triboelectric Output via Plasma-Engineered Surface Roughness on PDMS Films

Gi Hyeon Han

Publisher page

Abstract

For triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) operating under tight footprint limits, raising output per unit area is essential. Here, we use oxygen-plasma treatment as a single, scalable knob to control the surface roughness of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and examine how this affects device output. Plasma exposure generates micro/nanoscale wrinkles (and, at long times, hierarchical textures) without changing bulk composition. Surface topography is quantified by AFM using root-mean-square roughness (R q ) and the developed surface area ratio (S dr ), and the morphology is cross-checked by SEM. We find that roughness increases monotonically with plasma time and the TENG output rises in parallel. Under our test conditions, open-circuit voltage ( V oc ) shows a stronger quantitative association with R q, whereas short-circuit current (I sc ) correlates more closely with S dr . Because R q and S dr covary during oxygen-plasma treatment, these results are interpreted as quantitative associations rather than causal proof. Overall, the study provides a simple, lithography-free route and clear roughness-to-performance guidelines for achieving high output density in PDMS-based TENG.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Yonsei University

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn404614z10.1021/nn404614z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.00410.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.03410.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.034 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5EE01532D10.1039/C5EE01532D ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.00110.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.001 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11431-020-1604-910.1007/s11431-020-1604-9 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40544-020-0390-310.1007/s40544-020-0390-3 ↗
8. 10.1002/eom2.1209310.1002/eom2.12093 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.01610.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.016 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7RA07623A10.1039/C7RA07623A ↗
12. 10.1039/C8SM01910J10.1039/C8SM01910J ↗
13. 10.1163/156856194X0094210.1163/156856194X00942 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.02.00410.1016/j.mee.2008.02.004 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.346688210.1063/1.3466882 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1418532610.3390/ma14185326 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11249-023-01700-z10.1007/s11249-023-01700-z ↗
18. 10.3390/app1512657310.3390/app15126573 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10707010.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107070 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10506710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105067 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.724210.1103/PhysRevB.30.7242 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.313184410.1063/1.3131844 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2023.11199410.1016/j.mee.2023.111994 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10796410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107964 ↗