Enhancing Triboelectric Output via Plasma-Engineered Surface Roughness on PDMS Films
Source abstract
Abstract
For triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) operating under tight footprint limits, raising output per unit area is essential. Here, we use oxygen-plasma treatment as a single, scalable knob to control the surface roughness of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and examine how this affects device output. Plasma exposure generates micro/nanoscale wrinkles (and, at long times, hierarchical textures) without changing bulk composition. Surface topography is quantified by AFM using root-mean-square roughness (R q ) and the developed surface area ratio (S dr ), and the morphology is cross-checked by SEM. We find that roughness increases monotonically with plasma time and the TENG output rises in parallel. Under our test conditions, open-circuit voltage ( V oc ) shows a stronger quantitative association with R q, whereas short-circuit current (I sc ) correlates more closely with S dr . Because R q and S dr covary during oxygen-plasma treatment, these results are interpreted as quantitative associations rather than causal proof. Overall, the study provides a simple, lithography-free route and clear roughness-to-performance guidelines for achieving high output density in PDMS-based TENG.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Yonsei University
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn404614z10.1021/nn404614z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.00410.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.03410.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.034 ↗
4. 10.1039/C5EE01532D10.1039/C5EE01532D ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.00110.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.001 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11431-020-1604-910.1007/s11431-020-1604-9 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40544-020-0390-310.1007/s40544-020-0390-3 ↗
8. 10.1002/eom2.1209310.1002/eom2.12093 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.011 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.01610.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.016 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7RA07623A10.1039/C7RA07623A ↗
12. 10.1039/C8SM01910J10.1039/C8SM01910J ↗
13. 10.1163/156856194X0094210.1163/156856194X00942 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.02.00410.1016/j.mee.2008.02.004 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.346688210.1063/1.3466882 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma1418532610.3390/ma14185326 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11249-023-01700-z10.1007/s11249-023-01700-z ↗
18. 10.3390/app1512657310.3390/app15126573 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10707010.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107070 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10506710.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105067 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.724210.1103/PhysRevB.30.7242 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.313184410.1063/1.3131844 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mee.2023.11199410.1016/j.mee.2023.111994 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10796410.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107964 ↗