The radial reinforcement of the wood structure and its implication on mechanical and fracture mechanical properties—A comparison between two tree species
Source abstract
Abstract
The radial direction of wood is reinforced by an additional tissue called rays. These rays are one of the reasons for the anisotropy of wood in the transverse plane. In this paper the influence of rays on the mechanical properties like tensile strength as well as on fracture mechanical parameters like critical stress intensity factor and specific fracture energy is shown. By investigating two deciduous tree species with a similar wood structure in general but a different ray characteristic in particular the importance of this radial reinforcement of the wood structure could be demonstrated. The relevance for the living tree is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. H. HÖRIG, Ing.-Arch. 6 (1935) 8.10.1007/BF02086407 ↗
2. Idem.,ibid. 8 (1937) 1.
3. L. J. GIBSON and M. F. ASHBY, “Cellular solids. Cambridge Solid State Sci. Ser., ” 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
4. K. J. NIKLAS, “Plant Biomechanics” (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1992).
5. E. KAHLE and J. J. WOODHOUSE, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 1250.10.1007/BF00975072 ↗
6. I. BURGERT and D. ECKSTEIN, Trees 15 (2001) 168.10.1007/s004680000086 ↗
7. Y. KAWAMURA, Mokuzai Gakkaishi 30 (1984a) 201.
8. Idem., ibid. 30 (1984b) 785.
9. E. BADEL and P. PERRÉ, Ann. For. Sci. 56 (1999) 467.10.1051/forest:19990603 ↗
10. I. BURGERT, A. BERNASCONI and D. ECKSTEIN, Holz Roh-Werkst. 57 (1999) 397.10.1007/s001070050367 ↗
11. I. BURGERT, A. BERNASCONI, K. J. NIKLAS and D. ECKSTEIN, Holzforschung 55, in press.
12. W. H. BEERY, G. IFJU and E. MC LAIN, Wood Fiber Sci. 15 (1983) 395.
13. A. P. SCHNIEWIND, Forest Prod. J. 9 (1959) 350.
14. E. K. TSCHEGG, Equipment and Appropriate Specimen Shape for Tests to Measure FractureValues (in German), PatentAT-390328 (1986).
15. H. HARMUTH, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 23 (1995) 103.10.1016/0167-8442(95)00008-3 ↗
16. S. E. STANZL-TSCHEGG, D. M. TAN and E.K. TSCHEGG, Wood Sci. Technol. 29 (1995) 31.10.1021/es00001a753 ↗
17. Idem.,Int. J. Fract. 75 (1996) 347.10.1007/BF00019614 ↗
18. A. REITERER, S. E. STANZL-TSCHEGG and E.K. TSCHEGG, Wood Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 417.10.1007/s002260000056 ↗
19. H. SCHACHNER, A. REITERER and S. E. STANZLTSCHEGG, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 19 (2000) 1783.10.1023/A:1006703718032 ↗
20. P. NIEMZ, “Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe” (DRWVerlag, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, 1993).
21. R. WAGENFÜHR, “Holzatlas” (Carl Hanser Verlag, Leipzig, 2000).
22. H. HARMUTH, K. RIEDER, M. KROBATH and E. K. TSCHEGG, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 214 (1996) 53.10.1016/0921-5093(96)10221-5 ↗
23. R. L. YOUNGS, U.S. For. Prod. Lab., Madison, Wis. Rept 2079 (1957).
24. M. GOULET, Holz Roh-Werkst. 18 (1960) 325.10.1007/BF02627591 ↗
25. D. FENGEL and G. WEGENER, “Wood—Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions” (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1989).
26. C. MATTHECK and H. KUBLER, “Wood—the Internal Optimization of Trees” (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995).