journal article·2008-10

Review of the role of the interphase in the control of composite performance on micro- and nano-length scales

J. Jancar

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

In fiber reinforced composites (FRCs), exhibiting heterogeneous structure at multiple length scales, the interphase phenomena at various length scales were shown to be of pivotal importance for the control of the performance and reliability of such structures. Various models based on continuum mechanics were used to describe effects of the macro- and meso-scale interphase on the mechanical response of laminates and large FRC parts, satisfactorilly. At the micro-scale, the interphase is considered a 3D continuum with ascribed average properties. Number of continuum mechanics models was derived over the last 50 years to describe the stress transfer between matrix and individual fiber with realtively good success. In these models, the interphase was characterized by some average shear strength, τa, and elastic modulus, Ea. On the other hand, models for tranforming the properties of the micro-scale interphase around individual fiber into the mechanical response of macroscopic multifiber composite have not been generally successfull. The anisotropy of these composite structures are the main reasons causing the failure of these models. The strong thickness dependence of the elastic modulus of the micro-scale interphase suggested the presence of its underlying sub-structure. On the nano-scale, the discrete molecular structure of the polymer has to be considered. The term interphase, originally introduced for continuum matter, has to be re-defined to include the discrete nature of the matter at this length scale. The segmental immobilization resulting in retarded reptation of chains caused by interactions with solid surface seems to be the primary phenomenon which can be used to re-define term interphase on the nano-scale. Thus, the Rubinstein reptation model and a simple percolation model were used to describe immobilization of chains near solid nano-particles and to explain the peculiarities in the viscoleastic response of nano-scale “interphase.” It has also been shown that below 5 nm, Bernoulli–Euler continuum elasticity becomes not valid and higher-order elasticity along with the proposed reptation dynamics approach can provide suitable means for bridging the gap in modeling the transition between the mechanics of continuum matter at the micro-scale and mechanics of discrete matter at the nano-scale.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Pukánszky B (2005) Eur Polym J 41:64510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.035 ↗
2. DiBenedetto AT (2001) Mater Sci Eng A302:7410.1016/S0921-5093(00)01357-5 ↗
3. Hashin Z (2002) J Mech Phys Solids 50:250910.1016/S0022-5096(02)00050-9 ↗
4. Nairn JA (2007) Comput Mater Sci 40:52510.1016/j.commatsci.2007.02.010 ↗
5. Lauke B, Schuller T (2002) Comp Sci Technol 62:196510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00141-0 ↗
6. Kalfus J, Jancar J (2007) Polymer 48:393510.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.049 ↗
7. Martin RB, Burr DB, Sharkey NA (1998) Skeletal tissue mechanics. Springer, New York10.1007/978-1-4757-2968-9 ↗
8. Galiotis C (2005) In: Beaumont PWR, Soutis C (eds) Multi-scale modelling of composite material systems. Woodhead Publ. Inc., Cambridge, p 3310.1533/9781845690847.33 ↗
9. Jancar J (2006) Comp Interf 13:85310.1163/156855406779366813 ↗
10. Ji B, Gao H (2004) J Mech Phys Solids 52:196310.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.006 ↗
11. Ji B, Gao H (2006) Comp Sci Technol 66:121210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.017 ↗
12. Fantner G, Oroudjev E, Schitter G, Golde LS, Thurner P, Finch MM, Turner P, Gutsmann T, Morse DE, Hansma H, Hansma PK (2006) Biophys J 90:141110.1529/biophysj.105.069344 ↗
13. Fantner GE, Rabinovych O, Schitter G, Thurner P, Kindt JH, Finch MM, Weaver JC, Golde LS, Morse DE, Lipman EA, Rangelow IW, Hansma PK (2006) Compos Sci Technol 66:120510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.005 ↗
14. Kim J-K, Mai Y-W (1998) Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites, Ch 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 4310.1016/B978-008042695-2/50004-X ↗
15. Droste DH, DiBenedetto AT (1969) J Appl Polym Sci 13:214910.1002/app.1969.070131011 ↗
16. Cave NG, Kinloch AJ (1992) Polymer 33:116210.1016/0032-3861(92)90760-T ↗
17. Xie X-Q, Ranade SV, DiBenedetto AT (1999) Polymer 40:629710.1016/S0032-3861(99)00018-X ↗
18. Kim J-K, Mai Y-W (1998) Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites, Ch 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 9310.1016/B978-008042695-2/50005-1 ↗
19. Pluedemann EP (1982) Silane coupling agents. Plenum Press, New York10.1007/978-1-4899-0342-6 ↗
20. DiBenedetto AT, Huang SJ, Birch D, Gomes J, Lee WC (1994) Compos Struct 27:7310.1016/0263-8223(94)90069-8 ↗
21. Jancar J (2008) Polym Compos 28:1
22. Jancar J (2006) Comp Sci Technol 66:314410.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.019 ↗
23. Maranganti R, Sharma P (2007) J Mech Phys Solids 55:182310.1016/j.jmps.2007.02.011 ↗
24. Kelarakis A, Giannelis EP (2007) Polymer 48:756710.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.005 ↗
25. Narayanan RA, Thiyagarajan P, Zhu A-J, Ash BJ, Shofner M, Schadler LS, Kumar SK, Sternstein SS (2007) Polymer 48:573410.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.049 ↗
26. Eitan A, Fisher FT, Andrews R, Brinson LC, Schadler LS (2006) Comp Sci Technol 66:116210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.004 ↗
27. Yu T, Lin J, Xu J, Chen T, Lin S, Tian X (2007) Comp Sci Technol 67:321910.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.004 ↗
28. Drozdov AD, Jensen EA, Christiansen JC (2008) Int J Eng Sci 46:8710.1016/j.ijengsci.2007.09.004 ↗
29. Ha SR, Rhee KY, Kim HC, Kim JT (2008) Coll Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 313–314:11210.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.04.082 ↗
30. Cosoli P, Scocchi G, Pricl S, Fermeglia M (2008) Micropor Mesopor Mater 107:16910.1016/j.micromeso.2007.03.017 ↗
31. Jiang L, Zhang J, Wolcott MP (2007) Polymer 48:763210.1016/j.polymer.2007.11.001 ↗
32. Sternstein SS, Zhu AJ (2002) Macromolecules 35:726210.1021/ma020482u ↗
33. Kalfus J, Jancar J (2007) Polym Compos 28:36510.1002/pc.20273 ↗
34. Kalfus J, Jancar J (2007) J Polym Sci: Part B: Polym Phys 45:138010.1002/polb.21139 ↗
35. Kalfus J, Jancar J (2007) Polym Compos 28:74310.1002/pc.20331 ↗
36. Bettye L et al (1999) Nature 399:76110.1038/21607 ↗
37. Zidek J, Jancar J (2006) Key Eng Mater 334–335:857
38. Doi M, Edwards SF (2003) Theory of polymer dynamics. Oxford University Press, London
39. Lin Y-H (1985) Macromolecules 18:277910.1021/ma00154a073 ↗
40. Zheng X, Sauer BB, van Alsten JG, Schwarz SA, Rafailovich MH, Sokolov J, Rubinstein M (1995) Phys Rev Lett 74:40710.1103/PhysRevLett.74.407 ↗
41. Yoon DY, Suter UW, Sundararajan PR, Flory PJ (1975) Macromolecules 8:78410.1021/ma60048a020 ↗
42. Subbotin A, Semenov A, Doi M (1997) Phys Rev E 56:5610.1103/PhysRevE.56.623 ↗
43. deGennes P-G (1979) Scaling concepts in polymer physics. Cornell University Press, London
44. Jancar J, Kucera J, Vesely P (1991) J Mater Sci 26:487810.1007/BF00549864 ↗
45. Strobl G (2007) The physics of polymers. Springer, Berlin
46. Kouris D, Mi C (2007) Surf Sci 601:75710.1016/j.susc.2006.11.003 ↗
47. Park SK, Gao X-L (2006) J Micromech Microeng 16:235510.1088/0960-1317/16/11/015 ↗
48. Sharma P, Ganti S (2004) J Appl Mech 71:66310.1115/1.1781177 ↗
49. Sharma P, Ganti S, Bhate N (2003) Appl Phys Lett 82:53510.1063/1.1539929 ↗
50. Chen Y, Lee JD, Eskandarian A (2003) Int J Eng Sci 41:6110.1016/S0020-7225(02)00141-6 ↗
51. Chen Y, Lee JD, Eskandarian A (2004) Int J Solids Struct 41:208510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.030 ↗
52. Zang X, Sharma P, Johnsson HT (2007) Phys Rev B 75:15531910.1103/PhysRevB.75.155319 ↗
53. Nikolov S, Han CS, Rabbe D (2007) J Solids Struct 44:158210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.039 ↗