journal article·2009-08

Smart composites of urethane elastomers with carbonyl iron

Anna Boczkowska, Stefan F. Awietjan

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Smart composites based on carbonyl-iron particles in a polyurethane matrix, known as magnetorheological elastomers (MREs), were manufactured and studied. The influence of ferromagnetic particle content and particle arrangement in relation to an external magnetic field was investigated. Several different elastomers with different stiffnesses were used as matrices. It was found that the structure of a fabricated MRE depends on the viscosity of the matrix before curing and the flux density of the applied magnetic field. Two different magnetic field strengths were used: 0.1 and 0.3 T. The amount of carbonyl iron particles was varied from 1.5 to 33.0 vol%. Scanning electron microscopy technique was used to observe MRE microstructure. The particles’ orientation and their arrangement were also investigated by vibrating sample magnetometer. A correlation was found between MRE microstructure and magnetic properties. Compression tests on cylindrical samples in the presence and absence of a magnetic field showed that a magnetic field increased the stiffness of the material. Additionally the rheological properties of MREs were tested in a magnetic field. It was found that the amount of ferromagnetic particles and their arrangement have a significant influence on the rheological properties of MREs. The highest relative change of storage modulus under 200 mT magnetic field, equal to 282%, was recorded for samples with 11.5 vol% of particles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhou GY (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:13910.1088/0964-1726/12/1/316 ↗
2. Farshad M, Benine A (2004) Polym Test 23:34710.1016/S0142-9418(03)00103-X ↗
3. Jolly MR, Carlson JD, Munoz BC, Bullions TA (1996) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 7:61310.1177/1045389X9600700601 ↗
4. Khoo M, Liu C (2001) Sens Actuat A Phys 89:25910.1016/S0924-4247(00)00559-8 ↗
5. Carlson JD, Jolly MR (2000) Mechatronics 10:55510.1016/S0957-4158(99)00064-1 ↗
6. Varga Z, Filipcsei G, Zrinyi M (2005) Polymer 46:777910.1016/j.polymer.2005.03.102 ↗
7. An Y, Shaw MT (2003) Smart Mater Struct 12:15710.1088/0964-1726/12/2/301 ↗
8. Lokander M, Stenberg B (2003) Polym Test 22:24510.1016/S0142-9418(02)00043-0 ↗
9. Banks HT, Pinter GA, Potter LK, Gaitens MJ, Yanyo LC (1999) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 10:11610.1177/1045389X9901000205 ↗
10. Liu B, Shaw MT (2001) J Intel Mater Syst Struct 12:5710.1177/104538901772664214 ↗
11. Lokander M, Stenberg B (2003) Polym Test 22:67710.1016/S0142-9418(02)00175-7 ↗
12. Farshad M, Le Roux M (2004) Polym Test 23:85510.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.02.003 ↗
13. Kallio M, Aalto S, Lindroos T, Jarvinen E, Karna T, Meinander T (2003) In: Proceedings of AMAS workshop on smart materials and structures, SMART’03, Jadwisin, pp 353–360
14. Lokander M, Reitberger T, Stenberg B (2004) Polym Degrad Stabil 86:46710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.05.019 ↗
15. Farshad M, Le Roux M (2005) Polym Test 24:16310.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.09.007 ↗
16. Boczkowska A, Awietjan S.F, Wejrzanowski T, Kurzydłowski K.J (2009) J Mater Sci, in press