The effect of processing parameters on the properties of γ-alumina washcoats deposited on ceramic honeycombs
Source abstract
Abstract
The coating of cordierite honeycomb specimens with γ-alumina slurries for the preparation of washcoats for automotive applications was investigated. The dependence of slurry viscosity on factors such as the solids content, the pH and the particle size distribution of the powder used, was determined. Slurry viscosity was correlated to the loading percentage achieved, as well as to the quality of the washcoat in terms of homogeneity and reproducibility. It was found than an adequate solids content in the slurry is necessary for the achievement of satisfactory loading per impregnation. When, though, the particle size of the powder employed is of colloidal dimensions, high solids content leads to extremely high viscosity values. Adjustment of the slurry viscosity is therefore necessary and this was achieved with the use of either HCl or ammonium poly-methacrylate, an organic polyelectrolyte. Optimum loading conditions were achieved when the slurry viscosity lied between 50–150 mPa·s. For a specific solids content, the organic polyelectrolyte led to lower viscosity slurries and resulted in better reproducibility of the loading percentage. With the use of ammonium poly-methacrylate, slurries of fine particles, up to 40 wt% solids content could be handled, resulting in reproducible loading percentages of the order of 15 wt%
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. V. Blachou, D. Goula and C. Philippopoulos, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31 (1992) 364.10.1021/ie00001a049 ↗
2. T. Shimrock, R. D. Taylor and J. Collins, Eur. Patent 0157651 (1985).
3. Z. R. Ismagilov, G. V. Chernych and R. A. Skrabina, in “Catalysis and Automotive Pollution Control III-Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis Vol 96,” edited by A. Frennet and J. M. Bastin (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1995) p. 387.
4. A. F. M. Leenaars and A. J. Burgraaf, J. Coll. and Int. Sci. 105(1) (1985) 27.10.1016/0021-9797(85)90343-1 ↗
5. L. L. Murrell and S. J. Tauster, in “Catalysis and Automotive Pollution Control II,” edited by A. Crucq (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1991) p. 547.
6. G. K. Narula, W. L. H. Watkins and M. Shelef, US Patent no. 5210062 (1993).
7. E. Deliso, W. Van rijswijk and W. R. Cannon, Coll. and Surf. 53 (1991) 383.10.1016/0166-6622(91)80149-I ↗
8. J. Cesarano, I. A. Aksay and A. Bleier, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 71(4) (1988) 250.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05855.x ↗
9. J. Cesarano and I. A. Aksay, ibid. 71(12) (1988) 1062.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05792.x ↗
10. S. Baklouti, C. Pagnoux, T. Chartier and J. F. Baumard, J. Eur. Cer. Soc. 17 (1997) 1387.10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00010-1 ↗
11. A. B. Corradi, T. Manfredini, G. Pellacani and P. Pozzi, J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 77(2) (1994) 509.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07022.x ↗
12. G. Tari, J. M. F. Ferreira, A. T. Fonseca and O. Lyckfeldt, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18 (1988) 249.10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00113-1 ↗
13. I. I. M. Tijburg, J. W. Geus and H. W. Zandbergen, J. Mater. Sci. 26 (1991) 6479.10.1007/BF02387833 ↗
14. E. Deliso, W. R. Cannon and A. S. Rao, in “Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 24: Science and Technology of Zirconia III” (The American Ceramic Society, 1988) p. 335.
15. Z. Zhang, L. Hu and M. Fang, Amer. Cer. Soc. Bull. 75(12) (1996) 71.
16. P. A. Smith and R. A. Haber, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 10(1-2) (1989) 1.