journal article·2007-02

The impact properties and damage tolerance and of bi-directionally reinforced fiber metal laminates

Guocai Wu, Jenn-Ming Yang, H. Thomas Hahn

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 42· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Fiber metal laminates are an advanced hybrid materials system being evaluated as a damage tolerance and light weight solution for future aircraft primary structures. This paper investigates the impact properties and damage tolerance of glass fiber reinforced aluminum laminates with cross-ply glass prepreg layers. A systematic low velocity impact testing program based on instrumented drop weight was conducted, and the characteristic impact energies, the damage area, and the permanent deflection of laminates are used to evaluate the impact performance and damage resistance. The post-impact residual tensile strength under various damage states ranging from the plastic dent, barely visible impact damage (BVID), clearly visible impact damage (CVID) up to the complete perforation was also measured and compared. Additionally, the post-impact fatigue behavior with different damage states was also explored. The results showed that both GLARE 4 and GLARE 5 laminates have better impact properties than those of 2024-T3 monolithic aluminum alloy. GLARE laminates had a longer service life than aluminum under fatigue loading after impact, and they did not show a sudden and catastrophic failure after the fatigue crack was initiated. The damage initiation, damage progression and failure modes under impact and fatigue loading were characterized and identified with microscopy, X-ray radiography, and by deply technique.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Vogeslang LB, Vlot A (2000) J Mater Process Technol 103:110.1016/S0924-0136(00)00411-8 ↗
2. Vermeeren CAJR (2003) Appl Comp Mater 10:18910.1023/A:1025533701806 ↗
3. Vlot A, Vogelesang LB, de Vries TJ (1999) Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 71:55810.1108/00022669910303711 ↗
4. Afaghi-khatibi A, Ye L, Mai YW (2000) In: Comprehensive composite materials, vol 2, pp 249–29010.1016/B0-08-042993-9/00066-8 ↗
5. Wu G, Yang J-M (2005) JOM 57(1):7210.1007/s11837-005-0067-4 ↗
6. Vlot A, Kroon E, La Rocca G (1998) Key Eng Mater 141–143:235
7. Vlot A (1996) Int J Impact Eng 18:29110.1016/0734-743X(96)89050-6 ↗
8. Compston P, Cantwell WJ, Jones C, Jones N (2001) J Mater Sci Lett 20:59710.1023/A:1010904930497 ↗
9. Laliberte JF, Poon C, Straznicky PV, Fahr A (2002) Int J Fatigue 24:24910.1016/S0142-1123(01)00079-2 ↗
10. Sun CT, Dicken A, Wu HF (1993) Comp Sci Technol 49:13910.1016/0266-3538(93)90053-J ↗
11. Lawcock GD, Ye L, Mai YW, Sun CT (1997) Comp Sci Technol 57:162110.1016/S0266-3538(97)00094-8 ↗
12. Hwang B (1994) Damage initiation during low-velocity impact on composite laminates. PhD Dissertation, University of Dayton
13. Carlile DR, Leach DC (1983) In: Proceedings of 15th National SAMPE Technical Conf., Oct. 4–6, 1983, pp 82–93
14. Sykes GF, Stoakley DM (1980) In: Proceedings of the 12th National SAMPE Technical Conf., Oct. 7–9, 1980, pp 482–493
15. Choi HY, Wu H-YT, Chang FK (1991) J Comp Mater 25:99210.1177/002199839102500803 ↗
16. Liu D, Malvern LE (1987) J Comp Mater 21:59410.1177/002199838702100701 ↗
17. Joshi SP, Sun CT (1985) J Comp Mater 19:5110.1177/002199838501900104 ↗