journal article·2008-07

Investigation of the drawing mechanism of UHMWPE fibers

Jen-Taut Yeh, Shui-Chuan Lin, Cheng-Wei Tu, Kuo-Huang Hsie, Feng-Chih Chang

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The influence of draw ratios (DR) of gel-spun ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers on resultant morphologies, tensile, degrees of orientation, and crystal phase transition properties were investigated using wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The anisotropic crystalline structure with full concentric circular rings originally shown on the WAXD patterns of the as-prepared and drawn UHMWPE fibers gradually transform into oriented fibers with azimuthal spots on the equator as their DR values increase from 1 to 20, in which their orthorhombic crystals, percentage crystallinity, crystalline orientation, and the birefringence values increase significantly. As evidenced by SEM and WAXD analysis, the chain-folded molecules originally present in kebab crystals of the as-prepared UHMWPE fiber specimens gradually transformed into shish-like crystals with relatively high orientation as their DR values increase from 1 to 20. In contrast, the crystallinity and crystal orientation values of the drawn UHMWPE specimens increase only slightly, as their DR values increase from 20 to 40, wherein both crystallinity values of orthorhombic and monoclinic crystals increase slightly. In fact, barely any oriented kebab but only shish crystals were observed on the surfaces of drawn UHMWPE fiber specimens with DR values higher than 20. The birefringence values increase only slightly with further increasing DR values, while crystallinity and crystal orientation values of the drawn UHMWPE fiber specimens remained relatively unchanged as their DR values increase from 40 to 150. In the meantime, the monoclinic crystals gradually grow at the expense of the orthorhombic form crystals as the DR values of drawn UHMWPE fiber specimens increase from 40 to 150. Possible reasons accounting for these interesting properties found for the drawn UHMWPE fibers with varying draw ratios are proposed in this study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith P, Lemstra PJ (1979) Macromol Chem 180:2983. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.1979.02180122010.1002/macp.1979.021801220 ↗
2. Barham PJ, Leller A (1985) J Mater Sci 20:2281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055605910.1007/BF00556059 ↗
3. Ward IM (1995) Macromol Symp 100:110.1002/masy.19951000103 ↗
4. Poter RS (1980) Chem Rev 80:351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60326a00510.1021/cr60326a005 ↗
5. Rudin A, Tchir WJ, Gagnon R, Schreiber HP, Collacoot R (1989) Ind Eng Chem Res 28:174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00086a00810.1021/ie00086a008 ↗
6. Mooen JA, Kip BJ (1992) J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 30:361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1992.09030040610.1002/polb.1992.090300406 ↗
7. Riekel C, Cedola A, Heidelbach F, Wagner K (1997) Macromolecules 30:1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma960799s10.1021/ma960799s ↗
8. Yang L, Somani RH, Sics I, Hsiao BS, Kolb R, Fruitwala H, Ong C (2004) Macromolecules 37:4845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049925f10.1021/ma049925f ↗
9. Russel KE, Heyding RD (1997) Polymer 38:1409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00643-X10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00643-X ↗
10. Nakae M, Uehara H, Kanamoto T, Zachariades AE, Porter RS (2000) Macromolecules 33:2632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma991330a10.1021/ma991330a ↗
11. Hu XP, Hsieh YL (1998) Polym J 30:771. doi: https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.30.77110.1295/polymj.30.771 ↗
12. Hsieh YL, Ju J (1994) J Appl Polym Sci 53:347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1994.07053031210.1002/app.1994.070530312 ↗
13. Ratner S, Weinberg A, Maron G (2003) Polym Compos 24:422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1004010.1002/pc.10040 ↗
14. Ratner S, Weinberg A, Wachtel E, Moret PM, Marom G (2004) Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1150. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20040010210.1002/marc.200400102 ↗
15. Luo C, Guardala NA, Price JL, Chodak I, Zimerman O, Weiss RG (2002) Macromolecules 35:4690. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma020235q10.1021/ma020235q ↗
16. Hu WG, Schmidit RK (2000) Polymer 41:2979. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00429-210.1016/S0032-3861(99)00429-2 ↗
17. Rotzinger BP, Chanzy HD, Smith P (1989) Polymer 30:1814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(89)90350-910.1016/0032-3861(89)90350-9 ↗
18. Vanderhart DL, Khoury F (1984) Polymer 25:1589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(84)90151-410.1016/0032-3861(84)90151-4 ↗
19. Uehara HM, Aoike HT, Yamanobe T, Komoto T (2001) Polymer 42:5893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00911-310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00911-3 ↗
20. Sheiko S, Frey H, Moller M (1992) Colloid Polym Sci 270:440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0066598710.1007/BF00665987 ↗
21. Kwon YK, Boller A, Pyda M, Wunderlich B (2000) Polymer 41:6237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00839-310.1016/S0032-3861(99)00839-3 ↗
22. Silverstein MS, Sadovsky J, Alon D, Wahad V (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 72:405. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990418)72:3≤405::AID-APP10≥3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990418)72:3<405::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
23. Zhang H, Shi M, Zhang J, Wang S (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:2757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1244810.1002/app.12448 ↗
24. Yeh JT, Chang SS (2000) J Mater Sci 35:3227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100485890246210.1023/A:1004858902462 ↗
25. Yeh JT, Lin YT, Jiang HB (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 91:1559. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1325910.1002/app.13259 ↗
26. Yeh JT, Chang SS (2001) J Appl Polym Sci 79:1890. doi:10.1002/1097-4628(20010307)79:10≤1890::AID-APP180≥3.0.CO;2-T
27. Yeh JT, Lin YT, Chen KN (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 89:3728. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1239010.1002/app.12390 ↗
28. Chodak I (1998) Prog Polym Sci 23:1409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00006-910.1016/S0079-6700(98)00006-9 ↗
29. Alon Y, Marom G (2004) Macromol Rapid Commun 25:1387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20040018510.1002/marc.200400185 ↗
30. Yeh JT, Chang SS, Yen MS (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:149. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981003)70:1≤149::AID-APP15≥3.0.CO;2-210.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981003)70:1<149::AID-APP15>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
31. Yeh JT, Chang SS (2002) Polym Eng Sci 42:1558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1105110.1002/pen.11051 ↗
32. Jiang T, Shyu WD, Lin YT, Chen KN, Yeh JT (2003) Polym Eng Sci 43:1765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1014910.1002/pen.10149 ↗
33. Yeh JT, Lin YT, Chen KN (2003) J Polym Res 10:55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102396121605810.1023/A:1023961216058 ↗
34. Kanamoto T, Tsurta A, Tanana K, Takeda M, Porter RS (1988) Macromolecules 21:470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00180a03210.1021/ma00180a032 ↗
35. Smook J, Pennings AJ (1982) J Appl Polym Sci 27:2209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1982.07027063110.1002/app.1982.070270631 ↗
36. Hermans PH (1949) J Polym Sci 4:749. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1949.12004060910.1002/pol.1949.120040609 ↗
37. Stein RS (1958) J Polym Sci 31:327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1958.120311230910.1002/pol.1958.1203112309 ↗
38. Lacroix FV, Schulte K (1999) Polymer 40:843. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00309-710.1016/S0032-3861(98)00309-7 ↗