Weibull analysis of the tensile behavior of fibers with geometrical irregularities
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper further develops the conventional Weibull/weakest-link model by incorporating the within-fiber diameter variation. This is necessary for fibers with considerable geometrical irregularities, such as the wool and other animal fibers. The strength of wool fibers has been verified to follow this modified Weibull/weakest-link distribution. In addition, the modified Weibull model can predict the gauge length effect more accurately than the conventional model.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. A. A. GRIFFITH, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A221 (1920) 163.
2. M. W. ANDREWS, Text. Res. J. 34 (1964) 831.10.1177/004051756403401003 ↗
3. P. MASON, Text. Res. J. 34 (1964) 747.10.1177/004051756403400902 ↗
4. K. R. MAKINSON, J. Text. Inst. 61 (1970) 151.10.1080/00405007008660027 ↗
5. D. F. G. ORWIN, J. L. WOODS and K. H. ELLIOTT, in Proc. 6th Int. Wool Text. Res. Conf. 2 (Pretoria, 1980) 193.
6. X. WANG, Text. Res. J. 70(3) (2000) 191.10.1177/004051750007000302 ↗
7. Y. ZHANG and X. WANG, Wool Technology & Sheep Breeding, accepted for publication.
8. F. T. PEIRCE, J. Text. Inst. 17 (1926) T355.10.1080/19447027.1926.10599953 ↗
9. W. WEIBULL, J. Appl. Mech. 27 (1951) 293.10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
10. B. D. COLEMAN, J. Mech. and Phy. of Solids 7 (1958) 60.10.1016/0022-5096(58)90039-5 ↗
11. M. G. BADER and A. M. PRIEST, in Proc. of ICCM-IV (Tokyo, 1982) p. 1129.
12. M. R. GURVICH, A. T. DIBENEDETTO and A. PEGORETTI, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997a) 3711.10.1023/A:1018603118573 ↗
13. S. N. PATANKAR, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10 (1991) 1176.10.1007/BF00727897 ↗
14. H. F. WU and A. N. NETRAVALI, ibid. 27 (1992) 3318.
15. G. AMANIAMPONG and C. J. BURGOYNE, J. Mater. Sci. 29 (1994) 5141.10.1007/BF01151109 ↗
16. N. PAN, H. C. CHEN, J. THOMPSON, M. K. INGLESBY, S. KHATUA, X. S. ZHANG, S. H. ZERONIAN, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 2677.10.1023/A:1018679207303 ↗
17. A. G. KULKARNI, K. G. SATYANARAYANA and P. K. ROHATGI, Fiber Sci. and Tech. 19 (1983) 59.10.1016/0015-0568(83)90032-5 ↗
18. V. LAVASTE, J. BESSON and A. R. BUNSELL, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 2042.10.1007/BF00353031 ↗
19. H. D. WAGNER, in “Application of Fracture Mechanics, to Composite Materials,” edited by K. Friedrich, Chapter 2 (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1989) p. 39.
20. P. SCHWARTZ, A. NETRAVALI and S. SEMBACH, Text. Res. J. 56 (1986) 502.10.1177/004051758605600807 ↗
21. D. M. WILSON, J. Mater. Sci. 32 (1997) 2535–2542.10.1023/A:1018538030985 ↗
22. E. BOURGAIN and J. J. MASSON, ibid. 27 (1992) 1811.10.1007/BF01107208 ↗
23. M. R. GURVICH, A. T. DIBENEDETTO and S. V. RANADE, ibid. 32 (1997b) 2559.10.1023/A:1018594215963 ↗
24. W. F. KNOFF, J. Mater. Sci. 28 (1993) 931.10.1007/BF00400876 ↗
25. A. S. WATSON and R. L. SMITH, J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) 3260.10.1007/BF00545193 ↗
26. X. WANG, Y. ZHANG, R. POSTLE and N. PAN, in Proc. 2nd China Int. Wool Text. Conf. 1 (Xian, P.R, China, 1998) p. 277.
27. J. GUTANS and V. TAMUZS, Mech. Compos. Mater. 20 (1984) 1107.
28. E. C. BANKY and S. B. SLEN, Text. Res. J. 25 (1955) 358.10.1177/004051755502500409 ↗