Dielectric characteristics of sisal–oil palm hybrid biofibre reinforced natural rubber biocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural rubber was reinforced with sisal and oil palm fibers. Biocomposites were prepared by varying the weight fraction of the fibers. The dielectric properties such as dielectric constant, volume resisitivity and dielectric loss factor of the biocomposites were evaluated as a function of fiber loading, frequency and chemical modification of fibers. The dielectric constant values were found to be higher for fiber reinforced system than the gum due to polarization exerted by the incorporation of lignocellulosic fibers. Chemical modification of fibers resulted in decrease of dielectric constant values and volume resisitivity values. The volume resisitivity of the composites was found to decrease with fiber loading due to increase of hydrophilicity imparted by the lignocellulosic fibers. The dissipation factor was found to increase with fiber content.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Jacob M, Joseph S, Pothen LA, Thomas S (2005) Compos Interfaces 12(1):9510.1163/1568554053542115 ↗
2. Hong CK, Wool RP (2004) J Nat Fibres 1(2):8310.1300/J395v01n02_06 ↗
3. Hong CK, Wool RP (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 95(6):152410.1002/app.21044 ↗
4. Xua J, Donohoeb JP, Pittman CU Jr. (2004) Compos Part A 35:69310.1016/j.compositesa.2004.02.016 ↗
5. Cabral H, Cisneros M, Kenny JM, Vazquez A, Bernal CR (2005) J Compos Mater 39(1):5110.1177/0021998305046434 ↗
6. Paul A, Thomas S (1997) J Appl Polym Sci 63:24710.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970110)63:2<247::AID-APP12>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
7. Paul A, Joseph K, Thomas S (1997) Compos Sci Technol 51:6710.1016/S0266-3538(96)00109-1 ↗
8. Chand N, Jain D (2005) Compos Part A 36:594–60210.1016/j.compositesa.2004.08.002 ↗
9. Pramanik PK, Khastgir D, Saha TN (1991) Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl 15:3
10. Choi MH, Jeon BH, Chung IJ (2000) Polymer 41:324310.1016/S0032-3861(99)00532-7 ↗
11. Dutta AK, Samantary BK, Bhattachatterjee SF (1984) J Mater Sci Lett 3:66710.1007/BF00719918 ↗
12. Mohammed EM, Malini KA, Kurian P, Anantharaman MR (2002) Mater Res Bull 37(4):75310.1016/S0025-5408(02)00690-6 ↗
13. Tchmutina I, Ryvkinaa N, Saha N, Saha P (2004) Polym Degrad Stab 86:41110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.05.012 ↗
14. Lin Y-S, Chiu S-S (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93(5):204510.1002/app.20670 ↗
15. Agrawal S, Mandot S, Bandyopadhyay S, Mukhopadhyay R, Dasgupta M De PP, Deuri AS (2004) Prog Rubber Plastics Recycl Technol 20(4):26710.1177/147776060402000402 ↗
16. Nashar DEE, Abd-El-Messieh SL, Basta AH (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 91:341010.1002/app.13726 ↗
17. Joseph S, Jacob M, Thomas S (2005) Biopolym Biocomp 435–472
18. Jacob M, Varughese KT, Thomas S (2004) J Appl Polym Sci 93(5):230510.1002/app.20696 ↗
19. Balta Calleja FJ, Ezquetva TA, Rueda DR (1984) J Mat Res 3:165
20. Pooley MH, Boonstra BBT (1957) Rubber Chem Technol 30:17010.5254/1.3542660 ↗
21. Van Beek LKH (1962) J Appl Polym Sci 6(24):65110.1002/app.1962.070062408 ↗
22. Jacob M, Thomas S, Varughese KT (2004) Compos Sci Tech 64:95510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-6 ↗
23. Li Y, Mai Y-W, Ye L (2005) Compos Interfaces 12(1–2):14110.1163/1568554053542151 ↗
24. Folkes MJ, Hardwick ST (1990) J Mater Sci 52:259810.1007/BF00638065 ↗