journal article·2002-05

Influence of aspect ratio and skin effect on EMI shielding of coating materials fabricated with carbon nanofiber/PVDF

B. O. Lee, W. J. Woo, H. S. Park, H. S. Hahm, J. P. Wu, M. S. Kim

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 37· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The effectiveness of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding was measured for poly vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) coating materials containing carbon nanofibers. Carbon nanofibers produced from the C2H4/NC73 system exhibited higher shielding effectiveness (SE) by relatively large specific surface area and high aspect ratio than those from others. When the thickness of carbon nanofibers filled PVDF coating materials varied from 25 to 50 μm, the electrical conductivity of coating materials increased sharply from 1.34 to 1.91 S/cm. However, the electrical conductivity approached a certain value with further raise of the thickness. This phenomenon denotes that a critical thickness of coating materials exists around 50 μm. The electrical conductivity and SE of coating materials decreased dramatically as the carbon nanofiber fillers were milled. It could be concluded that the decrease of the shielding effectiveness of carbon nanofiber filled composite was due to the decrease of the filler's aspect ratio by ball milling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. N. F. COLANERI and L. W. SHACKLETTE, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 41 (1992) 291.10.1109/19.137363 ↗
2. J. JOO and A. J. EPSTEIN, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) 2278.10.1063/1.112717 ↗
3. M. S. P. SHAFFER and A. H. WINDLE, Adv. Mat. 11 (1999) 937.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199908)11:11<937::AID-ADMA937>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
4. P. CHANDRASEKHAR and K. NAISHADHAM, Synth. Met. 105 (1999) 115.10.1016/S0379-6779(99)00085-5 ↗
5. T. MAKELA, J. STEN, A. HUJANEN and H. ISOTALO, ibid. 101 (1999) 707.10.1016/S0379-6779(98)01095-9 ↗
6. S. KOUL, R. CHANDRA and S. K. DHAWAN, Polymer 41 (2000) 9305.10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00340-2 ↗
7. S. Y. LU, J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 2647.10.1063/1.368377 ↗
8. H. J. KEH and W. J. LI, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (1997) 1323.10.1149/1.1837592 ↗
9. N. HARFIELD, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32 (1999) 1104.10.1088/0022-3727/32/10/305 ↗
10. A. CELZARD, J. F. MARECHE and F. PAYOT, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33 (2000) 1556.10.1088/0022-3727/33/12/318 ↗
11. D. D. L. CHUNG, Carbon 39 (2001) 279.10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00184-6 ↗
12. C. A. GRIMES, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67 (1996) 4311.10.1063/1.1147531 ↗
13. S. COURRIC and V. H. TRAN, Polymer 39 (1998) 2399.10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00576-4 ↗
14. O. ACHER, A. L. ADENOT, F. LUBRANO and F. DUVERGER, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 4639.10.1063/1.370433 ↗
15. J. H. CLAASSEN, M. L. WILSON, J. M. BYERS and S. ADRIAN, ibid. 82 (1997) 3028.10.1063/1.366287 ↗
16. T. H. BOYER, Am. J. Phys. 67 (1999) 954.10.1119/1.19171 ↗
17. N. M. RODRIGUEZ, J. Mater. Res. 8 (1993) 3233.10.1557/JMR.1993.3233 ↗
18. X. CHEN, T. SAITO, M. KUSUNOKI and S. MOTOJIMA, ibid. 14 (1999) 4329.10.1557/JMR.1999.0586 ↗