Moisture-dependent elastic and strength anisotropy of European beech wood in tension
Source abstract
Abstract
While the general mechanical behaviour of wood is known, its moisture-dependent elastic and strength anisotropy remains little studied. Given the anisotropic and hygroscopic nature of wood, a characterisation of wood mechanical behaviour will require knowledge of its moisture- dependent properties in relation to the three principal axes of anisotropy. The present study examines the influence of the moisture content (MC) on the elastic and strength anisotropy of beech wood (Fagus sylvatica L.). Selected elastic and strength parameters, including the anisotropic Young's moduli, Poisson's ratios, yield and ultimate stress values and the fracture toughness in the TR, TL, RT and RL directions, are determined in uniaxial tension and compact tension tests at different moisture conditions. A distinct moisture dependency is shown for the elastic and strength behaviour of beech wood. With the exception of some Poisson's ratios, all investigated elastic and strength parameters are shown to decrease with increasing MC. The two- and three-dimensional representation of the compliance matrix, and the two-dimensional visualisation of a yield surface, provides a valuable overview on the moisture-dependent elastic and strength anisotropy of beech wood. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tree Root and Stability Studies · Wood Treatment and Properties · Forest ecology and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Tiemann HD (1906) Effect of moisture upon the strength and stiffness of wood. U.S Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service Bul. 70
2. Neuhaus FH (1983) Holz Roh Werkst 41(1):2110.1007/BF02608449 ↗
3. McBurney RS, Drow JT (1962) The elastic properties of wood: Young’s moduli and Poisson’s ratios of Douglas-fir and their relations to moisture content. Report No. 1528-D. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin
4. Kretschmann DE, Green DW (1996) Wood Fiber Sci 28(3):320
5. Hering S, Keunecke D, Niemz P (2011) Wood Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00226-011-0449-4
6. Gerhards CC (1982) Wood Fiber Sci 14(1):4
7. Ross RJ (ed) (2010) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison10.2737/FPL-GTR-190 ↗
8. Kufner M (1978) Holz Roh Werkst 36(11):43510.1007/BF02607685 ↗
9. Goulet M (1960) Holz Roh Werkst 18(9):32510.1007/BF02627591 ↗
10. Östman BAL (1985) Wood Sci Technol 19(2):10310.1007/BF00353071 ↗
11. Kollmann F (1951) Technologie des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe. Springer, Berlin
12. Bodig J, Jayne BA (1993) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar
13. Niemz P (1993) Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe. DRW-Verlag Weinbrenner GmbH & Co, Leinfelden-Echterdingen
14. Schachner H, Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2000) J Mater Sci Lett 19(20):178310.1023/A:1006703718032 ↗
15. Frühmann K, Reiterer A, Tschegg EK, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2002) Philos Mag A 82(17):328910.1080/01418610208240441 ↗
16. Smith I, Vasic S (2003) Mech Mater 35(8):803–81510.1016/S0167-6636(02)00208-9 ↗
17. Schniewind AP, Pozniak RA (1971) Eng Fract Mech 2(3):223–23310.1016/0013-7944(71)90026-9 ↗
18. Prokopski G (1996) Int J Fract 79(4):R7310.1007/BF00018604 ↗
19. Reiterer A, Tschegg S (2002) J Mater Sci 37(20):4487. doi: 10.1023/A:102061023186210.1023/A:1020610231862 ↗
20. Vasic S, Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2007) Holzforschung 61:36710.1515/HF.2007.056 ↗
21. Scheffler M, Niemz P, Diener M, Lustig V, Hardtke HJ (2004) Eur J Wood Prod 62(2):9310.1007/s00107-003-0443-0 ↗
22. Ewing PD, Williams JG (1979) J Mater Sci 14(12):2959. doi: 10.1007/BF0061148010.1007/BF00611480 ↗
23. Neumann AJ (1998) Ermittlung und Bewertung der elastischen Materialkennwerte von Vollholz in Abhängigkeit der Feuchte und der Anisotropie. Master Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden
24. Wommelsdorf O (1966) Dehnungs- und Querdehnungszahlen von Hölzern. Dissertation, Technische Hochschule Hannover
25. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (DIN) (1979) DIN 52188. Prüfung von Holz; Bestimmung der Zugfestigkeit parallel zur Faser
26. Keunecke D, Hering S, Niemz P (2008) Wood Sci Technol 42(8):63310.1007/s00226-008-0192-7 ↗
27. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1997) ASTM E399-90. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials
28. Smith I, Landis E, Gong M (2003) Fracture and fatigue in wood. Wiley, Chichester
29. Choi D, Thorpe JL, Hann RB (1991) Wood Sci Technol 25(4):25110.1007/BF00225465 ↗
30. Stamer J, Sieglerschmidt H (1933) Z Ver Dtsch Ing 77(19):503
31. Hearmon RFS, Barkas WW (1941) Proc Phys Soc 53(6):67410.1088/0959-5309/53/6/306 ↗
32. Pozgaj A, Chovanec D, Kuriatko S, Babiak M (1993) Štruktúra a vlastnosti dreva. Priroda, Bratislava
33. Ozyhar T, Hering S, Sanabria SJ, Niemz P (2012) Determining moisture-dependent elastic characteristics of beech wood by means of ultrasonic waves. Wood Sci Technol (accepted for publication)10.1007/s00226-012-0499-2 ↗
34. Jeong GY, Hindman DP, Zink-Sharp A (2010) J Mater Sci 45(21):5820. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4658-210.1007/s10853-010-4658-2 ↗
35. Conners TE, Medvecz CJ (1992) Wood Fiber Sci 24(4):413
36. Grimsel M (1999) Mechanisches Verhalten von Holz. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden
37. Hering S, Saft S, Resch E, Niemz P, Kaliske M (2012) Holzforschung 66(3):37310.1515/hf.2011.162 ↗
38. Saft S, Kaliske M (2011) Comput Struct 89(23–24):246010.1016/j.compstruc.2011.06.004 ↗
39. Resch E, Kaliske M (2010) Comput Struct 88(3–4):16510.1016/j.compstruc.2009.09.002 ↗
40. Stanzl-Tschegg SE (2006) Int J fracture 139(3–4):459
41. Burgert I, Bernasconi A, Eckstein D (1999) Eur J Wood Prod 57(5):39710.1007/s001070050367 ↗
42. Burgert I, Eckstein D (2001) Trees-Struct Funct 15(3):16810.1007/s004680000086 ↗