Influence of thermal and mechanical surface modifications induced by laser shock processing on the initiation of corrosion pits in 316L stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Pure mechanical and thermo-mechanical laser shock processing treatments have been carried out on an AISI 316L stainless steel. Surface properties, mostly mechanical and metallurgical modifications, were analysed at different scales: a local scale using the nano-indentation technique and AFM analysis, and a more macroscopic scale, using microhardness, optical microscopy and residual stress determinations. After a pure mechanical laser-peening treatment, a significant improvement in the pitting corrosion resistance (+0.1 V) was observed in 0.05 M NaCl. This improvement was attributed to the combined effects of compressive residual stresses and work-hardening, and, in turn, to a mechano-electrochemical phenomenon by which a modification of cathodic reactions occurs during electrochemical tests. For the surface treated by thermo-mechanical laser peening (combination of a surface ablation and shock waves), a tendency for decreasing resistance against pitting corrosion was shown, and attributed to the processing-specific surface texture (ablation craters), which made the material susceptible for the creation of occluded cells.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Pan Q, Hang W, Song R, Zhou Y, Zhang G (1998) Surface Coating Technol 102:24510.1016/S0257-8972(98)00358-2 ↗
2. Kwok C, Man H, Cheng F (1998) Surface Coating Technol 99:29510.1016/S0257-8972(97)00624-5 ↗
3. Clauer AH (1981) In: Shock waves and high strain rate phenomena in metals. Plenum Press, New York, p 67510.1007/978-1-4613-3219-0_38 ↗
4. Obata M, Kubo T, Sano Y (2000) Zairyo 49(2):193
5. Peyre P, Scherpereel X, Berthe L, Carboni C, Fabbro R, Beranger G, Lemaitre C (2000) Mater Sci Eng 280(2):29410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00698-X ↗
6. Krauβ M, Herzog R, Scholtes B (2001) Z Metallkd 92(8):910
7. Braham C, Perrais J, Ledion J (1994) 2ème Colloque Européen “Corrosion Dans Les Usines Chimiques Et Parachimiques’’. 206ème Manifestation Fec, Grenoble (Fr)
8. Ben Rhouma A, Braham C, Fitzpatrick ME (2001) J Mater Eng Perf 10:50710.1361/105994901770344638 ↗
9. Ke R, Alkire R (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142(12):405610.1149/1.2048462 ↗
10. Carboni C (2002) Doctoral Thesis, University of Technology of Compiègne, Fr
11. Carboni C, Peyre P, Fregonese M, Mazille H (2001) In: Jeandin M, Sudarshan T (eds) Proceedings of surface modifications technologies XIV (Smt14), Paris, Sept. 2000. ASM, p 381
12. Fabbro R, Fournier J, Ballard P, Devaux D, Virmont J (1990) J Appl Phys 68:77510.1063/1.346783 ↗
13. Schmidt-Uhlig T (2000) Epj Appl Phys 9(3):23510.1051/epjap:2000109 ↗
14. Seo M, Chiba M (2001) Electrochim Acta 47:31910.1016/S0013-4686(01)00577-1 ↗
15. Lu J (2005) In: Lu J (ed) Handbook on residual stress measurements, 2nd edn. SEM
16. Gutman EM (1994) Mechanochemistry of solid surfaces, Ed. World Scientific Publishers, Singapore10.1142/2373 ↗
17. Vignal V, Valot C, Oltra R, Verneau M, Coudreuse L (2002) Corros Sci 44(7):147710.1016/S0010-938X(01)00162-7 ↗
18. Kamachi Mudali U, Katada Y (2001) Electrochim Acta 46:373510.1016/S0013-4686(01)00655-7 ↗