journal article·2025-10-28

Effects of Mo Doping on the Superconducting Properties of NbSe 2

Matthew N. Disiena, Rajveer Jha, Luke Sloan, Sanjay K. Banerjee

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 7· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) exhibit remarkable tunability in their structural and electronic properties, making them an excellent platform for exploring quantum phases in two-dimensional materials. Among these, 2 H -NbSe 2 is a classic TMD superconductor that shows conventional superconductivity with a relatively high superconducting transition temperature ( T c ) of 7.2 K. In this study, we investigate the effect of Mo doping at the Nb site in NbSe 2, creating the alloy system Nb 1– x Mo x Se 2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.15). Notably, a slight increase in T c is observed at a low doping level of x = 0.01, followed by a gradual decrease as Mo content increases, indicating a nonmonotonic relationship between superconductivity and Mo doping. We also found that the critical current density J c increased by approximately 26% for x = 0.01 compared to undoped NbSe 2 . The upper critical field ( B c2 ) is estimated to be approximately 14.71 T for the x = 0.01 sample, which is among the highest reported values for polycrystalline NbSe 2, indicating a significant enhancement in the robustness of the superconducting state of NbSe 2 at low Mo doping levels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron-based superconductors research · 2D Materials and Applications · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Microelectronics Research Center

University of Texas at Austin

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.28.29910.1103/PhysRevLett.28.299 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.14030310.1103/PhysRevB.92.140303 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0026810.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00268 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphys352710.1038/nphys3527 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.02310.1016/j.physc.2015.02.023 ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat231810.1038/nmat2318 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41586-022-05521-310.1038/s41586-022-05521-3 ↗
8. 10.1038/nnano.2015.14310.1038/nnano.2015.143 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.24110810.1103/PhysRevB.80.241108 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41567-022-01778-710.1038/s41567-022-01778-7 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41586-023-05967-z10.1038/s41586-023-05967-z ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-021-23976-210.1038/s41467-021-23976-2 ↗
13. 10.1143/JPSJ.68.107810.1143/JPSJ.68.1078 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.05700310.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057003 ↗
15. 10.1002/qute.20220008010.1002/qute.202200080 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-019-03757-510.1007/s10853-019-03757-5 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-018-36672-x10.1038/s41598-018-36672-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.01210.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.012 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b0057410.1021/acsami.6b00574 ↗
20. 10.1088/1361-6668/30/2/02501310.1088/1361-6668/30/2/025013 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.17452410.1103/PhysRevB.87.174524 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20220049210.1002/adma.202200492 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.physc.2019.02.01110.1016/j.physc.2019.02.011 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ssc.2019.04.01610.1016/j.ssc.2019.04.016 ↗
25. 10.1021/ic00205a01310.1021/ic00205a013 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0065510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00655 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.physb.2009.10.02810.1016/j.physb.2009.10.028 ↗
28. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0242110.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02421 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.120243410910.1073/pnas.1202434109 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.0c0880410.1021/acsami.0c08804 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.8.25010.1103/PhysRevLett.8.250 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRev.147.29510.1103/PhysRev.147.295 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.physc.2003.10.03010.1016/j.physc.2003.10.030 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphys353810.1038/nphys3538 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.04100310.1103/PhysRevX.10.041003 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-648X/ac00da10.1088/1361-648X/ac00da ↗
38. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11075810.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110758 ↗