Direct Transfer-Bonding Approach toward High-Yield, Large-Area Micro Light-Emitting Diode Integration
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional mass-transfer techniques for micro-LED display fabrication typically involve at least three sequential transfer steps to integrate micro-LED chips into the final driving circuitry. However, as chip sizes continue to decrease, the risk of mechanical damage during each transfer step increases─making even a single transfer step potentially detrimental to device integrity. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a direct transfer-bonding approach that eliminates the need for temporary substrates and intermediate transfer stages. Our strategy simplifies processing, enhances yield, and reduces manufacturing costs. Through experimental validation and finite element analysis, we developed an optimized transfer architecture for laser lift-off conditions and bump structures. Under optimal parameters─a bump height of 6 μm and 30% laser power─the process achieved a maximum transfer yield of 94.3%, demonstrating the feasibility of high-precision and high-reliability integration. This strategy offers a scalable and cost-effective solution for the mass production of micro-LED displays.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Photonic Semiconductor Research Center
Korea Photonics Technology Institute (KOPTI)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
Department of Nanomechatronics Engineering
Pusan National University
Energy Convergence Core Facility
Chonnam National University
LG Display R&D Center, LG Science Park, 30 Magokjungang 10-ro, Gangseo-gu, Seoul 07796, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy · Pusan National University
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.10937410.1063/1.109374 ↗
2. 10.1143/JJAP.35.L7410.1143/JJAP.35.L74 ↗
3. 10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/05650110.1088/0034-4885/79/5/056501 ↗
4. 10.1889/1.284186410.1889/1.2841864 ↗
5. 10.1063/5.017755010.1063/5.0177550 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-024-53965-010.1038/s41467-024-53965-0 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41377-020-0268-110.1038/s41377-020-0268-1 ↗
8. 10.3390/app809155710.3390/app8091557 ↗
9. 10.37188/lam.2023.03110.37188/lam.2023.031 ↗
10. 10.34133/research.004710.34133/research.0047 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.10026310.1016/j.pquantelec.2020.100263 ↗
12. 10.1002/lpor.20210042710.1002/lpor.202100427 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.23.00932910.1364/OE.23.009329 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.02210.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.01410.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.014 ↗
16. 10.1002/sdtp.1235210.1002/sdtp.12352 ↗
17. 10.1364/PRJ.5.000A2310.1364/PRJ.5.000A23 ↗
18. 10.1088/2631-7990/ac92ee10.1088/2631-7990/ac92ee ↗
19. 10.1002/sdtp.1287210.1002/sdtp.12872 ↗
20. 10.1080/19475411.2025.250002610.1080/19475411.2025.2500026 ↗
21. 10.1002/sdtp.1530310.1002/sdtp.15303 ↗
22. 10.48550/arXiv.2503.1110910.48550/arXiv.2503.11109 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.361567910.1063/1.3615679 ↗
24. 10.1002/jsid.96210.1002/jsid.962 ↗
25. 10.1364/OE.41987710.1364/OE.419877 ↗
26. 10.1364/OE.46242210.1364/OE.462422 ↗
27. 10.1364/oe.53011810.1364/oe.530118 ↗
28. 10.4071/imaps.154206610.4071/imaps.1542066 ↗
29. Feng, Y.; Ma, K. Chiplet Actuary: A Quantitative Cost Model and Multi-Chiplet Architecture Exploration. In DAC ’22: Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 2022; pp 121–126.10.1145/3489517.3530428.10.1145/3489517.3530428 ↗
30. Ahmad, M.; DeLaCruz, J.; Ramamurthy, A. Heterogeneous Integration of Chiplets: Cost and Yield Tradeoff Analysis. In 2022 23rd Int. Conf. Thermal, Mech. Multi-Phys. Simulation Exper. Microelectronics Microsystems (EuroSimE), IEEE, 2022; St Julian, Malta, April 25–27, pp1–9.10.1109/EuroSimE54907.2022.975891410.1109/EuroSimE54907.2022.9758914 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0087610.1021/acsphotonics.8b00876 ↗
32. 10.1364/OE.48039310.1364/OE.480393 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0192910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01929 ↗
34. 10.7567/1882-0786/ab5ad310.7567/1882-0786/ab5ad3 ↗
35. El-Ghoroury, H. S.; Brown, R. G. W.; McNeill, D. A.; DenBoer, H.; Lanzone, A. J. Quantum Photonic Imagers and Methods of Fabrication Thereof. U.S. Patent Application US 20100003777 A1, 2010https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100003777A1 (accessed June 24, 2025)
36. 10.1002/admi.20210030010.1002/admi.202100300 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.0c0083910.1021/acsami.0c00839 ↗
38. 10.1002/sdtp.1647710.1002/sdtp.16477 ↗
39. TrendForce. Meta Unveils First AR Glasses Prototype “Orion” that Employs Ledos Technology, Says Trendforce. TrendForce Press Center, September 26, 2024. https://www.trendforce.com/presscenter/news/20240926-12313.html (accessed June 24, 2025).
40. 10.1021/acsami.5c0153110.1021/acsami.5c01531 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.07810.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.078 ↗
42. Gan C. L. · 2023 · 6710.1007/978-3-031-26708-6_4 ↗
43. 10.1063/5.017735110.1063/5.0177351 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10471210.1016/j.rineng.2025.104712 ↗
45. 10.1002/admt.20220094910.1002/admt.202200949 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.359234110.1063/1.3592341 ↗
47. 10.3390/ma1808178310.3390/ma18081783 ↗