Microrheology as a tool for high-throughput screening
Source abstract
Abstract
Microrheology can be used for high-throughput screening of the rheological properties of sample libraries of complex fluids. Two passive techniques are particularly suitable: video microscopy and diffusing-wave spectroscopy. The techniques complement each other very well and can be applied to samples that offer different experimental challenges. We offer a thorough analysis of the strengths and limitations of microrheology with the emphasis on high-throughput applications. To illustrate the potential of microrheology, results are presented for two representative cases: the rheological screening of aqueous solutions of a block copolypeptide library and the rheological phase diagram of a water/surfactant/salt system.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. H. Freundlich and W. Seifriz Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 104 (1922) 233.
2. F. C. Mackintosh and C. F. Schmidt, Curr. Opin. Coll. Interf. Sci. 4 (1999) 300.10.1016/S1359-0294(99)90010-9 ↗
3. M. J. Solomon and Q. Lu, ibid. 6 (2001) 430.10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00111-X ↗
4. A. Mukhopadhyay and S. Granick, ibid. 6 (2001) 423.10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00119-4 ↗
5. F. Ziemann, J. Radler and E. Sackmann, Biophys. J. 66(6) (1994) 2210.10.1016/S0006-3495(94)81017-3 ↗
6. F. Amblard, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(21) (1996) 4470.10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4470 ↗
7. A. R. Bausch, W. Moller and E. Sackmann, Biophys. J. 76(1) (1999) 573.10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77225-5 ↗
8. A. Ashkin, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. United States of America 94(10) (1997) 4853.10.1073/pnas.94.10.4853 ↗
9. C. Mio and D. W. M. Marr, Adv. Mater. 12(12) (2000) 917.10.1002/1521-4095(200006)12:12<917::AID-ADMA917>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
10. B. Y. Du, et al., Langmuir 17(11) (2001) 3286.10.1021/la001434a ↗
11. R. E. Mahaffy, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(4) (2000) 880.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.880 ↗
12. T. G. Mason and D. A. Weitz, ibid. 74(7) (1995) 1250.10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1250 ↗
13. A. J. Levine and T. C. Lubensky, ibid. 85(8) (2000) 1774.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1774 ↗
14. B. Schnurr, et al., Macromol. 30(25) (1997) 7781.10.1021/ma970555n ↗
15. T. G. Mason, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(17) (1997) 3282.10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3282 ↗
16. T. G. Mason, H. Gang and D. A. Weitz, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. a-Optics Image Sci. Vis. 14(1) (1997) 139.10.1364/JOSAA.14.000139 ↗
17. J. Apgar, et al., Biophys. J. 79(2) (2000) 1095.10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76363-6 ↗
18. J. C. Crocker, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(4) (2000) 888.10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.888 ↗
19. M. T. Valentine, et al., Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001) 061506.10.1103/PhysRevE.64.061506 ↗
20. A. P. Nowak, et al., Nature 417(6887) (2002) 424.10.1038/417424a ↗
21. B. R. Dasgupta, et al., Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 051505.10.1103/PhysRevE.65.046405 ↗
22. T. G. Mason, Rheol. Acta 39(4) (2000) 371.10.1007/s003970000094 ↗
23. S.G. J. M. Kluijtmans, G. H. Koenderink and A. P. Philipse, Phys. Rev. E 61(1) (2000) 626.10.1103/PhysRevE.61.626 ↗
24. M. Keller, J. Schilling and E. Sackmann, Rev. Sci. Instr. 72(9) (2001) 3626.10.1063/1.1394185 ↗
25. J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 179 (1996) 298.10.1006/jcis.1996.0217 ↗
26. M. T. Valentine, et al., Biophys. J. 80(1) (2001) 495a.
27. D. A. Weitz and D. J. Pine, in “Dynamic Light Scattering,” edited by W. Brown (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993) p. 652.10.1093/oso/9780198539421.003.0016 ↗
28. G. Maret, Curr. Opin. Coll. Interf. Sci. 2(3) (1997) 251.10.1016/S1359-0294(97)80032-5 ↗
29. T. J. Deming, Nature 390(6658) (1997) 386.10.1038/37084 ↗
30. M. Tornblom, U. Henriksson and M. Ginley, J. Phys. Chem. 98(28) (1994) 7041.10.1021/j100079a025 ↗