journal article·2008-09

Stiffness and energy dissipation in polyurethane auxetic foams

Matteo Bianchi, Fabrizio L. Scarpa, Christopher W. Smith

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Auxetic open cell polyurethane (PU) foams have been manufactured and mechanically characterised under cyclic tensile loading. The classical manufacturing process for auxetic PU foams involves multiaxial compression of the conventional parent foam, and heating of the compressed specimens above the Tm of the foam polymer. Eighty cylindrical specimens were fabricated using manufacturing routes modified from those in the open literature, with different temperatures (135 °C, 150 °C), compression ratios and different cooling methods (water or room temperature exposure). Compressive tensile cyclic loading has been applied to measure tangent modulus, Poisson’s ratios and energy dissipated per unit volume. The results are used to obtain relations between manufacturing parameters, mechanical and hysteresis properties of the foams. Compression, both radial and axial, was found to be the most significant manufacturing parameter for the auxetic foams in this work.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Lakes RS (1987) Science 235:1038. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
2. Lakes RS (1987) Science 238:551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.238.4826.551-a10.1126/science.238.4826.551-a ↗
3. Evans KE, Nkansah MA, Hutchinson IJ (1991) Nature 353:124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/353124a010.1038/353124a0 ↗
4. Herakovich CT (1984) J Compos Mater 18(5):447. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983840180050410.1177/002199838401800504 ↗
5. Clarke JF, Duckett RA, Hine PJ, Hutchinson IJ, Ward IM (1994) Composites 25(9):863. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(94)90027-210.1016/0010-4361(94)90027-2 ↗
6. Evans KE, Donoghue JP, Alderson KL (2004) J Compos Mater 38(2):95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002199830403864510.1177/0021998304038645 ↗
7. Evans KE, Alderson KL (1992) J Mater Sci Lett 11(24):573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0073622110.1007/BF00736221 ↗
8. Alderson KL, Fitzgerald A, Evans KE (2000) J Mater Sci 35(16):1573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100483010341110.1023/A:1004830103411 ↗
9. Abdel-Sayed FK, Jones R, Burgens IW (1979) Composites 10:279
10. Masters IG, Evans KE (1996) Compos Struct 35:403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-210.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
11. Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G (2000) J Strain Anal 35(5):383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1243/030932400151415210.1243/0309324001514152 ↗
12. Prall D, Lakes R (1996) Int J Mech Sci 39(3):305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
13. Scarpa F, Blain S, Lew T, Perrott D, Ruzzene M, Yates JR (2007) Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 38(2):280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.007 ↗
14. Friis EA, Lakes RS, Park JB (1988) J Mater Sci 23:4406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055193910.1007/BF00551939 ↗
15. Lakes RS, Elms K (1993) J Compos Mater 27:1193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983930270120310.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
16. Chen CP, Lakes RS (1989) Cell Polym 8(5):34310.1177/026248938900800501 ↗
17. Lakes RS (1992) Cell Polym 11:466
18. Howell B, Prendergast P, Hansen L (1994) Appl Acoust 43(2):141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(94)90057-410.1016/0003-682X(94)90057-4 ↗
19. Scarpa F, Ciffo LG, Yates JR (2004) Smart Mater Struct 13(1):49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/00610.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
20. Chan N, Evans KE (1997) J Mater Sci 32(22):5945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101860692609410.1023/A:1018606926094 ↗
21. Gaspar N, Smith CW, Miller EA, Seidler GT, Evans KE (2005) Phys Status Solidi B 242(3):550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20046037510.1002/pssb.200460375 ↗
22. Scarpa F, Pastorino P, Garelli A, Patsias S, Ruzzene M (2005) Phys Status Solidi B 242(3):681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.20046038610.1002/pssb.200460386 ↗
23. Scarpa F, Yates JR, Ciffo LG (2002) Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Sci 216(12):115310.1243/095440602321029382 ↗
24. Bezazi A, Scarpa F (2007) Int J Fatigue 29(7):922. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.015 ↗
25. Lakes RS (1998) Viscoelastic solids. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
26. Smith CW, Wootton RJ, Evans KE (1999) Exp Mech 39(4):356. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0232981710.1007/BF02329817 ↗
27. Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausolito, pp 166–168
28. Smith CW, Lehman F, Wootton RJ, Evans KE (1999) Cell Polym 18(2):79