Review: sanitary pads—composition, regulation, and ongoing research to address associated challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Menstrual health management (MHM) plays a crucial role in women’s well-being and empowerment; yet, it remains a pressing challenge in many parts of the world. The transition from traditional methods of managing menstruation, such as using rags or other makeshift materials, to the use of disposable sanitary pads has significantly impacted women's lives. However, there are many people, especially in the Global South, that still battles with a lack of access to proper MHM and the application of water, sanitation and hygiene facilities (WASH). In many developing countries, women have historically relied on improvised materials like rags, leaves, or old clothing to manage their menstruation. These methods often result in poor hygiene practices, discomfort, and an increased risk of infection. The introduction and widespread availability of disposable sanitary pads have revolutionized menstrual health management in the Global North, mainly by providing a convenient and hygienic alternative. Disposable sanitary pads offer absorbency, leak protection, and odour control, enhancing women’s comfort and confidence during menstruation. However, challenges persist in ensuring the sustainable production and disposal of disposable sanitary pads. The environmental impact of disposable sanitary pads, including their non-biodegradable nature and plastic waste, raises concerns about long-term sustainability. Also, several voices have gone up against the use of phthalates and other harmful chemicals found in these products which are considered harmful to the female reproduction system. While efforts are underway to develop eco-friendly alternatives and promote proper waste management practices, MHM still has a long way to go. In this article, we discuss the history, composition, the various issues of their use, and the latest developments in the research and manufacture of disposable sanitary pads. We show with examples from the Global South, from countries like South Africa, Uganda, and India, that much is yet to be done to provide access to all due to costs, and that safety and the environment are not the highest priority when selecting a sanitary product. We conclude with suggestions for future research and development of sanitary products. Graphical Abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wound Healing and Treatments · Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Madhu C, Patel B (2024) Designing pH-responsive SAP-coated menstrual pads and comparing them to marketable products through quality analysis. Bull Natl Res Cent 48:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-024-01196-010.1186/s42269-024-01196-0 ↗
2. Kavinkumar MC, Saravanakumar A, Parthiban P, Mohanraj KS, Sangeetha S, Periyanayaki P, Harsath MJ, Ayyappan K (2023) Sanitary towels, their menace, and the ministration of herbalism: an overview of the feminine pad patron mad mady. Int J Innov Res Technol 10:1026–1040
3. Hand J, Hwang C, Vogel W, Lopez C, Hwang S (2023) An exploration of market organic sanitary products for improving menstrual health and environmental impact. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 13:63–77. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2023.02010.2166/washdev.2023.020 ↗
4. Moodley N (2023) R30-billion: sanitary products bleeding women dry even though cheaper, greener options available. Daily Maverick Business Reflection
5. Blair LAG, Bajón -Fernández Y, Villa R (2022) An exploratory study of the impact and potential of menstrual hygiene management waste in the UK. Clean Eng Technol 7:100435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.10043510.1016/j.clet.2022.100435 ↗
6. Matthews G (2025) Sanitary waste facts. In: businesswste.co.uk
7. Upson K, Shearston JA, Kioumourtzoglou M-A (2022) Menstrual products as a source of environmental chemical exposure: a review from the epidemiologic perspective. Curr Environ Health Rep 9:38–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00331-110.1007/s40572-022-00331-1 ↗
8. Kambala C, Chinangwa A, Chipeta E, Torondel B, Morse T (2020) Acceptability of menstrual products interventions for menstrual hygiene management among women and girls in Malawi. Reprod Health 17:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01045-z10.1186/s12978-020-01045-z ↗
9. Kaur N, Byard RW (2021) Menstrual health management: practices, challenges and human rights violations. Med Leg J 89:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817221105211110.1177/00258172211052111 ↗
10. Hennegan J, Winkler IT, Bobel C, Keiser D, Hampton J, Larsson G, Chandra-Mouli V, Plesons M, Mahon T (2021) Menstrual health: a definition for policy, practice, and research. Sex Reprod Health Matters 29:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.191161810.1080/26410397.2021.1911618 ↗
11. Torondel B, Sinha S, Mohanty JR, Swain T, Sahoo P, Panda B, Nayak A, Bara M, Bilung B, Cumming O, Panigrahi P, Das P (2018) Association between unhygienic menstrual management practices and prevalence of lower reproductive tract infections: a hospital-based cross-sectional study in Odisha. India BMC Infect Dis 18:473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3384-210.1186/s12879-018-3384-2 ↗
12. Banappagoudar SB, Kripa N, Kanna KR, Kurian NK, Mayank R (2021) Anti-bacterial sanitary napkin using biomaterial application. Volatiles Essent Oils 8:12254–12263
13. World Health Organization Menstrual hygiene management. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/menstrual-hygiene-management
14. Sommer M, Hirsch JS, Nathanson C, Parker RG (2015) Comfortably, safely, and without shame: defining menstrual hygiene management as a public health issue. Am J Public Health 105:1302–1311. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH10.2105/AJPH ↗
15. Nicole W (2014) A Question for women’s health: chemicals in feminine hygiene products and personal lubricants. Environ Health Perspect 122:A70–A75. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.122-A7010.1289/ehp.122-A70 ↗
16. Desmedt B, Marcelis Q, Zhilivoda D, Deconinck E (2020) Sensitizing fragrances in absorbent hygiene products. Contact Dermatitis 82:279–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.1347210.1111/cod.13472 ↗
17. Woeller KE, Hochwalt AE (2015) Safety assessment of sanitary pads with a polymeric foam absorbent core. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 73:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.07.02810.1016/j.yrtph.2015.07.028 ↗
18. Shin JH, Ahn YG (2007) Analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzo-furans in sanitary products of women. Text Res J 77:597–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750707878610.1177/0040517507078786 ↗
19. Park CJ, Barakat R, Ulanov A, Li Z, Lin PC, Chiu K, Zhou S, Perez P, Lee J, Flaws J, Ko CMJ (2019) Sanitary pads and diapers contain higher phthalate contents than those in common commercial plastic products. Reprod Toxicol 84:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.00510.1016/j.reprotox.2019.01.005 ↗
20. Zhou Y, Lin X, Xing Y, Zhang X, Lee HK, Huang Z (2023) Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in personal hygiene products: the implications for human exposure and emission to the environment. Environ Sci Technol 57:8484–8495. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c0891210.1021/acs.est.2c08912 ↗
21. Weuve J, Hauser R, Calafat AM, Missmer SA, Wise LA (2010) Association of exposure to phthalates with endometriosis and uterine leiomyomata: findings from NHANES, 1999–2004. Environ Health Perspect 118:825–832. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.090154310.1289/ehp.0901543 ↗
22. Ferguson KK, Rosen EM, Rosario Z, Feric Z, Calafat AM, McElrath TF, Vélez Vega C, Cordero JF, Alshawabkeh A, Meeker JD (2019) Environmental phthalate exposure and preterm birth in the PROTECT birth cohort. Environ Int 132:105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.10509910.1016/j.envint.2019.105099 ↗
23. Kim HY, Lee JD, Kim J-Y, Lee JY, Bae O-N, Choi Y-K, Baek E, Kang S, Min C, Seo K, Choi K, Lee B-M, Kim K-B (2019) Risk assessment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in sanitary pads. J Toxicol Environ Health A 82:678–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2019.164260710.1080/15287394.2019.1642607 ↗
24. Kara S (2021) A research study about the expectations from sanitary napkins, current problems and design of a functional sanitary napkin. J Inst Sci Technol 37:74–90
25. Bashari A, Rouhani Shirvan A, Shakeri M (2018) Cellulose-based hydrogels for personal care products. Polym Adv Technol 29:2853–286710.1002/pat.4290 ↗
26. Ding C, Yu Y, Zhou Q (2021) Bacterial vaginosis: effects on reproduction and its therapeutics. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 50:102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.10217410.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102174 ↗
27. Sauperl O, Zabret A, Fras Zemljič L (2020) Development of advanced sanitary materials with the use of probiotic paste. J Eng Fiber Fabr 15:155892502092221. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892502092221510.1177/1558925020922215 ↗
28. Eschenbach DA, Thwin SS, Patton DL, Hooton TM, Stapleton AE, Agnew K, Winter C, Meier A, Stamm WE (2000) Influence of the normal menstrual cycle on vaginal tissue, discharge, and microflora. Clin Infect Dis 30:901–907. https://doi.org/10.1086/31381810.1086/313818 ↗
29. Miko E, Barakonyi A (2023) The role of hydrogen-peroxide (H2O2) produced by vaginal microbiota in female reproductive health. Antioxidants 12:1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox1205105510.3390/antiox12051055 ↗
30. Bae J, Kwon H, Kim J (2018) Safety evaluation of absorbent hygiene pads: a review on assessment framework and test methods. Sustainability 10:4146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1011414610.3390/su10114146 ↗
31. Tang KPM, Li CH, Kan CW (2020) Instrumentation for measuring the wet frictional property of sanitary pads. Fibers Polym 21:216–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-9623-310.1007/s12221-020-9623-3 ↗
32. Dixit S, Sharma M (2023) Benign inflammatory vulval dermatoses: diagnostic approach and management strategies. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med 33:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2023.02.00410.1016/j.ogrm.2023.02.004 ↗
33. Kakonke G, Tesfaye T, Sithole B, Ntunka M (2019) Review on the manufacturing and properties of nonwoven superabsorbent core fabrics used in disposable diapers. Int J Chem Sci 17:302. https://doi.org/10.21767/0972-768X.100030210.21767/0972-768X.1000302 ↗
34. Pohlmann M (2016) Design and materials selection: analysis of similar sanitary pads for daily use. J Eng Res Appl 6:74–79
35. Liu H, Feng Y, Qian X (2019) Preparation and properties of eccentric hollow fiber nonwovens for acquisition distribution layer. J Eng Fiber Fabr 14:155892501988549. https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501988549710.1177/1558925019885497 ↗
36. Venkataraman D, Shabani E, Park JH (2023) Advancement of nonwoven fabrics in personal protective equipment. Materials 16:3964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1611396410.3390/ma16113964 ↗
37. Culfa G, Sarıoğlu E, Daşdemir M, Çelikten E, Kaya Nacarkahya T (2022) Investigation of fluid distribution and rewet performance with the use of different inner layer design and top sheets in sanitary napkins. Tekstil ve Mühendis 29:301–307. https://doi.org/10.7216/teksmuh.122253510.7216/teksmuh.1222535 ↗
38. Duquette D, Dumont MJ (2019) Comparative studies of chemical crosslinking reactions and applications of bio-based hydrogels. Polym Bull 76:2683–271010.1007/s00289-018-2516-6 ↗
39. Fang S, Wang G, Xing R, Chen X, Liu S, Qin Y, Li K, Wang X, Li R, Li P (2019) Synthesis of superabsorbent polymers based on chitosan derivative graft acrylic acid-co-acrylamide and its property testing. Int J Biol Macromol 132:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.17610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.176 ↗
40. Chen J, Wu J, Raffa P, Picchioni F, Koning CE (2022) Superabsorbent polymers: from long-established, microplastics generating systems, to sustainable, biodegradable and future proof alternatives. Prog Polym Sci 125:101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.10147510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101475 ↗
41. Gosden D, Studley M, Rossiter J (2023) Material extrusion of sodium polyacrylate superabsorbent polymer. Addit Manuf 78:103886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10388610.1016/j.addma.2023.103886 ↗
42. Mas’ud Z, Khotib M, Farid M, Nur A, Amroni M (2013) Superabsorbent derived from cassava waste pulp. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 2:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7715-2-810.1186/2251-7715-2-8 ↗
43. Qi Z, Hu X (2022) Water absorbency of super absorbent polymer based on flexible polymeric network. Eur Polym J 166:111045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11104510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111045 ↗
44. Zhao C, Zhang M, Liu Z, Guo Y, Zhang Q (2019) Salt-tolerant superabsorbent polymer with high capacity of water-nutrient retention derived from sulfamic acid-modified starch. ACS Omega 4:5923–5930. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b0048610.1021/acsomega.9b00486 ↗
45. Peberdy E, Jones A, Green D (2019) A study into public awareness of the environmental impact of menstrual products and product choice. Sustainability 11:473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1102047310.3390/su11020473 ↗
46. Williams JD, Frowen KE, Nixon RL (2007) Allergic contact dermatitis from methyldibromo glutaronitrile in a sanitary pad and review of Australian clinic data. Contact Dermatitis 56:164–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01040.x10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01040.x ↗
47. Gadhave RVI (2022) Starch grafted water resistant polyvinyl acetate-based wood adhesive: a review. Open J Org Polym Mater 12:17–30. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojopm.2022.12200210.4236/ojopm.2022.122002 ↗
48. Scranton A (2022) What’s in your period product? An investigation of ingredients disclosed on product labels. In: Women’s Voices for the Earth. www.womensvoices.orgorcall. Accessed 18 Feb 2025
49. VIHAR V (2021) Development and compliance of quality standards for disposable and reusable menstrual health pads in LMICs. In: Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition. https://www.rhsupplies.org/fileadmin/uploads/rhsc/Uploads/Other/Standards_for_Menstrual_Products_-_Summary_Report.pdf. Accessed 18 Feb 2025
50. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Obstetrics & Gynecology Devices Branch, Division of Reproductive A and RD, Office of Device Evaluation (2005) Menstrual Tampons and Pads: Information for Premarket Notification Submissions (510(k)s) - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
51. Critchley HOD, Babayev E, Bulun SE, Clark S, Garcia-Grau I, Gregersen PK, Kilcoyne A, Kim J-YJ, Lavender M, Marsh EE, Matteson KA, Maybin JA, Metz CN, Moreno I, Silk K, Sommer M, Simon C, Tariyal R, Taylor HS, Wagner GP, Griffith LG (2020) Menstruation: science and society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 223:624–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.00410.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.004 ↗
52. Chaban B, Links MG, Jayaprakash TP, Wagner EC, Bourque DK, Lohn Z, Albert AY, van Schalkwyk J, Reid G, Hemmingsen SM, Hill JE, Money DM (2014) Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of healthy Canadian women through the menstrual cycle. Microbiome 2:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-2310.1186/2049-2618-2-23 ↗
53. Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, Giraldo PC, Witkin SS (2011) Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:120.e1-120.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.01010.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.010 ↗
54. Günther V, Allahqoli L, Watrowski R, Maass N, Ackermann J, von Otte S, Alkatout I (2022) Vaginal Microbiome in Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostics 12:1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics1208194810.3390/diagnostics12081948 ↗
55. Ratten LK, Plummer EL, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Murray GL, Garland SM, Bateson D, Tachedjian G, Masson L, Vodstrcil LA (2021) The effect of exogenous sex steroids on the vaginal microbiota: a systematic review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:732423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.73242310.3389/fcimb.2021.732423 ↗
56. Kindinger LM, Bennett PR, Lee YS, Marchesi JR, Smith A, Cacciatore S, Holmes E, Nicholson JK, Teoh TG, MacIntyre DA (2017) The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk. Microbiome 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0223-910.1186/s40168-016-0223-9 ↗
57. Tierno PM, Hanna BA (1989) Ecology of toxic shock syndrome: amplification of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 by materials of medical interest. Rev Infect Dis 11:S182–S18710.1093/clinids/11.Supplement_1.S182 ↗
58. Nonfoux L, Chiaruzzi M, Badiou C, Baude J, Tristan A, Thioulouse J, Muller D, Prigent-Combaret C, Lina G (2018) Impact of currently marketed tampons and menstrual cups on Staphylococcus aureus growth and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 production in vitro. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:00351–00418. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00351-1810.1128/AEM.00351-18 ↗
59. Fletcher J (2023) What causes pad rash, and what does it look like? In: Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/pad-rash. Accessed 18 Feb 2025
60. Larsen WG (1979) Sanitary napkin dermatitis due to the perfume. Arch Dermatol 115:363. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1979.0401003006502710.1001/archderm.1979.04010030065027 ↗
61. Bråred Christensson J, Hagvall L, Karlberg A-T (2016) Fragrance allergens, overview with a focus on recent developments and understanding of abiotic and biotic activation. Cosmetics 3:19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics302001910.3390/cosmetics3020019 ↗
62. Sauder MB, Pratt MD (2015) Acrylate systemic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 26:235–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.000000000000013610.1097/DER.0000000000000136 ↗
63. Coll R, Udas S, Jacoby WA (2001) Conversion of the rosin acid fraction of crude tall oil into fuels and chemicals. Energy Fuels 15:1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010018a10.1021/ef010018a ↗
64. Rademaker M (2004) Allergic contact dermatitis to a sanitary pad. Australas J Dermatol 45:234–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2004.00105.x10.1111/j.1440-0960.2004.00105.x ↗
65. Salzano G, Galletta F, Caminiti L, Lonia P, Donia V, Pajno GB, Passanisi S, Lombardo F (2021) Vulvar contact dermatitis caused by sensitization to colophonium in a patient with type 1 diabetes. Contact Dermatitis 85:364–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.1385110.1111/cod.13851 ↗
66. Wujanto L, Wakelin S (2012) Allergic contact dermatitis to colophonium in a sanitary pad-an overlooked allergen? Contact Dermatitis 66:161–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02006.x10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02006.x ↗
67. Kanerva L, Rintala H, Henriks-Eckerman K, Engström K (2001) Colophonium in sanitary pads. Contact Dermatitis 44:53–54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440107-27.x10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.440107-27.x ↗
68. Sun Y, Li C, Yan Y, Lai A, Peng X, Yue X, Li Y, Liu J, Liu Y (2022) Effects of hemp sanitary pads on the vaginal microecology. Comput Math Methods Med 2022:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/443572210.1155/2022/4435722 ↗
69. Kim YJ, Kwon A, Jung MK, Kim KE, Suh J, Chae HW, Kim DH, Ha S, Seo GH, Kim H-S (2019) Incidence and prevalence of central precocious puberty in Korea: an epidemiologic study based on a national database. J Pediatr 208:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.02210.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.022 ↗
70. Gao CJ, Wang F, Shen HM, Kannan K, Guo Y (2020) Feminine hygiene products - a neglected source of phthalate exposure in women. Environ Sci Technol 54:930–937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b0392710.1021/acs.est.9b03927 ↗
71. Tang Z, Chai M, Cheng J, Wang Y, Huang Q (2019) Occurrence and distribution of phthalates in sanitary napkins from six countries: implications for women’s health. Environ Sci Technol 53:13919–13928. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b0383810.1021/acs.est.9b03838 ↗
72. Gao C-J, Kannan K (2020) Phthalates, bisphenols, parabens, and triclocarban in feminine hygiene products from the United States and their implications for human exposure. Environ Int 136:105465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.10546510.1016/j.envint.2020.105465 ↗
73. Narancic T, Verstichel S, Reddy Chaganti S, Morales-Gamez L, Kenny ST, De Wilde B, Babu Padamati R, O’Connor KE (2018) Biodegradable plastic blends create new possibilities for end-of-life management of plastics but they are not a panacea for plastic pollution. Environ Sci Technol 52:10441–10452. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b0296310.1021/acs.est.8b02963 ↗
74. González-Pleiter M, Tamayo-Belda M, Pulido-Reyes G, Amariei G, Leganés F, Rosal R, Fernández-Piñas F (2019) Secondary nanoplastics released from a biodegradable microplastic severely impact freshwater environments. Environ Sci Nano 6:1382–1392. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EN01427B10.1039/C8EN01427B ↗
75. Wayman C, Niemann H (2021) The fate of plastic in the ocean environment – a minireview. Environ Sci Process Impacts 23:198–212. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EM00446D10.1039/D0EM00446D ↗
76. Esterhuizen M, Kim YJ (2022) Effects of polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, polyurethane, high-density polyethylene, and polystyrene microplastic on Nelumbo nucifera (Lotus) in water and sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:17580–17590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17033-010.1007/s11356-021-17033-0 ↗
77. Hameed MSA, Sreedharan SP, Sivapragasam P, Chakraborty S, Devarajulu C, Sivagami K (2024) Resource recovery from soiled sanitary napkin waste—a state-of-the-art review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31:30336–30352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33218-910.1007/s11356-024-33218-9 ↗
78. Mazhandu ZS, Muzenda E, Belaid M, Mamvura TA, Nhubu T (2021) A review of plastic waste management practices what can South Africa learn? Adv Sci Technol Eng Syst J 6:1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060211610.25046/aj0602116 ↗
79. Chamas A, Moon H, Zheng J, Qiu Y, Tabassum T, Jang JH, Abu-Omar M, Scott SL, Suh S (2020) Degradation rates of plastics in the environment. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:3494–3511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0663510.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06635 ↗
80. Della Torre C, Bergami E, Salvati A, Faleri C, Cirino P, Dawson KA, Corsi I (2014) Accumulation and embryotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles at early stage of development of sea urchin embryos Paracentrotus lividus. Environ Sci Technol 48:12302–12311. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502569w10.1021/es502569w ↗
81. Besseling E, Wang B, Lürling M, Koelmans AA (2014) Nanoplastic affects growth of S. obliquus and reproduction of D. magna. Environ Sci Technol 48:12336–12343. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503001d10.1021/es503001d ↗
82. Cedervall T, Hansson L-A, Lard M, Frohm B, Linse S (2012) Food chain transport of nanoparticles affects behaviour and fat metabolism in fish. PLoS ONE 7:e32254. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.003225410.1371/journal.pone.0032254 ↗
83. Mattsson K, Johnson EV, Malmendal A, Linse S, Hansson L-A, Cedervall T (2017) Brain damage and behavioural disorders in fish induced by plastic nanoparticles delivered through the food chain. Sci Rep 7:11452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10813-010.1038/s41598-017-10813-0 ↗
84. Lehner R, Weder C, Petri-Fink A, Rothen-Rutishauser B (2019) Emergence of nanoplastic in the environment and possible impact on human health. Environ Sci Technol 53:1748–1765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b0551210.1021/acs.est.8b05512 ↗
85. Velasco Perez M, Sotelo Navarro PX, Vazquez Morillas A, Espinosa Valdemar RM, Hermoso Lopez Araiza JP (2021) Waste management and environmental impact of absorbent hygiene products: a review. Waste Manag Res: J Sustain Circ Econ 39:767–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X2095427110.1177/0734242X20954271 ↗
86. Kaur R, Kaur K, Kaur R (2018) Menstrual hygiene, management, and waste disposal: practices and challenges faced by girls/women of developing countries. J Environ Public Health 2018:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/173096410.1155/2018/1730964 ↗
87. Shibly MDMH, Hossain MA, Hossain MF, Nur MG, Hossain MB (2021) Development of biopolymer-based menstrual pad and quality analysis against commercial merchandise. Bull Natl Res Cent 45:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00504-210.1186/s42269-021-00504-2 ↗
88. Paixão LC, Lopes IA, Barros Filho AKD, Santana AA (2019) Alginate biofilms plasticized with hydrophilic and hydrophobic plasticizers for application in food packaging. J Appl Polym Sci 136:48263. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4826310.1002/app.48263 ↗
89. Wang H-M, Yuan T-Q, Song G-Y, Sun R-C (2021) Advanced and versatile lignin-derived biodegradable composite film materials toward a sustainable world. Green Chem 23:3790–3817. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00790D10.1039/D1GC00790D ↗
90. Amin MdR, Chowdhury MA, Kowser MdA (2019) Characterization and performance analysis of composite bioplastics synthesized using titanium dioxide nanoparticles with corn starch. Heliyon 5:e02009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0200910.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02009 ↗
91. Azmin SNHM, Hayat NABM, Nor MSM (2020) Development and characterization of food packaging bioplastic film from cocoa pod husk cellulose incorporated with sugarcane bagasse fibre. J Bioresour Bioprod 5:248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2020.10.00310.1016/j.jobab.2020.10.003 ↗
92. Priyadarshi R, Rhim J-W (2020) Chitosan-based biodegradable functional films for food packaging applications. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 62:102346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.10234610.1016/j.ifset.2020.102346 ↗
93. Naser AZ, Deiab I, Darras BM (2021) Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), green alternatives to petroleum-based plastics: a review. RSC Adv 11:17151–17196. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02390J10.1039/D1RA02390J ↗
94. Rafiqah SA, Khalina A, Harmaen AS, Tawakkal IA, Zaman K, Asim M, Nurrazi MN, Lee CH (2021) A review on properties and application of bio-based poly(butylene succinate). Polymers (Basel) 13:1436. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309143610.3390/polym13091436 ↗
95. Lambert S, Wagner M (2017) Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: the road ahead. Chem Soc Rev 46:6855–6871. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00149E10.1039/C7CS00149E ↗
96. Foster J, Montgomery P (2021) A study of environmentally friendly menstrual absorbents in the context of social change for adolescent girls in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:9766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1818976610.3390/ijerph18189766 ↗
97. Sareen S (2021) Sustainable menstrual alternatives: the journey so far. Int J Home Sci 7:216–219. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34990.4384210.13140/RG.2.2.34990.43842 ↗
98. Achuthan K, Muthupalani S, Kolil VK, Bist A, Sreesuthan K, Sreedevi A (2021) A novel banana fiber pad for menstrual hygiene in India: a feasibility and acceptability study. BMC Womens Health 21:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01265-w10.1186/s12905-021-01265-w ↗
99. Choudhary J, Bhattacharjee M (2018) A study on consumption pattern of sanitary napkin and environment degradation. AISECT Univ J 15:906–911
100. Gayathiri B, Gayathiri V (2018) Formulation of bacterial and fungal isolates for the degradation of sanitary napkins in in vitro conditions. Asian J Microbiol Biotechnol Environ Sci 20:S230–S236