DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-07Open access

Laser-induced graphene electrode-based supercapacitors: insight on the influence of aqueous electrolytes on its energy storage potential

Jadan Resnik Jaleel UC, Somashekara Bhat, Y. N. Sudhakar, Ankitha Rao, Vipin Cyriac, Shounak De

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 26
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Abstract Flexible supercapacitors based on laser-induced graphene (LIG) have emerged as a promising solution for scalable and cost-effective energy storage applications owing to their ease of fabrication and eco-friendly nature. However, the role of aqueous electrolytes in energy storage and conduction in thin-film electrodes has not yet been well explored. This study focused on optimizing the laser parameters, including the laser speed and power, to enhance the properties of LIG electrodes while investigating the influence of different aqueous electrolytes on electrochemical performance. The optimized laser parameters were a laser speed of 180 mm s−1 and power of 40 W. The optimized electrodes were characterized using Raman spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface parameter study. The characterization results revealed that the optimized LIG was highly defective, with an I D/I G ratio of 2.38, surface area of 25.146 m2 g−1, and pore diameter of 13.74 nm. Supercapacitors with H2SO4 exhibited a superior areal capacitance (34 mF cm−2) because of their high ionic conductivity, redox activity, and efficient H⁺ ion transport (hydrated radius: 2.8 Å). Na2SO4 and KOH showed lower capacitance (15 and 17 mF cm−2), limited by larger Na+ and K+ hydrated radii. The defect density increased fivefold compared to the benchmarks, enhancing the electrochemical performance eightfold. These findings underscore the role of laser parameter optimization in improving LIG-based energy-storage devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Energy storageNanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. Jaiswal KK, Chowdhury CR, Yadav D et al (2022) Renewable and sustainable clean energy development and impact on social, economic, and environmental health. Energy Nexus 7:100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.10011810.1016/j.nexus.2022.100118 ↗
2. Ran J, Liu Y, Feng H et al (2024) A review on graphene-based electrode materials for supercapacitor. J Ind Eng Chem 137:106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.03.04310.1016/j.jiec.2024.03.043 ↗
3. Baranwal RK, Biswas N, Oraon B, Majumdar G (2020) Advances in surface engineering for improved energy storage. In: Encyclopedia of renewable and sustainable materials. Elsevier, pp 245–24910.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.11053-7 ↗
4. Wang Y, Xu T, Liu K et al (2024) Biomass-based materials for advanced supercapacitor: principles, progress, and perspectives. Aggregate 5:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/agt2.42810.1002/agt2.428 ↗
5. Dar MA, Majid SR, Satgunam M et al (2024) Advancements in Supercapacitor electrodes and perspectives for future energy storage technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energy 70:10–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.19110.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.191 ↗
6. Wang Y, Chang Z, Qian M et al (2019) A bridge between battery and supercapacitor for power/energy gap by using dual redox-active ions electrolyte. Chem Eng J 375:122054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12205410.1016/j.cej.2019.122054 ↗
7. Lakshmi KCS, Vedhanarayanan B (2023) High-performance supercapacitors: a comprehensive review on paradigm shift of conventional energy storage devices. Batteries 9:202. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries904020210.3390/batteries9040202 ↗
8. Salleh NA, Kheawhom S, Noor Ashrina A et al (2023) Electrode polymer binders for supercapacitor applications: a review. J Mater Res Technol 23:3470–3491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.01310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.013 ↗
9. Chen H, Ling M, Hencz L et al (2018) Exploring chemical, mechanical, and electrical functionalities of binders for advanced energy-storage devices. Chem Rev 118:8936–8982. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00241 ↗
10. Shen K, Zhai S, Wang S et al (2021) Recent progress in binder-free electrodes synthesis for electrochemical energy storage application. Batter Supercaps 4:860–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.20200027110.1002/batt.202000271 ↗
11. Lin J, Peng Z, Liu Y et al (2014) Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun 5:5714. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
12. Qiu H-J, Kang JL, Liu P et al (2014) Fabrication of large-scale nanoporous nickel with a tunable pore size for energy storage. J Power Sources 247:896–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.070 ↗
13. Shi Z, Liu E, Chen B et al (2024) The role of Mn in widening the potential window of solid solution derived electrodes for aqueous supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A Mater 12:13106–13115. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA00979G10.1039/D4TA00979G ↗
14. Ma X, Sha J, Chen B et al (2025) Structurally integrated 3D vertically porous Ni@NiOx(MnOx) electrode for high-performance filter electrochemical capacitor. Energy Storage Mater 75:104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2025.10408310.1016/j.ensm.2025.104083 ↗
15. Zhang Z, Zhu H, Zhang W et al (2023) A review of laser-induced graphene: From experimental and theoretical fabrication processes to emerging applications. Carbon N Y 214:118356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.11835610.1016/j.carbon.2023.118356 ↗
16. Chakraborty M, J Hashmi MS (2018) Potential of graphene for miniature sensors and conducting devices for biomedical applications. In: Reference module in materials science and materials engineering. Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10320-0 ↗
17. Nam J, Yang J, Zhao Y, Kim KS (2024) Chemical vapor deposition of graphene and its characterizations and applications. Curr Appl Phys 61:55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2024.02.01010.1016/j.cap.2024.02.010 ↗
18. Liu Y, Yu J, Zhao Y et al (2024) Valorization of waste graphite in spent lithium-ion batteries to graphene via modified mechanical exfoliation and the mechanism exploration. J Clean Prod 449:141823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14182310.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141823 ↗
19. Dananjaya V, Marimuthu S, Yang R (Chunhui), et al (2024) Synthesis, properties, applications, 3D printing and machine learning of graphene quantum dots in polymer nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 144:101282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.10128210.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101282 ↗
20. Le TD, Phan H, Kwon S et al (2022) recent advances in laser-induced graphene: mechanism, fabrication, properties, and applications in flexible electronics. Adv Funct Mater 32:2205158. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20220515810.1002/adfm.202205158 ↗
21. Jones M (2012) Component technology. In: Valve amplifiers. Elsevier, pp 239–33110.1016/B978-0-08-096640-3.00004-6 ↗
22. Zhang Y, Liu L, Zhang P et al (2019) Ultra-high surface area and nitrogen-rich porous carbons prepared by a low-temperature activation method with superior gas selective adsorption and outstanding supercapacitance performance. Chem Eng J 355:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.16910.1016/j.cej.2018.08.169 ↗
23. Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhao H et al (2022) Biomass-derived porous carbon with a good balance between high specific surface area and Mesopore volume for supercapacitors. Nanomaterials 12:3804. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1221380410.3390/nano12213804 ↗
24. Hawes GF, Verma P, Uceda M et al (2023) Salt-induced doping and templating of laser-induced graphene supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:10570–10584. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c1747610.1021/acsami.2c17476 ↗
25. Rag SA, Selvakumar M, De S et al (2022) Laser induced graphene with biopolymer electrolyte for supercapacitor applications. Mater Today Proc 48:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.79110.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.791 ↗
26. Fu C, Kuang Y, Huang Z et al (2011) Supercapacitor based on graphene and ionic liquid electrolyte. J Solid State Electrochem 15:2581–2585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-010-1248-910.1007/s10008-010-1248-9 ↗
27. Lan S, Yu C, Yu J et al (2024) Recent advances in low-temperature liquid electrolyte for supercapacitors. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20230928610.1002/smll.202309286 ↗
28. Oh YJ, Yoo JJ, Il KY et al (2014) Oxygen functional groups and electrochemical capacitive behavior of incompletely reduced graphene oxides as a thin-film electrode of supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 116:118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.04010.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.040 ↗
29. Aljafari B, Alamro T, Ram MK, Takshi A (2019) Polyvinyl alcohol-acid redox active gel electrolytes for electrical double-layer capacitor devices. J Solid State Electrochem 23:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-018-4120-y10.1007/s10008-018-4120-y ↗
30. Iqbal MZ, Zakar S, Haider SS (2020) Role of aqueous electrolytes on the performance of electrochemical energy storage device. J Electroanal Chem 858:113793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.11379310.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113793 ↗
31. Sheha E (2009) Ionic conductivity and dielectric properties of plasticized PVA0.7(LiBr)0.3(H2SO4)2.7M solid acid membrane and its performance in a magnesium battery. Solid State Ion 180:1575–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2009.10.00810.1016/j.ssi.2009.10.008 ↗
32. Chen J, Lei S, Zhang S et al (2023) Dilute aqueous hybrid electrolyte with regulated core-shell-solvation structure endows safe and low-cost potassium-ion energy storage devices. Adv Funct Mater 33:2215027. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20221502710.1002/adfm.202215027 ↗
33. Wang X, Chandrabose RS, Chun S-E et al (2015) High energy density aqueous electrochemical capacitors with a KI-KOH electrolyte. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:19978–19985. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0467710.1021/acsami.5b04677 ↗
34. Qu QT, Wang B, Yang LC et al (2008) Study on electrochemical performance of activated carbon in aqueous Li2SO4, Na2SO4 and K2SO4 electrolytes. Electrochem commun 10:1652–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.02010.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.020 ↗
35. Rao A, Bhat S, De S et al (2023) Study of [EMIM] [EtSO4] ionic liquid-based gel polymer electrolyte mediated with hydroquinone redox additive for flexible supercapacitors. J Energy Storage 68:107716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.10771610.1016/j.est.2023.107716 ↗
36. Iliut M, Leordean C, Canpean V et al (2013) A new green, ascorbic acid-assisted method for versatile synthesis of Au–graphene hybrids as efficient surface-enhanced Raman scattering platforms. J Mater Chem C Mater 1:4094. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tc30177j10.1039/c3tc30177j ↗
37. Young K, Hsiao A, Yang C (2024) The effects of graphene intrinsic defects on the formation of extrinsic defects by plasma treatment. Appl Surf Sci 669:160604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16060410.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160604 ↗
38. Niefind F, Mao Q, Nayir N et al (2024) Watching (De)intercalation of 2D metals in epitaxial graphene: insight into the role of defects. Small 20:2306554. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20230655410.1002/smll.202306554 ↗
39. Liu Y, Wang Z, Veder JM et al (2018) Highly defective layered double perovskite oxide for efficient energy storage via reversible pseudocapacitive oxygen-anion intercalation. Adv Energy Mater 8:1702604. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20170260410.1002/aenm.201702604 ↗
40. Nguyen VT, Le HD, Nguyen VC et al (2013) Synthesis of multi-layer graphene films on copper tape by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition method. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:035012. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6262/4/3/03501210.1088/2043-6262/4/3/035012 ↗
41. Nag A, Simorangkir RBVB, Gawade DR et al (2022) Graphene-based wearable temperature sensors: a review. Mater Des 221:110971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11097110.1016/j.matdes.2022.110971 ↗
42. Sindhu B, Kothuru A, Sahatiya P et al (2021) Laser-induced graphene printed wearable flexible antenna-based strain sensor for wireless human motion monitoring. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 68:3189–3194. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2021.306730410.1109/TED.2021.3067304 ↗
43. Gul W, Alrobei H (2021) Effect of graphene oxide nanoparticles on the physical and mechanical properties of medium density fiberboard. Polymers (Basel) 13:1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1311181810.3390/polym13111818 ↗
44. Enaganti PK, Kothuru A, Goel S (2022) Laser-induced graphene-based miniaturized, flexible, non-volatile resistive switching memory devices. J Mater Res 37:3976–3987. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00590-610.1557/s43578-022-00590-6 ↗
45. Ravindra R, Badekai Ramachandra B (2011) High yield synthesis of carbon nanofibers in an environmental friendly route. Appl Nanosci 1:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-011-0014-310.1007/s13204-011-0014-3 ↗
46. Yang W, Liu Y, Li Q et al (2020) In situ formation of phosphorus-doped porous graphene via laser induction. RSC Adv 10:23953–23958. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA03363D10.1039/D0RA03363D ↗
47. Ye R, James DK, Tour JM (2019) Laser-induced graphene: from discovery to translation. Adv Mater 31:1803621. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180362110.1002/adma.201803621 ↗
48. Sethi M, Bantawal H, Shenoy US, Bhat DK (2019) Eco-friendly synthesis of porous graphene and its utilization as high performance supercapacitor electrode material. J Alloys Compd 799:256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.30210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.302 ↗
49. Ray A, Roth J, Saruhan B (2022) Laser-induced interdigital structured graphene electrodes based flexible micro-supercapacitor for efficient peak energy storage. Molecules 27:329. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2701032910.3390/molecules27010329 ↗
50. Yan J, Wang Q, Wei T, Fan Z (2014) Recent advances in design and fabrication of electrochemical supercapacitors with high energy densities. Adv Energy Mater 4:1300816. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20130081610.1002/aenm.201300816 ↗
51. Jeon DH (2019) Wettability in electrodes and its impact on the performance of lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater 18:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.01.00210.1016/j.ensm.2019.01.002 ↗
52. Hefter G, May PM, Sipos P, Stanley A (2003) Viscosities of concentrated electrolyte solutions. J Mol Liq 103–104:261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7322(02)00145-910.1016/S0167-7322(02)00145-9 ↗
53. Kalpana S, Bhat VS, Hegde G, Anantharamaiah PN (2024) Exploring the influence of KOH electrolyte concentration on the electrochemical properties of Co3O4-GO nanocomposite. J Phys Chem Solids 190:112019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2024.11201910.1016/j.jpcs.2024.112019 ↗
54. Zhao L, Li Y, Yu M et al (2023) Electrolyte-Wettability issues and challenges of electrode materials in electrochemical energy storage, energy conversion, and Beyond. Adv Sci 10:2300283. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20230028310.1002/advs.202300283 ↗
55. De P, Halder J, Gowda CC et al (2023) Role of porosity and diffusion coefficient in porous electrode used in supercapacitors—correlating theoretical and experimental studies. Electrochem Sci Adv 3:e2100159. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsa.20210015910.1002/elsa.202100159 ↗
56. Xu H, Fan X, Lu Y et al (2010) Preparation of an electrochemically modified graphite electrode and its electrochemical performance for pseudo-capacitors in a sulfuric acid electrolyte. Carbon N Y 48:3300–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.05110.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.051 ↗
57. Soneda Y, Yamashita J, Kodama M et al (2006) Pseudo-capacitance on exfoliated carbon fiber in sulfuric acid electrolyte. Appl Phys A 82:575–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-005-3395-x10.1007/s00339-005-3395-x ↗
58. Cui GY, Wang CY, Xiang GQ, Zhou B (2018) An electrochemical sensor based on nitrogen doped carbon material prepared from nitrogen-containing precursors. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 292:012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/292/1/01203410.1088/1757-899X/292/1/012034 ↗
59. Sankar KV, Kalai Selvan R (2015) Improved electrochemical performances of reduced graphene oxide based supercapacitor using redox additive electrolyte. Carbon N Y 90:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.02310.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.023 ↗
60. Ambrosi A, Pumera M (2016) Electrochemically exfoliated graphene and graphene oxide for energy storage and electrochemistry applications. Chem Eur J 22(1):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.20150311010.1002/chem.201503110 ↗
61. Krishnan P, Biju V (2022) Effect of electrolyte concentration on the electrochemical performance of RGO-Na2SO4 supercapacitor. Mater Today Proc 54:958–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.51210.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.512 ↗
62. Yu D, Ma Y, Chen M, Dong X (2019) KOH activation of wax gourd-derived carbon materials with high porosity and heteroatom content for aqueous or all-solid-state supercapacitors. J Colloid Interface Sci 537:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.07010.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.070 ↗
63. Mohd Hanappi MFY, Deraman M, Suleman M et al (2017) Influence of aqueous KOH and H2 SO4 electrolytes ionic parameters on the performance of carbon-based supercapacitor electrodes. Funct Mater Lett 10:1750013. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179360471750013810.1142/S1793604717500138 ↗
64. Ibukun O, Jeong* HK (2019) Effects of aqueous electrolytes in supercapacitors. New Phys Sae Mulli 69:154–158. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.69.15410.3938/NPSM.69.154 ↗
65. Chen J, Zhang G, Zhang H et al (2025) Revealing the miscibility chemistry of ionic liquids in water-in-salt electrolytes toward high-voltage and high-temperature aqueous potassium-ion supercapacitors. Sci Bull. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.02.02810.1016/j.scib.2025.02.028 ↗
66. Liu M, Yang X, Wu X et al (2022) Understanding the pore-structure dependence of supercapacitive performance for microporous carbon in aqueous KOH and H2SO4 electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 401:139422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13942210.1016/j.electacta.2021.139422 ↗
67. Soni M, Kumar P, Kumar R et al (2017) Photo-catalytic reduction of oxygenated graphene dispersions for supercapacitor applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 50:124003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa5c9f10.1088/1361-6463/aa5c9f ↗
68. Taer E, Putri A, Farma R et al (2021) The effect of potassium iodide (KI) addition to aqueous-based electrolyte (sulfuric acid/H2SO4) for increase the performance of supercapacitor cells. Mater Today Proc 44:3241–3244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.44710.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.447 ↗
69. Zhao G, Wang F, Liu M et al (2022) A high-frequency flexible symmetric supercapacitor prepared by the laser-defocused ablation of MnO2 on a carbon cloth. New Carbon Mater 37:556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(22)60600-010.1016/S1872-5805(22)60600-0 ↗
70. Athouël L, Moser F, Dugas R et al (2008) Variation of the MnO2 Birnessite structure upon charge/discharge in an electrochemical supercapacitor electrode in aqueous Na2SO4 electrolyte. J Phys Chem C 112:7270–7277. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp077302910.1021/jp0773029 ↗
71. Della Noce R, Eugénio S, Boudard M et al (2016) One-step process to form a nickel-based/carbon nanofoam composite supercapacitor electrode using Na2SO4 as an eco-friendly electrolyte. RSC Adv 6:15920–15928. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA22046G10.1039/C5RA22046G ↗
72. Zheng Y, Ding H, Zhang M (2009) Preparation and electrochemical properties of nickel oxide as a supercapacitor electrode material. Mater Res Bull 44:403–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2008.05.00210.1016/j.materresbull.2008.05.002 ↗
73. Zhao J, Wu J, Li B et al (2016) Facile synthesis of polypyrrole nanowires for high-performance supercapacitor electrode materials. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 26:237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.05.01510.1016/j.pnsc.2016.05.015 ↗
74. Zhao J, Wang S, Gao L et al (2022) NiO nanoparticles anchored on N-doped laser-induced graphene for flexible planar micro-supercapacitors. ACS Appl Nano Mater 5:11314–11323. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c0243410.1021/acsanm.2c02434 ↗
75. Fu X-Y, Shu R-Y, Ma C-J et al (2024) Graphene oxide assisted-MnO2 nanoparticles enhanced laser-induced graphene based electrodes for supercapacitor application. Electrochim Acta 481:143987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.14398710.1016/j.electacta.2024.143987 ↗
76. Bhatt MD, Kim H, Kim G (2022) Various defects in graphene: a review. RSC Adv 12:21520–21547. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA01436J10.1039/D2RA01436J ↗