Review: Enhancing bond strength of heterogeneous metal-polymer components the perspective of surface micro-nano morphology construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Czerwinski F (2021) Current trends in automotive lightweighting strategies and materials. Mater 14:6631–6658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1421663110.3390/ma14216631 ↗
2. Wang BZ, Zhang ZY, Xu GC, Zeng XL, Hu WT, Matsubae K (2023) Wrought and cast aluminum flows in China in the context of electric vehicle diffusion and automotive lightweighting. Resour Conserv Recycl 191:106877–106887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.10687710.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106877 ↗
3. Ishikawa T, Amaoka K, Masubuchi Y et al (2018) Overview of automotive structural composites technology developments in Japan. Compos Sci Technol 155:221–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.015 ↗
4. Olhan S, Antil B, Behera BK (2025) Repair technologies for structural polymeric composites: an automotive perspective. Compos Struct 352:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11871110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118711 ↗
5. Jiang J, Lan D, Li YQ et al (2024) Construction of spherical heterogeneous interface on ZnFe2O4@ C composite nanofibers for highly efficient microwave absorption. Ceram Int 50:38331–38341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.19710.1016/j.ceramint.2024.07.197 ↗
6. Rathod VT, Kumar JS, Jain A (2017) Polymer and ceramic nanocomposites for aerospace applications. APPL NANOSCI 7:519–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-017-0592-910.1007/s13204-017-0592-9 ↗
7. Parveez B, Kittur M, Badruddin IA, Kamangar S, Hussien M, Umarfarooq MA (2022) Scientific advancements in composite materials for aircraft applications: a review. Polymers 14:5007–5039. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1422500710.3390/polym14225007 ↗
8. Fereiduni E, Ghasemi A, Elbestawi M (2020) Selective laser melting of aluminum and titanium matrix composites: recent progress and potential applications in the aerospace industry. Aerospace 7:77–115. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace706007710.3390/aerospace7060077 ↗
9. Xu XF, Zhou J, Chen J (2020) Thermal transport in conductive polymer-based materials. Adv Funct Mater 30:1904704–1904716. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190470410.1002/adfm.201904704 ↗
10. Zhou Y, Xue B, Xie L, Wu CM, Zheng Q (2024) Recent advances in asymmetric structural composites for excellent electromagnetic interference shielding: a review. Chin J Polym Sci 42:693–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-024-3112-x10.1007/s10118-024-3112-x ↗
11. Barako MT, Isaacson SG, Lian FF et al (2017) Dense vertically aligned copper nanowire composites as high performance thermal interface materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:42067–42074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1231310.1021/acsami.7b12313 ↗
12. Zhang QL, Lan D, Deng SL et al (2024) Constructing multiple heterogeneous interfaces in one-dimensional carbon fiber materials for superior electromagnetic wave absorption. Carbon 226:119233–19243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.11923310.1016/j.carbon.2024.119233 ↗
13. Wang Q, Bao WN, Gao YF et al (2023) Fiber and interface failure characterization of glass fiber reinforced polymer for composite insulators after liquid permeation. Polymer 283:126293–126302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12629310.1016/j.polymer.2023.126293 ↗
14. Tao W, Su X, Chen YB, Tian Z (2019) Joint formation and fracture characteristics of laser welded CFRP/TC4 joints. J Manuf Process 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.02810.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.028 ↗
15. Golru SS, Attar MM, Ramezanzadeh B (2015) Effects of surface treatment of aluminium alloy 1050 on the adhesion and anticorrosion properties of the epoxy coating. Appl Surf Sci 345:360–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.14810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.148 ↗
16. Erturk AT, Yarar E, Vatansever F, Sahin AE, Kilinçel M, Alpay YO (2021) A comparative study of mechanical and machining performance of polymer hybrid and carbon fiber epoxy composite materials. Polym Polym Compos 29:655–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391121102062010.1177/09673911211020620 ↗
17. Quan D, Murphy N, Ivankovic A (2017) Fracture behaviour of a rubber nano-modified structural epoxy adhesive: Bond gap effects and fracture damage zone. Int J Adhes Adhes 77:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.05.001 ↗
18. Ramalho LDC, Campilho R, Belinha J, da Silva LFM (2020) Static strength prediction of adhesive joints: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes 96:102451–102492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.10245110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102451 ↗
19. Kajihara Y, Tamura Y, Kimura F, Suzuki G, Nakura N, Yamaguchi E (2018) Joining strength dependence on molding conditions and surface textures in blast-assisted metal-polymer direct joining. CIRP Ann 67:591–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.11210.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.112 ↗
20. Lambiase F (2015) Mechanical behaviour of polymer–metal hybrid joints produced by clinching using different tools. Mater Des 87:606–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.03710.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.037 ↗
21. Paul H, Luke M, Henning F (2015) Combining mechanical interlocking, force fit and direct adhesion in polymer–metal-hybrid structures–evaluation of the deformation and damage behavior. Compos Part B-Eng 73:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.013 ↗
22. Naik RK, Panda SK, Racherla V (2020) A new method for joining metal and polymer sheets in sandwich panels for highly improved interface strength. Compos Struct 251:112661–112669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11266110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112661 ↗
23. Gonzalez-Canche NG, Flores-Johnson EA, Cortes P, Carrillo JG (2018) Evaluation of surface treatments on 5052–H32 aluminum alloy for enhancing the interfacial adhesion of thermoplastic-based fiber metal laminates. Int J Adhes Adhes 82:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.01.00310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.01.003 ↗
24. Frick A, Rettenberger M, Spadaro M (2022) Evaluation of the interfacial adhesion between polymer and metal on polymer-metal hybrids. Polym Test 106:107448–107461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10744810.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107448 ↗
25. Zhao S, Kimura F, Wang S, Kajihara Y (2021) Chemical interaction at the interface of metal-plastic direct joints fabricated via injection molded direct joining. Appl Surf Sci 540:148339–148347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14833910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148339 ↗
26. Balle F, Wagner G, Eifler D (2009) Ultrasonic metal welding of aluminium sheets to carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. AEM 11:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20080027110.1002/adem.200800271 ↗
27. Huang YX, Meng XC, Xie YM, Li JC, Wan L (2019) New technique of friction-based filling stacking joining for metal and polymer. Composites Part B-Engineering 163:217–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.05010.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.050 ↗
28. Yusof F, Muhamad MR, Moshwan R, Jamaludin MF, Miyashita Y (2016) Effect of surface states on joining mechanisms and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy (A5052) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by dissimilar friction spot welding. Metals 6:101–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/met605010110.3390/met6050101 ↗
29. Tan CW, Su JH, Liu YF et al (2022) Enhanced interfacial bonding strength of laser bonded titanium alloy/CFRTP joint via hydrogen bonds interaction. Composites Part B-Engineering 239:109966–110008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10996610.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109966 ↗
30. Xia HB, Ma YW, Chen CT et al (2022) Influence of laser welding power on steel/CFRP lap joint fracture behaviors. Compos Struct 285:115247–115259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11524710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115247 ↗
31. Meng XC, Huang YX, Xie YM et al (2019) Friction self-riveting welding between polymer matrix composites and metals. COMPOS PART A-APPL S 127:105624–105636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10562410.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105624 ↗
32. Li JJ, Liu ZQ, Zhang RZ et al (2021) Surface treatment and solvent co-assisted easy direct bonding of polymer/metal. Mater Des 204:109641–109657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10964110.1016/j.matdes.2021.109641 ↗
33. Wang SY, Wang WQ, Xu YX, Tian YT, Zhang XE, Huang H (2023) Enhancing bonding synergy and mechanical response of metal/composite hybrid joints through physicochemical surface pretreatment. J Mater Process Technol 315:117923–117936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.11792310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.117923 ↗
34. Feng R, Lan D, Li Y, He Y, He Q, Wang Y (2024) Multiphase magnetic array-anchored layered Fe3O4/FeO/C composites with magnetic coupling effect for highly efficient microwave absorption. Ceram Int 50:55461–55469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.40510.1016/j.ceramint.2024.10.405 ↗
35. Vasconcelos RL, Oliveira GHM, Amancio ST, Canto LB (2023) Injection overmolding of polymer-metal hybrid structures: a review. Polym Eng Sci 63:691–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2624410.1002/pen.26244 ↗
36. Guo Y, Zhao H, Zhai D et al (2023) Micro/nano dual-scale porous surface structure of the Al alloys and improvement on the joint strength with carbon fiber reinforced PA 6 thermoplastic. Compos Part B-Eng 249:110407–110422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11040710.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110407 ↗
37. Uehara F, Matsumoto A (2016) Metal-resin bonding mediated by epoxy monolith layer. Appl Adhes Sci 4:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-016-0075-310.1186/s40563-016-0075-3 ↗
38. Sugimoto Y, Nishimura Y, Uehara F, Matsumoto A (2018) Dissimilar materials bonding using epoxy monolith. ACS Omega 3:7532–7541. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0092010.1021/acsomega.8b00920 ↗
39. Wu LH, Nagatsuka K, Nakata K (2018) Direct joining of oxygen-free copper and carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic by friction lap joining. JMST 34:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.01910.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.019 ↗
40. Su BB, Huang W, Wang XL (2019) Geometrical shape effects of surface texture on the elastic deformation in soft-EHL contacts. Tribol Trans 62:592–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2019.158602310.1080/10402004.2019.1586023 ↗
41. Gadeschi GB, Backhaus K, Knoll G (2012) Numerical analysis of laser-textured piston-rings in the hydrodynamic lubrication regime. J Tribol 134:041702–041710. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400734710.1115/1.4007347 ↗
42. Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W (2000) Experiments with three-dimensional riblets as an idealized model of shark skin. Exp Fluids 28:403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348005040010.1007/s003480050400 ↗
43. Bhushan B, Jung YC (2011) Natural and biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. Prog Mater Sci 56:1–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.003 ↗
44. Wang Q, Li Y, Lin Y et al (2024) A generic strategy to create mechanically interlocked nanocomposite/hydrogel hybrid electrodes for epidermal electronics. Nano-Micro Lett 16:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01314-z10.1007/s40820-023-01314-z ↗
45. Deng S, Jiang J, Wu D, He Q, Wang Y (2023) Three-dimensional conductive network constructed by in-situ preparation of sea urchin-like NiFe2O4 in expanded graphite for efficient microwave absorption. J Colloid Interface Sci 650:710–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.00310.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.003 ↗
46. Wu XT, Zhan LH, Zhao X, Wang X, Chang TF (2020) Effects of surface pre-treatment and adhesive quantity on interface characteristics of fiber metal laminates. Compos Interfaces 27:829–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2019.170702310.1080/09276440.2019.1707023 ↗
47. Huang YJ (2019) Effect of surface treatment on surface characteristics of carbon fibers and interfacial bonding of PMMA resin composites. Compos Interfaces 26:679–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2018.152659310.1080/09276440.2018.1526593 ↗
48. Min J, Hu J, Sun C et al (2022) Fabrication processes of metal-fiber reinforced polymer hybrid components: a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 5:651–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00393-z10.1007/s42114-021-00393-z ↗
49. Yang G, Yang T, Yuan W, Du Y (2019) The influence of surface treatment on the tensile properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites-bonded joints. Compos Part B-Eng 160:446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.09510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.095 ↗
50. Jun G, Lee J-W, Shin Y, Kim K, Hwang W (2020) Solvent-aided direct adhesion of a metal/polymer joint using micro/nano hierarchical structures. J Mater Process Technol 285:116744–116752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11674410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116744 ↗
51. Chai L, Wang Y, Jia Z et al (2022) Tunable defects and interfaces of hierarchical dandelion-like NiCo2O4 via Ostwald ripening process for high-efficiency electromagnetic wave absorption. Chem Eng J 429:132547-132558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13254710.1016/j.cej.2021.132547 ↗
52. Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Reusser E, Hämmerle CHF (2012) Effect of blasting pressure, abrasive particle size and grade on phase transformation and morphological change of dental zirconia surface. Surf Coat Tech 206:4293–4302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.04310.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.043 ↗
53. Guo CY, Tang ATH, Tsoi JKH, Matinlinna JP (2014) Effects of different blasting materials on charge generation and decay on titanium surface after sandblasting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 32:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.12.02610.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.12.026 ↗
54. Tiringer U, Kovač J, Milošev I (2017) Effects of mechanical and chemical pre-treatments on the morphology and composition of surfaces of aluminium alloys 7075–T6 and 2024–T3. Corros Sci 119:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.02.01810.1016/j.corsci.2017.02.018 ↗
55. Stępniowski WJ, Moneta M, Norek M, Michalska-Domańska M, Scarpellini A, Salerno M (2016) The influence of electrolyte composition on the growth of nanoporous anodic alumina. Electrochim Acta 211:453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.07610.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.076 ↗
56. Zuo SH, Wang L, Zhang JH et al (2023) Comparative study of resin and silane coupling agents coating treatments on bonding strength improvement of titanium and carbon fiber composites. Coatings 13:903–913. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1305090310.3390/coatings13050903 ↗
57. Wang SB, Zhai B, Zhang BM (2014) The effect of the microstructure of porous alumina films on the mechanical properties of glass-fiber-reinforced aluminum laminates. Compos Interfaces 21:381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/15685543.2014.86869210.1080/15685543.2014.868692 ↗
58. Wu D, Jiang J, Deng SL, He QC, Wang YQ (2023) Rational construction of mushroom-like Ni@N-doped carbon tubes composites with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption. J Alloys Compd 963:171230–171239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17123010.1016/j.jallcom.2023.171230 ↗
59. Yeh R-Y, Hsu R-Q (2016) Improving the adhesion of plastic/metal direct bonding by injection moulding using surface modifications. Adv Mater Process Technol 2:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2016.114776510.1080/2374068X.2016.1147765 ↗
60. Amend P, Pfindel S, Schmidt M (2013) Thermal joining of thermoplastic metal hybrids by means of mono- and polychromatic radiation. Phys Procedia 41:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.05610.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.056 ↗
61. Zielecki W, Pawlus P, Perłowski R, Dzierwa A (2013) Surface topography effect on strength of lap adhesive joints after mechanical pre-treatment. Arch Civil Mech Eng 13:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.00510.1016/j.acme.2013.02.005 ↗
62. Rudawska A (2014) Selected aspects of the effect of mechanical treatment on surface roughness and adhesive joint strength of steel sheets. Int J Adhes Adhes 50:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.03210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.01.032 ↗
63. Lindner T, Saborowski E, Scholze M, Zillmann B, Lampke T (2018) Thermal spray coatings as an adhesion promoter in metal/FRP joints. Metals 8:769–779. https://doi.org/10.3390/met810076910.3390/met8100769 ↗
64. Reina JMA, Prìeto JJN, García CA (2009) Influence of the surface finish on the shear strength of structural adhesive joints and application criteria in manufacturing processes. J Adhes 85:324–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846090288016410.1080/00218460902880164 ↗
65. Leena K, Athira KK, Bhuvaneswari S, Suraj S, Rao VL (2016) Effect of surface pre-treatment on surface characteristics and adhesive bond strength of aluminium alloy. Int J Adhes Adhes 70:265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.07.012 ↗
66. Tengsuwan S, Ohshima M (2014) Environmentally benign electroless nickel plating using supercritical carbon-dioxide on hydrophilically modified acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. Appl Surf Sci 311:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.04010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.040 ↗
67. Liu X, Li Y, Long L et al (2022) Preparation and bonding mechanisms of polymer/metal hybrid composite by nano molding technology. Nanotechnol Rev 11:1927–1934. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-012010.1515/ntrev-2022-0120 ↗
68. Wen Y, Li S, Huang J et al (2023) Micro-nano interfacial mechanical interlocking structure-property of the ultrasonic-assisted hot press molded polypropylene/aluminum alloy hybrid. J Adhes Sci Technol 37:452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2022.203471110.1080/01694243.2022.2034711 ↗
69. Han SC, Wu LH, Jiang CY et al (2020) Achieving a strong polypropylene/aluminum alloy friction spot joint via a surface laser processing pretreatment. J Adhes Sci Technol 50:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.03510.1016/j.jmst.2020.02.035 ↗
70. Kleffel T, Drummer D (2017) Investigating the suitability of roughness parameters to assess the bond strength of polymer-metal hybrid structures with mechanical adhesion. Compos Part B-Eng 117:20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.042 ↗
71. Wan H, Teng H, Lv F, Lin J, Min J (2023) Interface wetting driven by laplace pressure on multiscale topographies and its application to performance enhancement of metal-composite hybrid structure. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:18427–18439. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c2235810.1021/acsami.2c22358 ↗
72. Jiao JK, Jia SH, Xu ZF, Ye YY, Sheng LY, Zhang WW (2019) Laser direct joining of CFRTP and aluminium alloy with a hybrid surface pre-treating method. Compos Part B-Eng 173:106911–106919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10691110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106911 ↗
73. Zhang P, Chen J, Chen XM et al (2019) Study on integrally molded PA6/304 stainless steel by micro-nano pressing technology. J Adhes Sci Technol 33:511–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.154352710.1080/01694243.2018.1543527 ↗
74. Xie Y, Zhang JH, Zhou T (2019) Large-area mechanical interlocking via nanopores: ultra-high-strength direct bonding of polymer and metal materials. Appl Surf Sci 492:558–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.24610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.246 ↗
75. Tao R, Vovusha H, Li XL et al (2024) Characterizing ABS-copper chemistry-dependent adhesion: from the atomic to macro level. J Mater Res Technol 29:4384–4393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.15810.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.158 ↗
76. Zou X, Chen K, Yao HN et al (2022) Chemical reaction and bonding mechanism at the polymer-metal interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:27383–27396. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c0497110.1021/acsami.2c04971 ↗
77. Khodabakhshi F, Haghshenas M, Sahraeinejad S et al (2014) Microstructure-property characterization of a friction-stir welded joint between AA5059 aluminum alloy and high density polyethylene. Mater Charact 98:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2014.10.01310.1016/j.matchar.2014.10.013 ↗
78. Rodríguez-Vidal E, Sanz C, Lambarri J, Quintana I (2018) Experimental investigation into metal micro-patterning by laser on polymer-metal hybrid joining. Opt Laser Technol 104:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.00310.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.003 ↗
79. Arenas JM, Alía C, Narbón JJ, Ocaña R, González C (2013) Considerations for the industrial application of structural adhesive joints in the aluminium-composite material bonding. Compos Part B-Eng 44:417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.02610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.026 ↗
80. Khan AS, Dong P, Liu F, Zhang Y (2024) A state -of -the -art review on direct welding of polymer to metal for structural applications: part 2 joint design and property characterization. Weld J 103:142–150. https://doi.org/10.29391/2024.103.01310.29391/2024.103.013 ↗
81. Liu FC, Dong P, Lu W, Sun K (2019) On formation of Al-O-C bonds at aluminum/polyamide joint interface. Appl Surf Sci 466:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.02410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.024 ↗
82. Zhao SJ, Kimura F, Yamaguchi E, Horie N, Kajihara Y (2020) Manufacturing aluminum/polybutylene terephthalate direct joints by using hot water-treated aluminum via injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:4637–4644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05364-010.1007/s00170-020-05364-0 ↗
83. Nagatsuka K, Kitagawa D, Yamaoka H, Nakata K (2016) Friction lap joining of thermoplastic materials to carbon steel. ISIJ Int 56:1226–1231. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-04210.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-042 ↗
84. Choi JW, Morisada Y, Liu HH et al (2020) Dissimilar friction stir welding of pure Ti and carbon fibre reinforced plastic. Sci Technoi Weid Join 25:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2020.178881410.1080/13621718.2020.1788814 ↗
85. Nasreen A, Bangash MK, Shaker K, Nawab Y (2022) Effect of surface treatment on the performance of composite-composite and composite-metal adhesive joints. Polym Compos 43:6320–6331. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2694010.1002/pc.26940 ↗
86. Liu YD, Shigemoto Y, Hanada T, Miyamae T, Kawasaki K, Horiuchi S (2021) Role of chemical functionality in the adhesion of aluminum and isotactic polypropylene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:11497–11506. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c2298810.1021/acsami.0c22988 ↗
87. Zhang S, Zheng J, Lv C et al (2025) Synergistic enhancement of defect-induced polarization and built-in electric field effect in carbon hybrids towards efficient electromagnetic wave absorption. Carbon 234:120037–120049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2025.12003710.1016/j.carbon.2025.120037 ↗
88. Honkanen M, Hoikkanen M, Vippola M, Vuorinen J, Lepistö T (2009) Metal-plastic adhesion in injection-molded hybrids. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:1747–1761. https://doi.org/10.1163/016942409X1248944584443510.1163/016942409X12489445844435 ↗
89. Gong N, Wang B, Wang Y et al (2020) Effect of metal surface state on injection joining strength of aluminum-rubber composite part. J Manuf Process 49:365–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.00610.1016/j.jmapro.2019.12.006 ↗
90. Hoikkanen M, Honkanen M, Vippola M, Lepistö T, Vuorinen J (2011) Effect of silane treatment parameters on the silane layer formation and bonding to thermoplastic urethane. Prog Org Coat 72:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.08.00210.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.08.002 ↗
91. Li J, Li S, Fang J et al (2024) Effect of silane surface modification on the bonding properties of the hot-pressing molded polycarbonate/aluminum alloy hybrid. J Adhes Sci Technol 38:1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2023.225176810.1080/01694243.2023.2251768 ↗
92. Bi XY, Li Y, Xu MJ, Wang ZM (2023) Heteroatom introduction to reconstruct interfacial chemical structures for high-reliability CFRTP/A6061-T6 hybrid structures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15:33119–33131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c0524910.1021/acsami.3c05249 ↗
93. Li XP, Xu DH, Gong NN, Xu ZY, Wang LL, Dong WP (2019) Improving the strength of injection molded aluminum/polyphenylene sulfide lap joints dependence on surface microstructure and composition. Mater Des 179:107875–107899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10787510.1016/j.matdes.2019.107875 ↗
94. Xu D, Yang W, Li X, Hu Z, Li M, Wang L (2020) Surface nanostructure and wettability inducing high bonding strength of polyphenylene sulfide-aluminum composite structure. Appl Surf Sci 515:145996–146004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14599610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145996 ↗
95. Zhang S, Zheng J, Lan D et al (2025) Hierarchical engineering on built-in electric field of bimetallic zeolitic imidazolate derivatives towards amplified dielectric loss. Adv Funct Mater 35:2413884–2413897. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20241388410.1002/adfm.202413884 ↗
96. Sakata N, Takeda Y, Kotera M, Suzuki Y, Matsumoto A (2020) Interfacial structure control and three-dimensional X-ray imaging of an epoxy monolith bonding system with surface modification. Langmuir 36:10923–10932. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0148110.1021/acs.langmuir.0c01481 ↗
97. Samanta A, Huang W, Chaudhry H, Wang Q, Shaw SK, Ding H (2020) Design of chemical surface treatment for laser-textured metal alloys to achieve extreme wetting behavior. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:18032–18045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b2143810.1021/acsami.9b21438 ↗
98. Feng Z, Zhao H, Tan C et al (2019) Effect of laser texturing on the surface characteristics and bonding property of 30CrMnSiA steel adhesive joints. J Manuf Process 47:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.04610.1016/j.jmapro.2019.09.046 ↗
99. Bi XY, Wang ZM, Xu MJ, Li XP (2022) Femtosecond laser fabricated micro/nano interfacial structures to strengthen CFRPEEK/A6061-T6 FLJ hybrid joints. Compos Part B: Eng 231:109540–109549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10954010.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109540 ↗
100. Zhang JH, Cheng F, Wang L et al (2023) Reinforcement study of anodizing treatment with various temperatures on aluminum substrates for stronger adhesive bonding with carbon fiber composites. Surf Coat Technol 462:129473–129484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12947310.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129473 ↗