journal article·2024-10Open access

A review on nanocomposite coatings in dentistry

O. Cenk Aktas, Kathrin Puchert, Ekrem Efekan Vurucu, Bilge Ersöz, Salih Veziroglu, Sinan Sen

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 59· Issue 38

Abstract

Abstract Nanocomposite coatings have garnered significant attention for their potential applications in various fields, including dentistry. These coatings consist of a base matrix, typically a polymer, ceramic, or metal, embedded with nanoparticles that confer enhanced properties do not present in the bulk material. By incorporating nanoparticles into a suitable matrix, these coatings exhibit superior properties including bioactivity, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, antibacterial activity, and drug release capabilities. This review specifically covers the application of nanocomposites as (1) bioactive/osteoconductive coatings, (2) antibacterial/antimicrobial nanocomposite coatings, (3) tribological/corrosion protection nanocomposite coatings, and (4) drug delivery nanocomposite coatings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Hua K, Rocha I, Zhang P, Gustafsson S, Ning Y, Strømme M, Ferraz N (2016) Transition from bioinert to bioactive material by tailoring the biological cell response to carboxylated nanocellulose. Biomacromol 17(3):1224–123310.1021/acs.biomac.6b00053 ↗
2. Pezzotti G (2017) Bioceramics are not bioinert. Mater Today 20(8):395–39810.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.008 ↗
3. Safavi MS, Bordbar-Khiabani A, Walsh FC, Mozafari M, Khalil-Allafi J (2023) Surface modified NiTi smart biomaterials: surface engineering and biological compatibility. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 25:10042910.1016/j.cobme.2022.100429 ↗
4. Guo L, Steinhart M (2023) Topographical surface patterning with block copolymer stamps. Appl Surf Sci 639:15820910.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158209 ↗
5. Cremer PS (2011) Surface patterning: more than just scratching the surface. J Am Chem Soc 133(2):167–16910.1021/ja110962h ↗
6. Zheng Y, Xu P, Li L, Liu Q, Guo S (2023) Enhancing biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and corrosion resistance of laser cladding β-TiNb coatings. J Vac Sci Technol A 41:610.1116/6.0002885 ↗
7. Cao M, Xia Z, Ran X, Zou J (2021) Synthesis and characterization of poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid-co-ε-caprolactone) and its pressure sensitive adhesive property. Polymer 45(4):592–600
8. Del Monaco ADM et al (2018) Alternative methods of sterilization on films of polymers: poly(-l-lactic acid) (PLLA), poly(l-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly (-LD-lactic acid) (PLDLA), for bioresorbable vascular scaffolds models. Acad Soc J 2(4):248–256. https://doi.org/10.32640/tasj.2018.4.24810.32640/tasj.2018.4.248 ↗
9. Srisuwan Y, Baimark Y (2022) Improvement in thermal stability of flexible poly(l-lactide)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(l-lactide) bioplastic by blending with native cassava starch. Polymers 14(15):318610.3390/polym14153186 ↗
10. Marroquin JB, Rhee KY, Park SJ (2013) Chitosan nanocomposite films: enhanced electrical conductivity, thermal stability, and mechanical properties. Carbohyd Polym 92(2):1783–179110.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.042 ↗
11. Kozuki K, Kishimoto K (2010) Film thickness dependency of interfacial strength evaluation for thin film coating structure by nanoindentation method. J Solid Mech Mater Eng 4(6):771–78010.1299/jmmp.4.771 ↗
12. Jiang F, Xie H, Rong Y, Yan L (2011) Tribology performance and adhesive strength evaluation of TiAlSiN coating. Trans Tianjin Univ 17(4):248–25310.1007/s12209-011-1601-9 ↗
13. Ayanwale AP, Estrada-Capetillo BL, Reyes-López SY (2021) Antifungal activity and cytotoxicity study of ZrO2–ZnO bimetallic nanoparticles. Inorg Chem Commun 134:10895410.1016/j.inoche.2021.108954 ↗
14. Kunc F, Kennedy D (2020) Coated silver nanoparticles exhibit unique stability and cytotoxicity in media with human serum. Nanotechnol Adv Mater Sci 3:2
15. Özcan M, Hämmerle C (2012) Titanium as a reconstruction and implant material in dentistry: advantages and pitfalls. Materials 5(9):1528–154510.3390/ma5091528 ↗
16. Palazzetti R, Zucchelli AJCS (2017) Electrospun nanofibers as reinforcement for composite laminates materials—a review. Compos Struct 182:711–72710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.021 ↗
17. Jyoti J, Kiran A, Sandhu M, Kumar A, Singh BP, Kumar N (2021) Improved nanomechanical and in-vitro biocompatibility of graphene oxide-carbon nanotube hydroxyapatite hybrid composites by synergistic effect. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 117:10437610.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104376 ↗
18. Wu CS (2014) Mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and biodegradation of cross-linked cellulose acetate-reinforced polyester composites. Carbohyd Polym 105:41–4810.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.062 ↗
19. Mosher BP, Zeng T (2003) Synthesis and characterization of novel organic-inorganic nancomposite coatings. MRS Online Proc Libr 788(1):84310.1557/PROC-788-L8.43 ↗
20. Silva RC, Agrelli A, Andrade AN, Mendes-Marques CL, Arruda IR, Santos LR, Machado G (2022) Titanium dental implants: an overview of applied nanobiotechnology to improve biocompatibility and prevent infections. Materials 15(9):315010.3390/ma15093150 ↗
21. Lo Giudice R, Tribst JPM (2020) Dental materials coatings: effect on the clinical behavior. Coatings 10(12):122910.3390/coatings10121229 ↗
22. Hayashi K, Ishikawa K (2023) Endowing osseointegration ability to bioinert alumina by carbonate apatite coating. Surfaces Interfaces 36:10261710.1016/j.surfin.2022.102617 ↗
23. Williams DF (2022) Biocompatibility pathways and mechanisms for bioactive materials: the bioactivity zone. Bioact Mater 10:306–322
24. Workie AB, Shih SJ (2022) A study of bioactive glass–ceramic’s mechanical properties, apatite formation, and medical applications. RSC Adv 12(36):23143–2315210.1039/D2RA03235J ↗
25. Briggs P (1999) Hydroxylapatite coated dental implants. Br Dent J 187(2):88–8810.1038/sj.bdj.4800210a1 ↗
26. Inami C, Nishitani Y, Haraguchi N, Itsuno S (2019) Evaluation of the solubility, calcium-release ability, and apatite-forming ability of a novel chemically curable mineral trioxide aggregate material. J Hard Tissue Biol 28(3):273–28010.2485/jhtb.28.273 ↗
27. Zheng J, Zhao H, Dong E, Kang J, Liu C, Sun C, Wang L (2021) Additively-manufactured PEEK/HA porous scaffolds with highly-controllable mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C 128:11233310.1016/j.msec.2021.112333 ↗
28. Li T-T, Ling L, Lin M-C, Jiang Q, Lin Q, Lin J-H, Lou C-W (2019) Properties and mechanism of hydroxyapatite coating prepared by electrodeposition on a braid for biodegradable bone scaffolds. Nanomaterials 9(5):67910.3390/nano9050679 ↗
29. Pang X, Huang Y (2012) Physical properties of nano-HAs/ZrO2 coating on surface of titanium materials used in dental-implants and its biological compatibility. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12(2):902–91010.1166/jnn.2012.5666 ↗
30. Malmberg P, Bigdeli N, Jensen J, Nygren H (2017) Formation of hydroxyapatite on titanium implants in vivo precedes bone-formation during healing. Biointerphases 12:410.1116/1.4993986 ↗
31. Bansal P, Singh G, Sidhu HS (2020) Investigation of surface properties and corrosion behavior of plasma sprayed HA/ZnO coatings prepared on AZ31 Mg alloy. Surf Coat Technol 401:12624110.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126241 ↗
32. Baltag I, Watanabe K, Kusakari H, Taguchi N, Miyakawa O, Kobayashi M, Ito N (2000) Long-term changes of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 53:76–8510.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<76::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
33. Sharma A (2023) Hydroxyapatite coating techniques for titanium dental implants—an overview. Qeios10.32388/2E6UHN ↗
34. Salmasi S, Nayyer L, Seifalian AM, Blunn GW (2016) Nanohydroxyapatite effect on the degradation, osteoconduction and mechanical properties of polymeric bone tissue engineered scaffolds. Open Orthop J 10(3):900–91910.2174/1874325001610010900 ↗
35. Injorhor P, Trongsatitkul T, Wittayakun J, Ruksakulpiwat C, Ruksakulpiwat Y (2023) Biodegradable polylactic acid-polyhydroxyalkanoate-based nanocomposites with bio-hydroxyapatite: preparation and characterization. Polymers 15(5):126110.3390/polym15051261 ↗
36. Manzoor F, Golbang A, Jindal S, Dixon D, McIlhagger A, Harkin-Jones E, Mancuso E (2021) 3D printed PEEK/HA composites for bone tissue engineering applications: Effect of material formulation on mechanical performance and bioactive potential. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 121:10460110.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104601 ↗
37. Wen Y, Li J, Lin H, Huang H, Song K, Duan K, Weng J (2021) Improvement of drug-loading properties of hydroxyapatite particles using triethylamine as a capping agent: a novel approach. Crystals 11(6):70310.3390/cryst11060703 ↗
38. Catauro M, Barrino F, Blanco I, Piccolella S, Pacifico S (2020) Use of the sol–gel method for the preparation of coatings of titanium substrates with hydroxyapatite for biomedical application. Coatings 10(3):20310.3390/coatings10030203 ↗
39. Wang F, Guo E (2012) Preparing and structure of a porous nano-HA/CS/PVA composite by freeze-drying. Polym Polym Compos 20(1–2):1–4
40. Wong SK, Yee MMF, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S (2023) A review of the application of natural and synthetic scaffolds in bone regeneration. J Funct Biomater 14(5):28610.3390/jfb14050286 ↗
41. Li Y, Liu Y, Li R, Bai H, Zhu Z, Zhu L, Huang L (2021) Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des 210:11004910.1016/j.matdes.2021.110049 ↗
42. Campos DM, Anselme K, Soares GDDA (2012) In vitro biological evaluation of 3-D hydroxyapatite/collagen (50/50 wt(%)) scaffolds. Mater Res 15:151–15810.1590/S1516-14392011005000099 ↗
43. Yang CC, Huang CY, Lin CC, Yen SK (2010) Electrolytic deposition of collagen/HA composite on post HA∕ TiO2 coated Ti6Al4V implant alloy. J Electrochem Soc 158(2):E1310.1149/1.3525604 ↗
44. Hsu HC, Wu SC, Lin CY, Ho WF (2023) Characterization of hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite coating obtained from crab shells on low-modulus Ti–25Nb–8Sn alloy through hydrothermal treatment. Coatings 13(2):22810.3390/coatings13020228 ↗
45. Lewandowska K, Furtos G (2018) Study of apatite layer formation on SBF-treated chitosan composite thin films. Polym Test 71:173–18110.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.09.007 ↗
46. Esmael SK, Jassim RK, Al-Hiloh SA (2020) In vitro study for nano hydroxyl apatite and chitosan coated surface after immersion in simulated body fluid. Med-Leg Update 20:1919–1926
47. Zhang J, Yin HM, Hsiao BS, Zhong GJ, Li ZM (2014) Biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/hydroxyl apatite 3D porous scaffolds using high-pressure molding and salt leaching. J Mater Sci 49:1648–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7848-x10.1007/s10853-013-7848-x ↗
48. Mohseni E, Zalnezhad E, Bushroa AR (2014) Comparative investigation on the adhesion of hydroxyapatite coating on Ti–6Al–4V implant: a review paper. Int J Adhes Adhes 48:238–25710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.030 ↗
49. Javidi M, Javadpour S, Bahrololoom ME, Ma JJMS (2008) Electrophoretic deposition of natural hydroxyapatite on medical grade 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng C 28(8):1509–151510.1016/j.msec.2008.04.003 ↗
50. Mehboob H, Awais M, Khalid H, Ch AA, Siddiqi SA, Rehman I (2014) Polymer-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite coatings using electrophoretic technique. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun 26(06):145007310.4015/S1016237214500732 ↗
51. Han Y, Wei Q, Chang P, Hu K, Okoro OV, Shavandi A, Nie L (2021) Three-dimensional printing of hydroxyapatite composites for biomedical application. Crystals 11(4):35310.3390/cryst11040353 ↗
52. Garibay-Alvarado JA, Espinosa Cristóbal LF, Reyes-López SY (2017) Fibrous silica-hydroxyapatite composite by electrospinning. Producto de investigación ICB10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i2.2017.1701 ↗
53. Amirnejad M, Afshar A, Salehi S (2018) The effect of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on hydroxyapatite (HA)/TiO2 composite coating fabricated by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). J Mater Eng Perform 27:2338–234410.1007/s11665-018-3342-6 ↗
54. Kim J, Kang IG, Cheon KH, Lee S, Park S, Kim HE, Han CM (2021) Stable sol–gel hydroxyapatite coating on zirconia dental implant for improved osseointegration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 32:1–1010.1007/s10856-021-06550-6 ↗
55. Juliano H, Gapsari F, Izzuddin H, Sudiro T, Phatama KY, Sukmajaya WP, Sulaiman AM (2022) HA/ZrO2 coating on CoCr alloy using flame thermal spray10.5109/4793632 ↗
56. Sheykholeslami SOR, Khalil-Allafi J, Etminanfar M, Khalili V, Parsa AB (2023) Synthesis and development of novel spherical mesoporous SiO2/HA particles and incorporating them in electrodeposited hydroxyapatite coatings for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol 459:12941010.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129410 ↗
57. Singh H, Prakash C, Singh S (2020) Plasma spray deposition of HA-TiO2 on β-phase Ti-35Nb-7Ta-5Zr alloy for hip stem: characterization of bio-mechanical properties, wettability, and wear resistance. J Bionic Eng 17(5):1029–104410.1007/s42235-020-0081-9 ↗
58. Will J, Gerhardt LC, Boccaccini AR (2012) Bioactive glass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng III Cell Surf Interact Tissue Cult 8:195–226
59. Chen J, Zeng L, Chen X, Liao T, Zheng J (2018) Preparation and characterization of bioactive glass tablets and evaluation of bioactivity and cytotoxicity in vitro. Bioact Mater 3(3):315–321
60. Wang D, Poologasundarampillai G, Van den Bergh W, Chater RJ, Kasuga T, Jones JR, McPhail DS (2014) Strategies for the chemical analysis of highly porous bone scaffolds using secondary ion mass spectrometry. Biomed Mater 9(1):01501310.1088/1748-6041/9/1/015013 ↗
61. Zhang C, Chen S, Vigneshwaran M, Qi Y, Zhou Y, Fu G, Wang J (2023) Effect of different contents of 63S bioglass on the performance of bioglass-PCL composite bone scaffolds. Inventions 8(6):13810.3390/inventions8060138 ↗
62. Yang L, Liu S, Fang W, Chen J, Chen Y (2019) Poly(lactic co glycolic acid) bioactive glass composites as nanoporous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro and in vivo studies. Exp Ther Med 18(6):4874–4880
63. Chen Q, Garcia RP, Munoz J, PérezdeLarraya U, Garmendia N, Yao Q, Boccaccini AR (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals bioactive glass hybrid coating as bone substitutes by electrophoretic co-deposition: in situ control of mineralization of bioactive glass and enhancement of osteoblastic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(44):24715–2472510.1021/acsami.5b07294 ↗
64. Lao J, Dieudonné X, Benbakkar M, Jallot E (2017) Bioactive glass coating on gelatin scaffolds at ambient temperature: easy route to make polymer scaffolds become bioactive. J Mater Sci 52:9129–9139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0781-710.1007/s10853-017-0781-7 ↗
65. Cui X, Gu Y, Li L, Wang H, Xie Z, Luo S, Rahaman MN (2013) In vitro bioactivity, cytocompatibility, and antibiotic release profile of gentamicin sulfate-loaded borate bioactive glass/chitosan composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24:2391–240310.1007/s10856-013-4996-0 ↗
66. Abdraboh AS, Bakr AM, Ereiba KT (2023) Fabrication and characterization of silver-substituted bioactiveglass incorporated with sodium alginate and graphene oxide. Mater Chem Phys 301:12771610.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127716 ↗
67. Li Y, Zhang W, Niu J, Chen Y (2012) Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6(6):5164–517310.1021/nn300934k ↗
68. Maruthapandi M, Saravanan A, Gupta A, Luong JH, Gedanken A (2022) Antimicrobial activities of conducting polymers and their composites. Macromol 2(1):78–9910.3390/macromol2010005 ↗
69. More PR, Pandit S, Filippis AD, Franci G, Mijakovic I, Galdiero M (2023) Silver nanoparticles: bactericidal and mechanistic approach against drug resistant pathogens. Microorganisms 11(2):36910.3390/microorganisms11020369 ↗
70. Shihab RN, Al-Dahbi AM, Mohammed Hussein SA (2020) The synergistic effect of combining some antibiotics with powder of silver NPs, copper NPs and titanium NPs. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 14:4
71. Suo H, Peng C, Jing F, Yu S, Cui S, Shen X (2019) Facile preparation of TiO2/ZnO composite aerogel with excellent antibacterial activities. Mater Lett 234:253–25610.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.106 ↗
72. Shariatinia Z, Nikfar Z, Gholivand K, Abolghasemi Tarei S (2015) Antibacterial activities of novel nanocomposite biofilms of chitosan/phosphoramide/Ag NPs. Polym Compos 36(3):454–46610.1002/pc.22960 ↗
73. Losytskyy MY, Kharchenko RA, Harahuts YI, Shirinyan EA, Malinovska YV, Kutsevol NV, Yashchuk VM (2019). Different effect of polymer-incorporated nanoparticles of Au and Ag on hematoporphyrin interaction with graft polymers. Funct Mater10.15407/fm26.01.107 ↗
74. Pimentel A, Nunes D, Pereira S, Martins R, Fortunato E (2016) Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanostructured arrays prepared by microwave-assisted solvothermal method. Semiconduct Photocatal Mater Mech Appl 9:24
75. Gudkov SV, Burmistrov DE, Serov DA, Rebezov MB, Semenova AA, Lisitsyn AB (2021) A mini review of antibacterial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Front Phys 9:64148110.3389/fphy.2021.641481 ↗
76. Chen FC, Huang CM, Yu XW, Chen YY (2022) Effect of nano zinc oxide on proliferation and toxicity of human gingival cells. Hum Exp Toxicol 41:0960327122108023610.1177/09603271221080237 ↗
77. Geuli O, Lewinstein I, Mandler D (2019) Composition-tailoring of ZnO-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite as bioactive and antibacterial coating. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2(5):2946–295710.1021/acsanm.9b00369 ↗
78. Zamani M, Rostami M, Aghajanzadeh M, Kheiri Manjili H, Rostamizadeh K, Danafar H (2018) Mesoporous titanium dioxide zinc oxide–graphene oxide nanocarriers for colon-specific drug delivery. J Mater Sci 53(3):1634–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1673-610.1007/s10853-017-1673-6 ↗
79. Sezer N, Ali A, Atieh MA, Koc M (2017) Synthesis and characterization of graphene/zinc oxide nanocomposites. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, vol 58431. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V008T10A01910.1115/IMECE2017-71291 ↗
80. Bouchecham A, Karaali A, Keriti Y (2016) Thermally oxidized Ti6Al4V alloys enhance the corrosion behavior. Dent Mater 1(32):e5310.1016/j.dental.2016.08.109 ↗
81. Wichelhaus A, Geserick M, Hibst R, Sander FG (2005) The effect of surface treatment and clinical use on friction in NiTi orthodontic wires. Dent Mater 21(10):938–94510.1016/j.dental.2004.11.011 ↗
82. Hussain SZ, Ihrar M, Hussain SB, Oh WC, Ullah K (2020) A review on graphene based transition metal oxide composites and its application towards supercapacitor electrodes. SN Appl Sci 2:1–2310.1007/s42452-020-2515-8 ↗
83. Govindasamy M, Wang SF, Alothman AA, Alshgari RA, Ganesh PS (2021) Synergetic effect of the ultrasonic-assisted hydrothermal process on the photocatalytic performance of MoS2 and WS2 nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 6:1–10
84. Gracco A, Dandrea M, Deflorian F, Zanella C, De Stefani A, Bruno G, Stellini E (2019) Application of a molybdenum and tungsten disulfide coating to improve tribological properties of orthodontic archwires. Nanomaterials 9(5):75310.3390/nano9050753 ↗
85. Cordeiro JM, Beline T, Ribeiro ALR, Rangel EC, da Cruz NC, Landers R, Barão VA (2017) Development of binary and ternary titanium alloys for dental implants. Dent Mater 33(11):1244–125710.1016/j.dental.2017.07.013 ↗
86. Shahmohammadi M, Sun Y, Yuan JCC, Mathew MT, Sukotjo C, Takoudis CG (2022) In vitro corrosion behavior of coated Ti6Al4V with TiO2, ZrO2, and TiO2/ZrO2 mixed nanofilms using atomic layer deposition for dental implants. Surf Coat Technol 444:12868610.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128686 ↗
87. Dini FW, Helmiyati H, Krisnandi YK (2021) Cellulose and TiO2–ZrO2 nanocomposite as a catalyst for glucose conversion to 5-EMF. Bull Chem React Eng Catal 16(2):320–33010.9767/bcrec.16.2.10320.320-330 ↗
88. Vergallo C, Hafeez MN, Iannotta D, Santos HA, d’Avanzo N, Dini L, Christian C (2021) Conventional nanosized drug delivery systems for cancer applications. Bio-Nanomed Cancer Ther 8:3–2710.1007/978-3-030-58174-9_1 ↗
89. Kumbhar AB, Chaudhari PD, Karimunnisa S (2022) Nanocomposite based drug delivery for periodontal disease. Int J Health Sci 6(S9):2982–299510.53730/ijhs.v6nS9.13188 ↗
90. Basudan AM (2022) Nanoparticle based periodontal drug delivery–A review on current trends and future perspectives. Saudi Dent J 34(8):669–68010.1016/j.sdentj.2022.09.006 ↗
91. Pijls BG, Sanders IM, Kuijper EJ, Nelissen RGHH (2022) Effectiveness of mechanical cleaning, antibiotics, and induction heating on eradication of Staphylococcus aureus in mature biofilms. Bone Joint Res 11(9):629–63810.1302/2046-3758.119.BJR-2022-0010.R1 ↗
92. Zięba M, Chaber P, Duale K, Martinka Maksymiak M, Basczok M, Kowalczuk M, Adamus G (2020) Polymeric carriers for delivery systems in the treatment of chronic periodontal disease. Polymers 12(7):157410.3390/polym12071574 ↗
93. Yu L, Liu S, Jia S, Xu F (2023) Emerging frontiers in drug delivery with special focus on novel techniques for targeted therapies. Biomed Pharmacother 165:11504910.1016/j.biopha.2023.115049 ↗
94. Espanol L, Larrea A, Andreu V, Mendoza G, Arruebo M, Sebastian V, Santamaria J (2016) Dual encapsulation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs in PLGA nanoparticles by a single-step method: drug delivery and cytotoxicity assays. RSC Adv 6(112):111060–11106910.1039/C6RA23620K ↗
95. Dias AP, da Silva Santos S, da Silva JV, Parise-Filho R, Ferreira EI, El Seoud O, Giarolla J (2020) Dendrimers in the context of nanomedicine. Int J Pharm 573:11881410.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118814 ↗
96. Shahzadi S, Zafar N, Sharif R (2018) Antibacterial activity of metallic nanoparticles. Bact Pathog Antibact Control 51:105772
97. Kesharwani P, Bisht A, Alexander A, Dave V, Sharma S (2021) Biomedical applications of hydrogels in drug delivery system: an update. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 66:10291410.1016/j.jddst.2021.102914 ↗
98. Jarach N, Dodiuk H, Kenig S (2020) Polymers in the medical antiviral front-line. Polymers 12(8):172710.3390/polym12081727 ↗
99. Ho BN, Pfeffer CM, Singh AT (2017) Update on nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems in cancer treatment. Anticancer Res 37(11):5975–5981
100. Zhang Y, Wu Y, Du H, Li Z, Bai X, Wu Y, Chen X (2023) Nano-drug delivery systems in oral cancer therapy: recent developments and prospective. Pharmaceutics 16(1):710.3390/pharmaceutics16010007 ↗