Review: functionalization of biopolymer-based electrospun nanofibers for wound healing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The problem of impaired wound healing poses significant challenges in clinical practice. Factors such as chronic diseases and aging can adversely impact the healing process, leading to delayed wound healing. Additionally, the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a threat by increasing the risk of wound infections. As a result, advanced wound dressings, tissue engineering, and bioactive molecules incorporation are being actively used to address these challenges and improve wound-healing outcomes. Biopolymer-based electrospun nanofibers have emerged as a promising approach in the field of wound healing. These nanofibers, composed of biocompatible and biodegradable materials, possess unique properties that mimic the extracellular matrix which make them suitable for promoting effective tissue regeneration. By incorporating various functional groups and bioactive molecules into the biopolymer matrix, the nanofibers can be tailored to exhibit specific properties such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and cell-adhesive properties. Furthermore, the controlled release of therapeutics from the functionalized nanofibers provides localized treatment, promoting efficient healing and minimizing potential side effects. Overall, functionalized biopolymer-based electrospun nanofibers hold great promise as advanced wound dressings, offering a versatile platform for accelerating wound healing and improving patient outcomes. This review is briefly representing the different types of electrospun biopolymers and their different manufacturing techniques in addition to the different ways of functionalization to be used in wound healing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, Gurtner GC (2019) Wound healing: a cellular perspective. Physiol Rev 99:665. https://doi.org/10.1152/PHYSREV.00067.201710.1152/PHYSREV.00067.2017 ↗
2. Mohania D, Chandel S, Kumar P et al (2017) Ultraviolet radiations: skin defense-damage mechanism. Adv Exp Med Biol 996:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_7/FIGURES/410.1007/978-3-319-56017-5_7/FIGURES/4 ↗
3. Weledji EP (2017) Perspectives on wound healing. Austin J Surg 4:1104. https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjsurg.2018.110410.26420/austinjsurg.2018.1104 ↗
4. Guo S, DiPietro LA (2010) Critical review in oral biology & medicine: factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 89:219–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/002203450935912510.1177/0022034509359125 ↗
5. Landén NX, Li D, Ståhle M (2016) Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell Molec Life Sci 73:3861–3885. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00018-016-2268-010.1007/S00018-016-2268-0 ↗
6. Brown BN, Badylak SF (2014) The Role of the host immune response in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. In: Principles of Tissue Engineering: Fourth Edition pp 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00025-210.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00025-2 ↗
7. Chakrabarti SK, Bhattacharya R, Deb KD (2016) Cell-based wound healing : mechanisms and treatments cell-based wound healing: mechanisms and treatments. Br J Med Med Res 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2016/2138210.9734/BJMMR/2016/21382 ↗
8. Borbolla-Jiménez FV, Peña-Corona SI, Farah SJ et al (2023) Films for wound healing fabricated using a solvent casting technique. Pharmaceutics 15:1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS1507191410.3390/PHARMACEUTICS15071914 ↗
9. Sk K, Er B (2014) Wound image analysis classifier for efficient tracking of wound healing status. Signal Image Process 5:15–27. https://doi.org/10.5121/sipij.2014.520210.5121/sipij.2014.5202 ↗
10. Shankar M, Ramesh B, D RK, M NB (2017) Wound healing and it ‘ s importance- a review wound healing and it ‘ s importance—A review10.23880/OAJPR-16000119 ↗
11. Wallace HA, Basehore BM, Zito PM (2023) Wound Healing Phases. StatPearls
12. Deng X, Gould M, Ali MA (2022) A review of current advancements for wound healing: Biomaterial applications and medical devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 110:2542. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.3508610.1002/JBM.B.35086 ↗
13. Rajendran NK, Kumar SSD, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H (2018) A review on nanoparticle based treatment for wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 44:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2018.01.00910.1016/J.JDDST.2018.01.009 ↗
14. Downer M, Berry CE, Parker JB et al (2023) Current Biomaterials for Wound Healing. Bioengineering 10:1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOENGINEERING1012137810.3390/BIOENGINEERING10121378 ↗
15. Esmaeili A, Soleimani M, Rouhani M et al (2024) Xenograft-based skin substitutes: a critical review. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 95:105613. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2024.10561310.1016/J.JDDST.2024.105613 ↗
16. Kolimi P, Narala S, Nyavanandi D et al (2022) Innovative treatment strategies to accelerate wound healing: trajectory and recent advancements. Cells 11:2439. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS1115243910.3390/CELLS11152439 ↗
17. Nourian Dehkordi A, Mirahmadi Babaheydari F, Chehelgerdi M (2019) Raeisi Dehkordi S (2019) Skin tissue engineering: wound healing based on stem-cell-based therapeutic strategies. Stem Cell Res & Therapy 10:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13287-019-1212-210.1186/S13287-019-1212-2 ↗
18. Zhang H, Lin X, Cao X et al (2023) Developing natural polymers for skin wound healing. Bioact Mater 33:355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2023.11.01210.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2023.11.012 ↗
19. Gounden V, Singh M (2024) Hydrogels and wound healing: current and future prospects. Gels 10:43. https://doi.org/10.3390/GELS1001004310.3390/GELS10010043 ↗
20. Ahmed EM (2015) Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 6:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JARE.2013.07.00610.1016/J.JARE.2013.07.006 ↗
21. Xiang J, Shen L, Hong Y (2020) Status and future scope of hydrogels in wound healing: Synthesis, materials and evaluation. Eur Polym J 130:109609. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURPOLYMJ.2020.10960910.1016/J.EURPOLYMJ.2020.109609 ↗
22. Fan F, Saha S, Hanjaya-Putra D (2021) Biomimetic Hydrogels to Promote Wound Healing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9:718377. https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2021.718377/BIBTEX10.3389/FBIOE.2021.718377/BIBTEX ↗
23. Firlar I, Altunbek M, McCarthy C et al (2022) Functional hydrogels for treatment of chronic wounds. Gels 8:127. https://doi.org/10.3390/GELS802012710.3390/GELS8020127 ↗
24. Abd-ElSalam HAH, Refaeey OA, Waked KG et al (2024) A review exploring the wound-healing activity of self-healing hydrogels: fabrication, characterization, mechanism, and biomedical applications. J Clust Sci 35:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10876-024-02638-5/FIGURES/310.1007/S10876-024-02638-5/FIGURES/3 ↗
25. Prasad A, Sankar MR, Katiyar V (2017) State of art on solvent casting particulate leaching method for orthopedic scaffoldsfabrication. Mater Today Proc 4:898–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2017.01.10110.1016/J.MATPR.2017.01.101 ↗
26. Demaggio GB, Frieze WE, Gidley DW et al (1997) Interface and surface effects on the glass transition in thin polystyrene films. Phys Rev Lett 78(8):152410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1524 ↗
27. Sahu N, Parija B, Panigrahi S (2009) Fundamental understanding and modeling of spin coating process: a review. Indian J Phys 83:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12648-009-0009-Z/METRICS10.1007/S12648-009-0009-Z/METRICS ↗
28. Karki S, Kim H, Na SJ et al (2016) Thin films as an emerging platform for drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci 11:559–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJPS.2016.05.00410.1016/J.AJPS.2016.05.004 ↗
29. Deng L, Kang X, Liu Y et al (2018) Characterization of gelatin/zein films fabricated by electrospinning vs solvent casting. Food Hydrocoll 74:324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2017.08.02310.1016/J.FOODHYD.2017.08.023 ↗
30. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT142110.1038/NMAT1421 ↗
31. Loh QL, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 19:485. https://doi.org/10.1089/TEN.TEB.2012.043710.1089/TEN.TEB.2012.0437 ↗
32. Savencu I, Iurian S, Porfire A et al (2021) Review of advances in polymeric wound dressing films. React Funct Polym 168:105059. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.REACTFUNCTPOLYM.2021.10505910.1016/J.REACTFUNCTPOLYM.2021.105059 ↗
33. Aramwit P, Ratanavaraporn J, Ekgasit S et al (2015) A green salt-leaching technique to produce sericin/PVA/glycerin scaffolds with distinguished characteristics for wound-dressing applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103:915–924. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.3326410.1002/JBM.B.33264 ↗
34. Nam YS, Yoon J, Park G (2000) A novel fabrication method of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds using gas foaming salt as a porogen additive. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:110.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1 ↗
35. Mooney DJ, Baldwin DF, Suh NP et al (1996) Novel approach to fabricate porous sponges of poly(d, l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) without the use of organic solvents. Biomaterials 17:1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)87284-X10.1016/0142-9612(96)87284-X ↗
36. Costantini M, Barbetta A (2018) Gas foaming technologies for 3D scaffold engineering. Functional 3D tissue engineering scaffolds: materials, technologies, and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100979-6.00006-910.1016/B978-0-08-100979-6.00006-9 ↗
37. Suamte L, Tirkey A, Barman J, Jayasekhar Babu P (2023) Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Smart Mater Manuf 1:100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SMMF.2022.10001110.1016/J.SMMF.2022.100011 ↗
38. Mikos AG, Temenoff JS (2000) Formation of highly porous biodegradable scaffolds for tissue engineering. EJB Electr J Biotechnol 3:717–3458
39. O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L (2004) Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 25:1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-610.1016/S0142-9612(03)00630-6 ↗
40. Garcia-Amezquita LE, Welti-Chanes J, Vergara-Balderas FT, Bermúdez-Aguirre D (2016) Freeze-drying: The Basic Process. In: Encyclopedia of Food and Health pp 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00328-710.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00328-7 ↗
41. Aram E, Mehdipour-Ataei S (2016) A review on the micro- and nanoporous polymeric foams: Preparation and properties. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater 65:358–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2015.112994810.1080/00914037.2015.1129948 ↗
42. Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M et al (2017) Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 78:1246–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2017.05.01710.1016/J.MSEC.2017.05.017 ↗
43. Abdelaziz AG, Nageh H, Abdo SM et al (2023) A review of 3D polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: principles, fabrication techniques, immunomodulatory roles, and challenges. Bioengineering 10:204. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOENGINEERING1002020410.3390/BIOENGINEERING10020204 ↗
44. Chung JJ, Im H, Kim SH et al (2020) Toward biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering: 3D printing techniques in regenerative medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:586406. https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2020.586406/BIBTEX10.3389/FBIOE.2020.586406/BIBTEX ↗
45. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A et al (2020) Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering. Biomaterials 226:119536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2019.11953610.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2019.119536 ↗
46. Lima TDP, Canelas CADA, Concha VO et al (2022) 3D bioprinting technology and hydrogels used in the Process. J Funct Biomater 13:214. https://doi.org/10.3390/JFB1304021410.3390/JFB13040214 ↗
47. Liu M, Duan XP, Li YM et al (2017) Electrospun nanofibers for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng, C 76:1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2017.03.03410.1016/J.MSEC.2017.03.034 ↗
48. Baniasadi M, Huang J, Xu Z et al (2015) High-performance coils and yarns of polymeric piezoelectric nanofibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:5358–536610.1021/am508812a ↗
49. Amna R, Ali K, Malik MI, Shamsah SI (2020) A brief review of electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: history and main applications. J New Mater Electrochem Syst 23:151–163. https://doi.org/10.14447/JNMES.V23I3.A01r10.14447/JNMES.V23I3.A01r ↗
50. Mowafi S, El-Sayed H (2023) Production and Utilization of Keratin and Sericin-Based Electro-Spun Nanofibers: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Natural Fibers 20:2192544. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2023.219254410.1080/15440478.2023.2192544 ↗
51. El-Sayed H, Vineis C, Varesano A et al (2019) A critique on multi-jet electrospinning: state of the art and future outlook. Nanotechnol Rev 8:236–24510.1515/ntrev-2019-0022 ↗
52. Samy M, Ekram B, Abd El-Hady BM, Ayoub MMH (2024) In vitro release study of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofiber mats loaded with 5-fluorouracil. Polym Bull 81:3953–3972. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-023-04930-2/TABLES/310.1007/S00289-023-04930-2/TABLES/3 ↗
53. Ekram B, Abdel-Hady BM, El-Kady AM et al (2017) Optimum parameters for the production of nano-scale electrospun polycaprolactone to be used as a biomedical material. Adv Nat Sci: Nanosci Nanotech 8:045018. https://doi.org/10.1088/2043-6254/aa92b410.1088/2043-6254/aa92b4 ↗
54. Venmathi Maran BA, Jeyachandran S, Kimura M (2024) A review on the electrospinning of polymer nanofibers and its biomedical applications. J Compos Scince 32(8):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/JCS801003210.3390/JCS8010032 ↗
55. Liu X, Xu H, Zhang M, Yu DG (2021) Electrospun medicated nanofibers for wound healing: review. Membranes (Basel) 11:770. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEMBRANES1110077010.3390/MEMBRANES11100770 ↗
56. Zare M, Dziemidowicz K, Williams GR, Ramakrishna S (2021) Encapsulation of pharmaceutical and nutraceutical active ingredients using electrospinning processes. Nanomaterials 11:1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO1108196810.3390/NANO11081968 ↗
57. Ekram B, Trueman RP, Phillips JB et al (2024) Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride with novel facile synthesized functionalized boron nitride quantum dots for neural applications. Polym Eng Sci 64:1534–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/PEN.2663210.1002/PEN.26632 ↗
58. Khodadadi M, Alijani S, Montazeri M et al (2020) Recent advances in electrospun nanofiber-mediated drug delivery strategies for localized cancer chemotherapy. J Biomed Mater Res A 108:1444–1458. https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.A.3691210.1002/JBM.A.36912 ↗
59. Tranquilli Leali P, Merolli A (2009) Fundamentals of biomaterials. Biomater Hand Surg 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1195-3_110.1007/978-88-470-1195-3_1 ↗
60. Morhardt DR, Mauney JR, Estrada CR (2019) Role of biomaterials in surgery. Encycl Tissue Eng Regen Med: Vol 1–3(1–3):315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.65845-210.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.65845-2 ↗
61. Biomaterials: Basic principles
62. Qureshi D, Nayak SK, Anis A, et al (2020) Introduction of biopolymers: Food and biomedical applications. In: Biopolymer-Based Formulations: Biomedical and Food Applications pp 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816897-4.00001-110.1016/B978-0-12-816897-4.00001-1 ↗
63. Ghalia MA, Dahman Y (2017) Biodegradable poly(lactic acid)-based scaffolds: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Polym Res 24:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10965-017-1227-2/METRICS10.1007/S10965-017-1227-2/METRICS ↗
64. Reddy MSB, Ponnamma D, Choudhary R, Sadasivuni KK (2021) A comparative review of natural and synthetic biopolymer composite scaffolds. Polymers (Basel) 13:1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1307110510.3390/POLYM13071105 ↗
65. Ekram B, Abd El-Hady BM, El-Kady AM et al (2019) Enhancing the stability, hydrophilicity, mechanical and biological properties of electrospun polycaprolactone in formic acid/acetic acid solvent system. Fibers Polym 20:715–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-8795-110.1007/s12221-019-8795-1 ↗
66. Jones JR (2005) Scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials artificial organs and tissue engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845690861.4.20110.1533/9781845690861.4.201 ↗
67. Kim S, Uroz M, Bays JL, Chen CS (2021) Harnessing mechanobiology for tissue engineering. Dev Cell 56:180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DEVCEL.2020.12.01710.1016/J.DEVCEL.2020.12.017 ↗
68. Tripathy N, Perumal E, Ahmad R, et al (2019) Hybrid composite biomaterials. In: Principles of regenerative medicine pp 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809880-6.00040-010.1016/B978-0-12-809880-6.00040-0 ↗
69. Wei S, Ma JX, Xu L et al (2020) Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Mil Med Res 7:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40779-020-00280-610.1186/S40779-020-00280-6 ↗
70. Song R, Murphy M, Li C et al (2018) Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des Devel Ther 12:3117–3145. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S16544010.2147/DDDT.S165440 ↗
71. Yadav P, Beniwal G, Saxena KK (2021) A review on pore and porosity in tissue engineering. Mater Today Proc 44:2623–2628. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.12.66110.1016/J.MATPR.2020.12.661 ↗
72. Strassburg S, Mayer K, Scheibel T (2022) Functionalization of biopolymer fibers with magnetic nanoparticles. Phys Sci Rev 7:1091–1117
73. Lavania S, Mehta J, Bhardwaj P et al (2023) Biocomposites: prospects and manifold applications for human and environmental sustainability. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 12:037002. https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ACBE1710.1149/2162-8777/ACBE17 ↗
74. Gheorghita R, Anchidin-Norocel L, Filip R et al (2021) Applications of Biopolymers for drugs and probiotics delivery. Polymers (Basel) 13:2729. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1316272910.3390/POLYM13162729 ↗
75. Dattilo M, Patitucci F, Prete S et al (2023) Polysaccharide-based hydrogels and their application as drug delivery systems in cancer treatment: a review. J Funct Biomater 14:5510.3390/jfb14020055 ↗
76. Wilk S, Benko A (2021) Advances in fabricating the electrospun biopolymer-based biomaterials. J Funct Biomater 12:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/JFB1202002610.3390/JFB12020026 ↗
77. Mehta J, Gupta K, Lavania S et al (2024) Inherent roadmap in synthesis and applications of sustainable materials using oil based and microbial polymers. Mater Today Sustain 25:100615. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTSUST.2023.10061510.1016/J.MTSUST.2023.100615 ↗
78. Walle C Van Der (2011) Peptide and protein delivery
79. Molnar C, Gair J (2015) 2.3 Biological molecules
80. Choi JH, Kim DK, Song JE et al (2018) Silk fibroin-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Adv Exp Med Biol 1077:371–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_2010.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_20 ↗
81. Chouhan D, Mandal BB (2020) Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to bedside. Acta Biomater 103:24–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2019.11.05010.1016/J.ACTBIO.2019.11.050 ↗
82. Arumugam M, Murugesan B, Chinnalagu D, Mahalingam S (2024) Dual therapeutic approach: Biodegradable nanofiber scaffolds of silk fibroin and collagen combined with silver and gold nanoparticles for enhanced bacterial infections treatment and accelerated wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 95:105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.10562010.1016/j.jddst.2024.105620 ↗
83. Wang SL, Li XW, Xu W et al (2024) Advances of regenerated and functionalized silk biomaterials and application in skin wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 254:128024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12802410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128024 ↗
84. Radulescu DM, Andronescu E, Vasile OR et al (2024) Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for wound healing applications with metal oxide nanoparticles. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 96:105689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.10568910.1016/j.jddst.2024.105689 ↗
85. Yang M, Yu S, Zhao P et al (2022) Fabrication of homogeneously-aligned nano-fillers encapsulated silk fibroin electrospun nanofibers for improved fibroblast attachment, epithelialization, and collagen depositions: in vitro and in vivo wound healing evaluation. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 33:878–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2021.202436010.1080/09205063.2021.2024360 ↗
86. Khan AurR, Huang K, Jinzhong Z et al (2021) Exploration of the antibacterial and wound healing potential of a PLGA/silk fibroin based electrospun membrane loaded with zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B 9:1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02822c10.1039/d0tb02822c ↗
87. Chomachayi MD, Solouk A, Mirzadeh H (2016) Electrospun silk-based nanofibrous scaffolds: fiber diameter and oxygen transfer. Prog Biomater 5:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0046-610.1007/s40204-016-0046-6 ↗
88. Gajbhiye S, Wairkar S (2022) Collagen fabricated delivery systems for wound healing: a new roadmap. Biomater Adv 142:213152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOADV.2022.21315210.1016/J.BIOADV.2022.213152 ↗
89. El Masry MS, Chaffee S, Das GP et al (2019) Stabilized collagen matrix dressing improves wound macrophage function and epithelialization. FASEB J 33:2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1096/FJ.201800352R10.1096/FJ.201800352R ↗
90. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li Y et al (2023) Application of collagen-based hydrogel in skin wound healing. Gels 9:18510.3390/gels9030185 ↗
91. Castellano M, Dodero A, Scarfi S et al (2023) Chitosan-collagen electrospun nanofibers loaded with curcumin as wound-healing patches. Polymers (Basel) 15:2931. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1513293110.3390/polym15132931 ↗
92. Dong Z, Liu Q, Han X et al (2023) Electrospun nanofibrous membranes of recombinant human collagen type III promote cutaneous wound healing. J Mater Chem B 11:6346–6360. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tb00438d10.1039/d3tb00438d ↗
93. Zhou T, Wang N, Xue Y et al (2016) Electrospun tilapia collagen nanofibers accelerating wound healing via inducing keratinocytes proliferation and differentiation. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 143:415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.05210.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.052 ↗
94. Ndlovu SP, Ngece K, Alven S, Aderibigbe BA (2021) Gelatin-based hybrid scaffolds: promising wound dressings. Polymers (Basel) 13:2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1317295910.3390/POLYM13172959 ↗
95. Wiwatwongwana F, Surin P (2019) In vitro degradation of gelatin/carboxymethylcellulose scaffolds for skin tissue regeneration. Chem Eng Trans 74:1555–1560. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET197426010.3303/CET1974260 ↗
96. Gulsun T, Inal M, Akdag Y et al (2022) The development and characterization of electrospun gelatin nanofibers containing indomethacin and curcumin for accelerated wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 67:103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2021.10300010.1016/J.JDDST.2021.103000 ↗
97. Nagiah N, Madhavi L, Anitha R et al (2013) Electrospinning of poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) and gelatin blended thin films: Fabrication, characterization, and application in skin regeneration. Polym Bull 70:2337–2358. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00289-013-0956-6/FIGURES/1210.1007/S00289-013-0956-6/FIGURES/12 ↗
98. Borges-Vilches J, Unalan I, Fernández K, Boccaccini AR (2022) Fabrication of biocompatible electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibers loaded with pinus radiata bark extracts for wound healing applications. Polymers (Basel) 14:2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM1412233110.3390/POLYM14122331 ↗
99. Vineis C, Cruz Maya I, Mowafi S et al (2021) Synergistic effect of sericin and keratin in gelatin based nanofibers for in vitro applications. Int J Biol Macromol 190:375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2021.09.00710.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2021.09.007 ↗
100. Laurens N, Koolwijk P, de Maat MP (2006) Fibrin structure and wound healing. J Thromb Haemost 4:932–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1538-7836.2006.01861.X10.1111/J.1538-7836.2006.01861.X ↗