DataVXJournal of Materials SciencePaper
journal article·2025-02

Seawater-mixed alkali-activated materials: a state-of-the-art review

Weisen Liu, Jinxia Zhao, Yuan Feng, Baifa Zhang, Jianhe Xie

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 60· Issue 5
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang Z, Zhan X, Zhu H, Zhang B, Li R, Dong Z, Kua HW (2024) Eco-sustainable design of seawater sea-sand slag-based geopolymer mortars incorporating ternary solid waste. Constr Build Mater 431:136512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13651210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136512 ↗
2. Feng Y, Xue Z, Zhong H, Zhang B, Yang J, Xie J (2024) Improving geopolymer concrete performance with hazardous solid waste phosphogypsum. J Build Eng 95:110333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.11033310.1016/j.jobe.2024.110333 ↗
3. Feng Y, Xue Z, Zhang B, Xie J, Chen C, Tan J, Zhao C (2023) Effects of phosphogypsum substitution on the performance of ground granulated blast furnace slag/fly ash-based alkali-activated binders. J Build Eng 70:106387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10638710.1016/j.jobe.2023.106387 ↗
4. Luukkonen T, Abdollahnejad Z, Yliniemi J, Kinnunen P, Illikainen M (2018) One-part alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Res 103:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001 ↗
5. Adediran A, Yliniemi J, Carvelli V, Adesanya E, Illikainen M (2022) Durability of alkali-activated Fe-rich fayalite slag-based mortars subjected to different environmental conditions. Cem Concr Res 162:106984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10698410.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106984 ↗
6. Ouda AS, Gharieb M (2021) Behavior of alkali-activated pozzocrete-fly ash paste modified with ceramic tile waste against elevated temperatures and seawater attacks. Constr Build Mater 285:122866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12286610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122866 ↗
7. Wang Z, Su L, Mai Z, Yang S, Liu M, Li J, Xie J (2024) Bond durability between geopolymer-based CFRP composite and OPC concrete substrate in seawater environments. J Build Eng 93:109817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10981710.1016/j.jobe.2024.109817 ↗
8. Kumar R, Verma M, Dev N (2021) Investigation on the effect of seawater condition, sulphate attack, acid attack, freeze-thaw condition, and wetting-drying on the geopolymer concrete. Ijst-T Civ Eng 46:2823–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00767-910.1007/s40996-021-00767-9 ↗
9. Kwasny J, Aiken TA, Soutsos MN, McIntosh JA, Cleland DJ (2018) Sulfate and acid resistance of lithomarge-based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater 166:537–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.12910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.129 ↗
10. Babaee M, Castel A (2018) Chloride diffusivity, chloride threshold, and corrosion initiation in reinforced alkali-activated mortars: role of calcium, alkali, and silicate content. Cem Concr Res 111:56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.009 ↗
11. Chen Y, Shui Z, Chen W, Chen G (2015) Chloride binding of synthetic Ca–Al–NO3 LDHs in hardened cement paste. Constr Build Mater 93:1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.047 ↗
12. Salas DA, Ramirez AD, Ulloa N, Baykara H, Boero AJ (2018) Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 190:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.12310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.123 ↗
13. Nikookar M, Brake NA, Adesina M, Rahman A, Selvaratnam T (2023) Past, current, and future re-use of recycled non-potable water sources in concrete applications to reduce freshwater consumption—a review. Cleaner Mater 9:100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2023.10020310.1016/j.clema.2023.100203 ↗
14. Azeem A, Ahmad S, Hanif A (2023) Wastewater utilization for concrete production: prospects, challenges, and opportunities. J Build Eng 80:108078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10807810.1016/j.jobe.2023.108078 ↗
15. He C, Liu Z, Wu J, Pan X, Fang Z, Li J, Bryan BA (2021) Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat Commun 12:4667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25026-310.1038/s41467-021-25026-3 ↗
16. Li P, Li W, Yu T, Qu F, Tam VWY (2020) Investigation on early-age hydration, mechanical properties and microstructure of seawater sea sand cement mortar. Constr Build Mater 249:118776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11877610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118776 ↗
17. Zhou A, Chen J, Li K, Liu T, Lu J-X, Zou D, Li Y (2024) Developing green and economical low-alkalinity seawater sea sand concrete via innovative processing underground sediment. J Cleaner Prod 443:140927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14092710.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140927 ↗
18. Alawad SM, Mansour RB, Al-Sulaiman FA, Rehman S (2023) Renewable energy systems for water desalination applications: a comprehensive review. Energ Convers Manage 286:117035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.11703510.1016/j.enconman.2023.117035 ↗
19. Lv W, Sun Z, Su Z (2020) Study of seawater mixed one-part alkali activated GGBFS-fly ash. Cem Concr Compos 106:103484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.10348410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103484 ↗
20. Jun Y, Bae YH, Shin TY, Kim JH, Yim HJ (2020) Alkali-activated slag paste with different mixing water: a comparison study of early-age paste using electrical resistivity. Materials 13:2447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1311244710.3390/ma13112447 ↗
21. Li Y-L, Zhao X-L, Singh Raman RK, Al-Saadi S (2018) Thermal and mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag paste, mortar and concrete utilising seawater and sea sand. Constr Build Mater 159:704–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.10410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.104 ↗
22. Yang Z, Zhan X, Zhu H, Zhang B, Feng P, Li H, Kua HW (2023) Performance-based alkali-activated seawater sea-sand concrete: mixture optimization for mechanical, environmental, and economical objectives. Constr Build Mater 409:134156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13415610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134156 ↗
23. Zhang B, Huang D, Li L, Lin M, Liu Y, Fang W, Lu J, Liu F, Li Y, Liu Y, Xiong Z (2022) Effect of magnesium salt contamination on the microstructures and properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer: the role of MgCl2 and MgSO4. J Mater Sci Technol 20:4500–4514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.01910.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.019 ↗
24. Do QM, Bui TH, Nguyen HT (2019) Effects of seawater content in alkaline activators to engineering properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Solid State Phenom 296:105–111. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.296.10510.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.296.105 ↗
25. Ebead U, Lau D, Lollini F, Nanni A, Suraneni P, Yu T (2022) A review of recent advances in the science and technology of seawater-mixed concrete. Cem Concr Res 152:106666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.10666610.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106666 ↗
26. Ouda AS, Gharieb M (2022) Evaluating the role of feldspar on the resistivity of alkali-activated slag towards seawater attack. Environ Sci Pollut R 30:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22217-310.1007/s11356-022-22217-3 ↗
27. Siddique S, Jang JG (2021) Acid and sulfate resistance of seawater based alkali activated fly ash: a sustainable and durable approach. Constr Build Mater 281:122601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12260110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122601 ↗
28. Rashad AM (2020) Performance of autoclaved alkali-activated metakaolin pastes blended with micro-size particles derivative from dehydroxylation of kaolinite. Constr Build Mater 248:118671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11867110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118671 ↗
29. Li Z, Xiong Z, Zhang B, Huang D, Huang J, Yan L, Li L (2023) Seawater used to metakaolinite-based geopolymer preparation. Constr Build Mater 392:131816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13181610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131816 ↗
30. Boonjaeng S, Chindaprasirt P, Pimraksa K (2014) Lime-calcined clay materials with alkaline activation: phase development and reaction transition zone. Appl Clay Sci 95:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.05.00210.1016/j.clay.2014.05.002 ↗
31. Ashraf W, Borno IB, Khan RI, Siddique S, Haque MI, Tahsin A (2022) Mimicking the cementation mechanism of ancient Roman seawater concrete using calcined clays. Appl Clay Sci 230:106696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2022.10669610.1016/j.clay.2022.106696 ↗
32. Rashad AM, Khalil MH (2022) An investigation of using seawater as mixing water for alkali-activated slag pastes. Innov Infrastruct Solut 7:152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00755-610.1007/s41062-022-00755-6 ↗
33. Jun Y, Kim T, Kim JH (2020) Chloride-bearing characteristics of alkali-activated slag mixed with seawater: effect of different salinity levels. Cem Concr Compos 112:103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10368010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103680 ↗
34. Mohammed TU, Hamada H, Yamaji T (2004) Performance of seawater-mixed concrete in the tidal environment. Cem Concr Res 34:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.020 ↗
35. Kim MS, Jun Y, Lee C, Oh JE (2013) Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem Concr Res 54:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2013.09.011 ↗
36. Tong L, Zhao J, Cheng Z (2021) Chloride ion binding effect and corrosion resistance of geopolymer materials prepared with seawater and coral sand. Constr Build Mater 309:125126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12512610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125126 ↗
37. Liu X, Nair S, Aughenbaugh K, van Oort E (2019) Mud-to-cement conversion of non-aqueous drilling fluids using alkali-activated fly ash. J Petrol Sci Eng 182:106242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10624210.1016/j.petrol.2019.106242 ↗
38. Luukkonen T, Yliniemi J, Kinnunen P, Illikainen M (2020) Sustainable batching water options for one-part alkali-activated slag mortar: Sea water and reverse osmosis reject water. PLoS ONE 15:e0242462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.024246210.1371/journal.pone.0242462 ↗
39. Shi D, Yao Y, Ye J, Zhang W (2019) Effects of seawater on mechanical properties, mineralogy and microstructure of calcium silicate slag-based alkali-activated materials. Constr Build Mater 212:569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.28810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.288 ↗
40. Reddy KC, Kim GM, Park S (2022) Modeling the phase evolution in alkali-activated slag cements upon interaction with seawater. Case Stud Constr Mat 17:e01476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0147610.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01476 ↗
41. Padmapriya M, Ramesh ST, Biju VM (2022) Synthesis of seawater based geopolymer: characterization and adsorption capacity of methylene blue from wastewater. Mater Today: Proc 51:1770–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.03010.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.030 ↗
42. Behfarnia K, Rostami M (2017) The Effect of alkaline solution-to-slag ratio on permeability of alkali activated slag concrete. Int J Civ Eng 16:897–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0234-310.1007/s40999-017-0234-3 ↗
43. Aguirre-Guerrero AM, Robayo-Salazar RA, de Gutiérrez RM (2017) A novel geopolymer application: Coatings to protect reinforced concrete against corrosion. Appl Clay Sci 135:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.10.02910.1016/j.clay.2016.10.029 ↗
44. Bhardwaj P, Gupta R, Mishra D, Sanghi SK, Verma S, Amritphale SS (2019) Corrosion and fire protective behavior of advanced phosphatic geopolymeric coating on mild steel substrate. Silicon-Neth 12:487–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-019-00153-110.1007/s12633-019-00153-1 ↗
45. Mu S, Liu J, Liu J, Wang Y, Shi L, Jiang Q (2018) Property and microstructure of waterborne self-setting geopolymer coating: optimization effect of SiO2/Na2O molar ratio. Minerals-Basel 8:162. https://doi.org/10.3390/min804016210.3390/min8040162 ↗
46. Li F, Zhang B, Zhu H, Wang Q, Ji J (2022) Axial compressive behavior of GFRP-confined seawater coral aggregate concrete incorporating slag-based alkali-activated materials. Constr Build Mater 347:128437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12843710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128437 ↗
47. Yu X, Shi J, He Z, Yalçınkaya Ç, Revilla-Cuesta V, Gencel O (2023) Review of the materials composition and performance evolution of green alkali-activated cementitious materials. Clean Technol Environ Policy 25:1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02478-310.1007/s10098-023-02478-3 ↗
48. Yang G, Zhao J, Wang Y (2022) Durability properties of sustainable alkali-activated cementitious materials as marine engineering material: a review. Mater Today Sustain 17:100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2021.10009910.1016/j.mtsust.2021.100099 ↗
49. Li H, Zhang Z, Deng Y, Xu F, Hu J, Zhu D, Yu Q, Shi C (2024) Geopolymer composites for marine application: structural properties and durability. Cem Concr Compos 152:105647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.10564710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2024.105647 ↗
50. Xiao Y, Sun W, Tan Y, Sun DA, Xing D, Wang D (2024) Enhancement of phosphogypsum-based solid waste cementitious materials via seawater and metakaolin synergy: strength, microstructure, and environmental benefits. Sustain Mater Technol 41:e01029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e0102910.1016/j.susmat.2024.e01029 ↗
51. Rashad AM, Ezzat M (2019) A Preliminary study on the use of magnetic, Zamzam, and sea water as mixing water for alkali-activated slag pastes. Constr Build Mater 207:672–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.162 ↗
52. Provis JL (2018) Alkali-activated materials. Cem Concr Res 114:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2017.02.009 ↗
53. Guo S, Wu Y, Jia Z, Qi X, Wang W (2023) Sodium-based activators in alkali-activated materials: classification and comparison. J Build Eng 70:106397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10639710.1016/j.jobe.2023.106397 ↗
54. Harmaji A (2022) Seawater as alkali activator in fly ash based geopolymer. Math Struct Comp 4:45–49. https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v4i2.832210.21512/emacsjournal.v4i2.8322 ↗
55. Yang S, Xu J, Zang C, Li R, Yang Q, Sun S (2019) Mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag concrete mixed by seawater and sea sand. Constr Build Mater 196:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.11310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.113 ↗
56. Zhang SS, Wang S, Chen X (2024) Understanding the role of magnesium ions on setting of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Cem Concr Res 177:107430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.10743010.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107430 ↗
57. Brew DRM, Glasser FP (2005) Synthesis and characterisation of magnesium silicate hydrate gels. Cem Concr Res 35:85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.02210.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.022 ↗
58. Zhang T, Cheeseman CR, Vandeperre LJ (2011) Development of low pH cement systems forming magnesium silicate hydrate (M–S–H). Cem Concr Res 41:439–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.01610.1016/j.cemconres.2011.01.016 ↗
59. Zhang T, Vandeperre LJ, Cheeseman CR (2014) Formation of magnesium silicate hydrate (M–S–H) cement pastes using sodium hexametaphosphate. Cem Concr Res 65:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2014.07.001 ↗
60. Ren J, Sun H, Cao K, Ren Z, Zhou B, Wu W, Xing F (2021) Effects of natural seawater mixing on the properties of alkali-activated slag binders. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12360110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123601 ↗
61. Kuang L, Li G, Xiang J, Ma W, Cui X (2023) Effect of seawater on the properties and microstructure of metakaolin/slag-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 397:132418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13241810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132418 ↗
62. Jun Y, Kim JH, Han SH, Kim T (2021) Influence of seawater on alkali-activated slag concrete. Mater Struct 54:121. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01719-510.1617/s11527-021-01719-5 ↗
63. Siddique S, Jang JG (2020) Mechanical properties, microstructure, and chloride content of alkali-activated fly ash paste made with sea water. Materials 309:125177. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1306146710.3390/ma13061467 ↗
64. Materials, A.S.F.T. (2013) Standard practice for the preparation of substitute ocean water.
65. Lyu X, Robinson N, Elchalakani M, Johns ML, Dong M, Nie S (2022) Sea sand seawater geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10414110.1016/j.jobe.2022.104141 ↗
66. Zhang BZH, Shah KW, Dong Z, Wu J (2020) Performance evaluation and microstructure characterization of seawater and coral/sea sand alkali-activated mortars. Constr Build Mater 259:120403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12040310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120403 ↗
67. Phair JW, Van Deventer JSJ (2002) Effect of the silicate activator pH on the microstructural characteristics of waste-based geopolymers. Int J Mineral Proc 66(1–4):121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-7516(02)00013-310.1016/S0301-7516(02)00013-3 ↗
68. Lao J-C, Huang B-T, Xu L-Y, Khan M, Fang Y, Dai J-G (2023) Seawater sea-sand engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) with high strength and high ductility. Cem Concr Compos 138:104998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.10499810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104998 ↗
69. Borno IB, Haque MI, Ashraf W (2023) Crystallization of C–S–H and C–A–S–H in artificial seawater at ambient temperature. Cem Concr Res 173:107292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.10729210.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107292 ↗
70. Ren J, Sun H, Li Q, Li Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Li L, Xing F (2022) A comparison between alkali-activated slag/fly ash binders prepared with natural seawater and deionized water. J Am Ceram Soc 105:5929–5943. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.1851510.1111/jace.18515 ↗
71. Jun Y, Yoon S, Oh J (2017) A comparison study for chloride-binding capacity between alkali-activated fly ash and slag in the use of seawater. Appl Sci 7:971. https://doi.org/10.3390/app710097110.3390/app7100971 ↗
72. Zhang B, Zhu H, Shah KW, Feng P, Dong Z (2021) Optimization of mix proportion of alkali-activated slag mortars prepared with seawater and coral sand. Constr Build Mater 284:122805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12280510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122805 ↗
73. Kishar EA, Ahmed DA, Mohammed MR, Noury R (2013) Effect of calcium chloride on the hydration characteristics of ground clay bricks cement pastes. Beni-Suef U J Basic 2:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2013.09.00310.1016/j.bjbas.2013.09.003 ↗
74. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, Felippe WT, Tanomaru Filho M, Esberard RM (2009) The influence of calcium chloride on the setting time, solubility, disintegration, and pH of mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cement with a radiopacifier. J Endodont 35:550–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.01810.1016/j.joen.2008.12.018 ↗
75. Younis A, Ebead U, Suraneni P, Nanni A (2018) Fresh and hardened properties of seawater-mixed concrete. Constr Build Mater 190:276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.12610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.126 ↗
76. Zhao J, Long B, Yang G, Cheng Z, Liu Q (2022) Characteristics of alkali-activated slag powder mixing with seawater: workability, hydration reaction kinetics and mechanism. Case Stud Constr Mat 17:e01381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0138110.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01381 ↗
77. Liu J, Zhao J, Zhao Y, Wu K, Yang G (2024) Influence of waste coral powder on the properties of alkali-activated slag cement prepared with seawater. J Mater Civ Eng 36:04024177. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1776110.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17761 ↗
78. Wang J, Huang T, Cheng G, Liu Z, Li S, Wang D (2019) Effects of fly ash on the properties and microstructure of alkali-activated FA/BFS repairing mortar. Fuel 256:115919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.11591910.1016/j.fuel.2019.115919 ↗
79. Cheung J, Jeknavorian A, Roberts L, Silva D (2011) Impact of admixtures on the hydration kinetics of Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 41:1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.005 ↗
80. Ghorab HY, Hilal MS, Antar A (1990) Effect of mixing and curing waters on the behaviour of cement pastes and concrete Part 2: properties of cement paste and concrete. Cem Concr Res 20:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(90)90117-G10.1016/0008-8846(90)90117-G ↗
81. Brough AR, Holloway M, Sykes J, Atkinson A (2000) Sodium silicate-based alkali-activated slag mortars: Part II. The retarding effect of additions of sodium chloride or malic acid. Cem Concr Res 30(9):1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00356-210.1016/S0008-8846(00)00356-2 ↗
82. Younis A, Ebead U, Suraneni P, Nanni A (2020) Performance of seawater-mixed recycled-aggregate concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 32:04019331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000299910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002999 ↗
83. Nishida T, Otsuki N, Ohara H, Garba-Say ZM, Nagata T (2015) Some considerations for applicability of seawater as mixing water in concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 27:B4014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000100610.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001006 ↗
84. Li H, Farzadnia N, Shi C (2018) The role of seawater in interaction of slag and silica fume with cement in low water-to-binder ratio pastes at the early age of hydration. Constr Build Mater 185:508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.091 ↗
85. Scanferla P, Finocchiaro C, Gharzouni A, Barone G, Mazzoleni P, Rossignol S (2023) High temperature behavior of sodium and potassium volcanic ashes-based alkali-activated materials (Mt. Etna, Italy). Constr Build Mater 408:133702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13370210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133702 ↗
86. Tanaka M, Takahashi K (2007) Study on the salting-out effect using silica species by FAB-MS. J Solution Chem 36:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-006-9101-610.1007/s10953-006-9101-6 ↗
87. Tanaka M, Takahashi K (2005) Characterization of silicate complexes in aqueous sodium sulfate solutions by FAB-MS. J Solution Chem 34:617–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-005-4488-z10.1007/s10953-005-4488-z ↗
88. Wang Y, Zhang C, Wang J, Xu Y, Jin F, Wang Y, Yan Q, Liu T, Gan X, Xiong Z (2019) Experimental study on foci development in mortar using seawater and sand. Materials 12:1799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1211179910.3390/ma12111799 ↗
89. Wang J, Xie J, Wang Y, Liu Y, Ding Y (2020) Rheological properties, compressive strength, hydration products and microstructure of seawater-mixed cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos 114:103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10377010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103770 ↗
90. Zhang B, Zhu H, Wang Q, Shah KW, Wang W (2021) Design and properties of seawater coral aggregate alkali-activated concrete. J Sustain Cem-Based Mater 11:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2021.191365910.1080/21650373.2021.1913659 ↗
91. Zhang B, Zhu H, Li F, Dong Z, Zhang P (2021) Compressive stress-strain behavior of seawater coral aggregate concrete incorporating eco-efficient alkali-activated slag materials. Constr Build Mater 299:123886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12388610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123886 ↗
92. Zhang B, Zhu H, Cao R (2021) Mechanical properties and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated seawater coral aggregate concrete. J Sustain Cem-Based Mater 11:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2021.198963310.1080/21650373.2021.1989633 ↗
93. Yahya Z, Abdullah MMAB, Ramli SNH, Minciuna MG, Abd Razak R (2018) Durability of fly ash based geopolymer concrete infilled with rubber crumb in seawater exposure. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 374:012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/374/1/01206910.1088/1757-899x/374/1/012069 ↗
94. He J, Hu T, He J, Song X, Wu Y, Sang G (2021) Using the negative hydration of inorganic salt ions to improve the properties of Alkali-activated slag cement in plastic stage. Constr Build Mater 308:124944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12494410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124944 ↗
95. Lu C, Zhang Z, Shi C, Li N, Jiao D, Yuan Q (2021) Rheology of alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Compos 121:104061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10406110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104061 ↗
96. Kashani A, Provis JL, Qiao GG, van Deventer JSJ (2014) The interrelationship between surface chemistry and rheology in alkali activated slag paste. Constr Build Mater 65:583–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.127 ↗
97. Zhang B, Zhu H, Lu F (2021) Fracture properties of slag-based alkali-activated seawater coral aggregate concrete. Theor Appl Fract Mech 115:103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10307110.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103071 ↗
98. Yang S, Li L, Sun Z, Wang J, Guo Q, Yang Y (2021) A closed-form fracture model to predict tensile strength and fracture toughness of alkali-activated slag and fly ash blended concrete made by sea sand and recycled coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater 300:123976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12397610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123976 ↗
99. Falah MW (2010) Effect of seawater for mixing and curing on structural concrete, IES journal Part A: civil and structural. Eng-Prc 3:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2010.52104810.1080/19373260.2010.521048 ↗
100. Thanh TP, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TT (2022) Experimental evaluation of geopolymer concrete strength using sea sand and sea water in mixture. Civil Eng J 8(8):1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-08-0310.28991/CEJ-2022-08-08-03 ↗