journal article·2023-10

Machine learning enabled property prediction of carbon-based electrodes for supercapacitors

Rajat Kushwaha, Mayank K. Singh, Sarathkumar Krishnan, Dhirendra K. Rai

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 58· Issue 39
Publisher page

Abstract

For supercapacitor electrodes, carbon is one of the most sought materials. Many synthetic strategies have been reported for carbon materials with a wide range of features in terms of surface area, porosity, the extent of the disorder, and the presence of various doping elements. Though there are many reports on the independent impact of these properties on supercapacitive outcomes of carbon materials, the collective effect of these features on the supercapacitive behavior is still not well understood. Therefore, it is imperative to explore new methods to predict the supercapacitive performance of carbon material without attempting experimentation. In this regard, this work reports on the comparative efficacy of five machine-learning (ML) techniques for estimating the capacitance of carbon-based supercapacitors, including Linear Regression, Lasso Regression, XGBoost, Random Forest Regressor, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). We gathered data from various research papers and articles to prepare the dataset, followed by Data Cleaning and Feature Selection to select the best parameters for training our Machine Learning model. Additionally, five factors were chosen to determine their effects on capacitance: voltage window, specific surface area (m2/g), pore size (nm), ID/IG ratio, and extent of N-doping. Out of five ML approaches, XGBoost, Random Forest Regressor, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) produced respectable prediction results when tested against actual data. More significantly, this project demonstrates the promise of Machine-Learning in selecting suitable materials for energy storage applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Singh MK, Gupta AK, Krishnan S, Guha N, Marimuthu S, Rai DK (2021) A new hierarchically porous Cu-MOF composited with rGO as an efficient hybrid supercapacitor electrode material. J Energy Storage 43:103301–103313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.10330110.1016/j.est.2021.103301 ↗
2. Krishnan S, Gupta AK, Singh MK, Guha N, Rai DK (2022) Nitrogen-rich Cu-MOF decorated on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for hybrid supercapacitor applications with enhanced cycling stability. Chem Eng J 43:135042–135054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13504210.1016/j.cej.2022.135042 ↗
3. Fan E, Li L, Wang Z, Lin J, Huang Y, Yao Y, Chen R, Wu F (2020) Sustainable recycling technology for Li-ion batteries and beyond: challenges and future prospects. Chem Rev 120:7020–7063. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0053510.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00535 ↗
4. Forse AC, Merlet C, Griffin JM, Grey CP (2016) New perspectives on the charging mechanisms of supercapacitors. J Am Chem Soc 138:5731–5744. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b0211510.1021/jacs.6b02115 ↗
5. Wang DG, Liang Z, Gao S, Qu C, Zou R (2020) Metal-organic framework-based materials for hybrid supercapacitor application. Coord Chem Rev 404:213093–213115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.21309310.1016/j.ccr.2019.213093 ↗
6. Gopalakrishnan A, Badhulika S (2020) Effect of self-doped heteroatoms on the performance of biomass-derived carbon for supercapacitor applications. J Power Sources 480:228830–228846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22883010.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228830 ↗
7. Sundriyal S, Kaur H, Bhardwaj SK, Mishra S, Kim KH, Deep A (2018) Metal-organic frameworks and their composites as efficient electrodes for supercapacitor applications. Coord Chem Rev 369:15–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.04.01810.1016/j.ccr.2018.04.018 ↗
8. Miao L, Song Z, Zhu D, Li L, Gan L, Liu M (2020) Recent advances in carbon-based supercapacitors. Mater Adv 1:945–966. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00384k10.1039/d0ma00384k ↗
9. Dubey R, Guruviah V (2019) Review of carbon-based electrode materials for supercapacitor energy storage. Ionics (Kiel) 25:1419–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-019-02874-010.1007/s11581-019-02874-0 ↗
10. Bose S, Kuila T, Mishra AK, Rajasekar R, Kim NH, Lee JH (2012) Carbon-based nanostructured materials and their composites as supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Chem 22:767–784. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm14468e10.1039/c1jm14468e ↗
11. Vinodh R, Gopi CVVM, Kummara VGR, Atchudan R, Ahamad T, Sambasivam S, Yi M, Obaidat IM, Kim HJ (2020) A review on porous carbon electrode material derived from hypercross-linked polymers for supercapacitor applications. J Energy Storage 32:101831–101850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.10183110.1016/j.est.2020.101831 ↗
12. Najib S, Erdem E (2019) Current progress achieved in novel materials for supercapacitor electrodes: mini review. Nanoscale Adv 1:2817–2827. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9na00345b10.1039/c9na00345b ↗
13. Shi Y, Liu G, Jin R, Xu H, Wang Q, Gao S (2019) Carbon materials from melamine sponges for supercapacitors and lithium battery electrode materials: a review. Carbon Energy 1:253–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.1910.1002/cey2.19 ↗
14. Simon P, Gogotsi Y (2008) Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat Mater 7:845–854. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat229710.1038/nmat2297 ↗
15. Zhang LL, Zhao XS (2009) Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 38(9):2520–2531. https://doi.org/10.1039/b813846j10.1039/b813846j ↗
16. Bharti A, Kumar G, Ahmed M, Gupta P, Bocchetta R, Adalati R, Chandra Y. Kumar (2021) Theories and models of supercapacitors with recent advancements: impact and interpretations. Nano Express. 2(2):022004–022031. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-959X/abf8c210.1088/2632-959X/abf8c2 ↗
17. Nasrabadi NM (2007) Pattern recognition and machine learning. J Electron Imaging 16:49901–49902. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.281911910.1117/1.2819119 ↗
18. Sawant V, Deshmukh R, Awati C (2023) Machine learning techniques for prediction of capacitance and remaining useful life of supercapacitors: a comprehensive review. J Energy Chem 77:438–451 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.11.01210.1016/j.jechem.2022.11.012 ↗
19. Adekoya GJ, Adekoya OC, Ugo UK, Sadiku ER, Hamam Y, Ray SS (2022) A mini-review of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting the performance of supercapacitors. Mater Today Proc 62:S184–S188 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.07910.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.079 ↗
20. Rahimi M, Fard MHA, Rohani A (2021) A multi-data-driven procedure towards a comprehensive understanding of the activated carbon electrodes performance (using for supercapacitor) employing ANN technique. Renew Energy. 180:980–992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.10210.1016/j.renene.2021.08.102 ↗
21. Liu P, Wen Y, Huang L, Zhu X, Wu R, Ai S, Xue T, Ge Y (2021) An emerging machine learning strategy for the assisted-design of high-performance supercapacitor materials by mining the relationship between capacitance and structural features of porous carbon. J Electroanal Chem 899:115684–115691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11568410.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115684 ↗
22. Gheytanzadeh M, Baghban A, Habibzadeh S, Mohaddespourd A, Abida O (2021) Insights into the estimation of capacitance for carbon-based supercapacitors. RSC Adv 11(10):5479–5486. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09837J10.1039/D0RA09837J ↗
23. Su H, Lin S, Deng S, Lian C, Shang Y, Liu H (2019) Predicting the capacitance of carbon-based electric double layer capacitors by machine learning. Nanoscale Adv. 1(6):2162–2166. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NA00105K10.1039/C9NA00105K ↗
24. Zhu S, Li J, Ma L, He C, Liu E, He F, Shi C, Zhao N (2018) Artificial neural network enabled capacitance prediction for carbon-based supercapacitors. Matter Lett 233:294–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.02810.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.028 ↗
25. Oladipo AA (2021) N, S, Co–doped biocarbon for supercapacitor application: effect of electrolytes concentration and modelling with artificial neural network. Mater Chem Phys 260:124129–124140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12412910.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124129 ↗
26. Rahimi M, Ab-Fard MH, Rohani A (2022) Synergetic effect of N/O functional groups and microstructures of activated carbon on supercapacitor performance by machine learning. J Power Sour 521:230968–230981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23096810.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230968 ↗
27. Schleder GR, Padilha ACM, Acosta CM, Costa M, Fazzio A (2019) From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science: a review. J Phys Mater 7:032001–032046. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
28. C. Kalil Tom And Wadia, Materials genome initiative for global competitiveness, genome. (2011) pp 1–18. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/materials_genome_initiative-final.pdf.
29. Zhu S, Li J, Ma L, He C, Liu E, He F, Shi C, Zhao N (2018) Machine learning enabled capacitance prediction for carbon-based supercapacitors. ChemRxiv. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.6222221.v210.26434/chemrxiv.6222221.v2 ↗
30. Copeland KAF (1997). Appl Linear Stat Models. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1997.1197976010.1080/00224065.1997.11979760 ↗
31. Shrinkage R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso author (s): robert tibshirani source. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58(1):267–28810.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
32. Grossi E, Buscema M (2007) Introduction to artificial neural networks. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f198a010.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f198a0 ↗
33. Farsi H, Gobal F (2007) Artificial neural network simulator for supercapacitor performance prediction. Comput Mater Sci 39:678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.08.02410.1016/j.commatsci.2006.08.024 ↗
34. Adetokun BB, Adekitan AI, Somefun TE, Aligbe A, Ogunjuyigbe ASO (2023) Artificial neural network-based capacitance prediction model for optimal voltage control of stand-alone wind-driven self-excited reluctance generator. https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerAfrica.2018.852099610.1109/PowerAfrica.2018.8520996 ↗
35. Bonfitto A, Feraco S, Tonoli A, Amati N, Monti F (2019) Estimation accuracy and computational cost analysis of artificial neural networks for state of charge estimation in lithium batteries. Batteries 5:47–63. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries502004710.3390/batteries5020047 ↗
36. Pasini A (2015) Artificial neural networks for small dataset analysis. J Thorac Dis 7:953–960. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.6110.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.04.61 ↗
37. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
38. Biau G (2012) Analysis of a random forests model. J Mach Learn Res 13:1063–1095
39. Ozsahin DU, Mustapha MT, Mubarak AS, Ameen ZS, Uzun B (2022) Impact of feature scaling on machine learning models for the diagnosis of diabetes. In: International conference on artificial intelligence in everything, pp 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIE57029.2022.00024.10.1109/AIE57029.2022.00024 ↗
40. Chmiola J, Yushin G, Gogotsi Y, Portet C, Simon P, Taberna PL (2006) Anomalous increase in carbon capacitance at pore sizes less than 1 nanometer. Science 313(80):1760–1763. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.113219510.1126/science.1132195 ↗