4D-printed PLA-PETG polymer blends: comprehensive analysis of thermal, mechanical, and shape memory performances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer composites and self-healing · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Megdich A, Habibi M, Laperriere L (2023) A review on 4D printing: material structures, stimuli and additive manufacturing techniques. Mater Lett 337:133977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13397710.1016/j.matlet.2023.133977 ↗
2. Kouka MA et al (2023) 4D printing of shape memory polymers, blends, and composites and their advanced applications: a comprehensive literature review. Adv Eng Mater 25(4):2200650. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20220065010.1002/adem.202200650 ↗
3. Momeni F, Liu X, Ni J (2017) A review of 4D printing. Mater Des 122:42–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.06810.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.068 ↗
4. Chu H et al (2020) 4D printing: a review on recent progresses. Micromachines 11(9):796. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1109079610.3390/mi11090796 ↗
5. Sunte J (2022) A review on 4D–printing design materials. Int J Sci Res Mech Mater Eng 6(3):19
6. Spiegel CA et al (2020) 4D printing at the microscale. Adv Func Mater 30(26):1907615. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190761510.1002/adfm.201907615 ↗
7. Soleyman E et al (2022) Assessment of controllable shape transformation, potential applications, and tensile shape memory properties of 3D printed PETG. J Market Res 18:4201–4215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.07610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.076 ↗
8. Miao S et al (2019) 4D anisotropic skeletal muscle tissue constructs fabricated by staircase effect strategy. Biofabrication 11(3):035030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab1d0710.1088/1758-5090/ab1d07 ↗
9. Peng B et al (2020) Fused filament fabrication 4D printing of a highly extensible, self-healing, shape memory elastomer based on thermoplastic polymer blends. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(11):12777–12788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c1861810.1021/acsami.0c18618 ↗
10. Lin C et al (2022) 4D printing of shape memory polybutylene succinate/polylactic acid (PBS/PLA) and its potential applications. Compos Struct 279:114729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11472910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114729 ↗
11. Rahmatabadi D et al (2023) 4D printing of PLA-TPU blends: effect of PLA concentration, loading mode, and programming temperature on the shape memory effect. J Mater Sci. 58(16):7227–7243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08460-010.1007/s10853-023-08460-0 ↗
12. Nagarajan V, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2016) Perspective on polylactic acid (PLA) based sustainable materials for durable applications: focus on toughness and heat resistance. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(6):2899–2916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0032110.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00321 ↗
13. Tümer EH, Erbil HY (2021) Extrusion-based 3D printing applications of PLA composites: a review. Coatings 11(4):390. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1104039010.3390/coatings11040390 ↗
14. Kechagias J et al (2023) A multi-parametric process evaluation of the mechanical response of PLA in FFF 3D printing. Mater Manuf Processes 38(8):941–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.208989510.1080/10426914.2022.2089895 ↗
15. Bragaglia M et al (2023) Modeling the fracture behavior of 3D-printed PLA as a laminate composite: influence of printing parameters on failure and mechanical properties. Compos Struct 322:117379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11737910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117379 ↗
16. Deka M et al (2024) A review on surface modification of materials for 3D printed diagnostic devices. Anal Methods 16:485–495. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AY01742G10.1039/D3AY01742G ↗
17. Ren Z et al (2024) Advancing multi-stimuli 4D printing of polylactic acid with rapid shape memory and enhanced toughness using lignin-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Ind Crops Prod 208:117809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11780910.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117809 ↗
18. Ziadia A, Habibi M, Kelouwani S (2023) Machine learning study of the effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FFF PLA and PLA-CF. Eng 4(4):2741–2763. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng404015610.3390/eng4040156 ↗
19. Song JJ, Chang HH, Naguib HE (2015) Design and characterization of biocompatible shape memory polymer (SMP) blend foams with a dynamic porous structure. Polymer 56:82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.06210.1016/j.polymer.2014.09.062 ↗
20. Guo Y et al (2020) TPU/PLA nanocomposites with improved mechanical and shape memory properties fabricated via phase morphology control and incorporation of multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanofillers. Polym Eng Sci 60(6):1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2536510.1002/pen.25365 ↗
21. Azadi F et al (2021) Influence of graphene oxide on thermally induced shape memory behavior of PLA/TPU blends: correlation with morphology, creep behavior, crystallinity, and dynamic mechanical properties. Macromol Mater Eng 306(2):2000576. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20200057610.1002/mame.202000576 ↗
22. da Cunha RB et al (2023) 4D printing of shape memory polylactic acid/ethylene-glycidyl methacrylate (PLA/E-GMA) blends. Smart Mater Struct 32(9):095015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aceae510.1088/1361-665X/aceae5 ↗
23. da Cunha RB et al (2023) Development of shape memory polylactic acid/ethylene-butyl acrylate-maleic anhydride (PLA/EBA-MAH) blends for 4D printing applications. J Polym Environ. 32(3):1423–1438. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aceae510.1088/1361-665X/aceae5 ↗
24. Arabiyat AS et al (2021) Intrinsic osteoinductivity of PCL-DA/PLLA semi-IPN shape memory polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 109(11):2334–2345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3721610.1002/jbm.a.37216 ↗
25. Park JY et al (2012) Compatibility and physical properties of poly (lactic acid)/poly (ethylene terephthalate glycol) blends. Macromol Res 20:1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-012-0203-210.1007/s13233-012-0203-2 ↗
26. Ibrahim BA, Kadum KM (2010) Influence of polymer blending on mechanical and thermal properties. Mod Appl Sci 4(9):15710.5539/mas.v4n9p157 ↗
27. Charasseangpaisarn T et al (2023) Development of poly (methyl methacrylate)/poly (lactic acid) blend as sustainable biomaterial for dental applications. Sci Rep 13(1):16904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44150-210.1038/s41598-023-44150-2 ↗
28. Nishi T, Wang T (1975) Melting point depression and kinetic effects of cooling on crystallization in poly (vinylidene fluoride)-poly (methyl methacrylate) mixtures. Macromolecules 8(6):909–915. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60048a04010.1021/ma60048a040 ↗
29. Kattan M et al (2001) Strain-induced crystallization in uniaxially drawn PETG plates. J Appl Polym Sci 81(14):3405–3412. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.179710.1002/app.1797 ↗
30. Es-Said OS et al (2000) Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater Manuf Processes 15(1):107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/1042691000891297610.1080/10426910008912976 ↗
31. Song Y et al (2017) Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 123:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.05110.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 ↗
32. Wang L, Gramlich WM, Gardner DJ (2017) Improving the impact strength of Poly (lactic acid)(PLA) in fused layer modeling (FLM). Polymer 114:242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.01110.1016/j.polymer.2017.03.011 ↗
33. Khosravani MR et al (2022) Characterization of 3D-printed PLA parts with different raster orientations and printing speeds. Sci Rep 12(1):1016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05005-410.1038/s41598-022-05005-4 ↗
34. Letcher TB, Rankouhi SJ (2015) Experimental study of mechanical properties of additively manufactured ABS plastic as a function of layer parameters. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers 57359:V02AT02A018. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2015-5263410.1115/IMECE2015-52634 ↗
35. Tymrak B, Kreiger M, Pearce JM (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
36. Bellini A, Güçeri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 9(4):252–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254031048963110.1108/13552540310489631 ↗
37. Ahn SH et al (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8(4):248–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
38. Rankouhi B et al (2016) Failure analysis and mechanical characterization of 3D printed ABS with respect to layer thickness and orientation. J Fail Anal Prev 16:467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-016-0113-310.1007/s11668-016-0113-3 ↗
39. Sepahi MT et al (2021) Mechanical properties of 3D-printed parts made of polyethylene terephthalate glycol. J Mater Eng Perform 30:6851–6861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06032-410.1007/s11665-021-06032-4 ↗
40. Akhoundi B, Behravesh AH (2019) Effect of filling pattern on the tensile and flexural mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed products. Exp Mech 59:883–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y10.1007/s11340-018-00467-y ↗
41. Kuznetsov VE et al (2020) Increasing strength of FFF three-dimensional printed parts by influencing on temperature-related parameters of the process. Rapid Prototyp J 26(1):107–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-001710.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0017 ↗
42. Yakacki CM et al (2008) Strong, tailored, biocompatible shape-memory polymer networks. Adv Func Mater 18(16):2428–2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20070104910.1002/adfm.200701049 ↗
43. Xu J, Song J (2015) Polylactic acid (PLA)-based shape-memory materials for biomedical applications. In: Akila A (ed) Shape memory polymers for biomedical applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-85709-698-2.00010-610.1016/B978-0-85709-698-2.00010-6 ↗
44. Xia Y et al (2021) A review of shape memory polymers and composites: mechanisms, materials, and applications. Adv Mater 33(6):2000713. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200071310.1002/adma.202000713 ↗
45. Strutynski C et al (2023) 4D Optical fibers based on shape-memory polymers. Nat Commun 14(1):6561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42355-710.1038/s41467-023-42355-7 ↗
46. Li G, Wang A (2016) Cold, warm, and hot programming of shape memory polymers. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 54(14):1319–1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2404110.1002/polb.24041 ↗
47. Rolińska K, Bakhshi H, Balk M, Blocki A, Panwar A, Puchalski M, Mazurek-Budzyńska M (2023) Electrospun Poly (carbonate-urea-urethane) s Nonwovens with Shape-Memory Properties as a Potential Biomaterial. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 9(12):6683–6697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c0121410.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01214 ↗
48. Wang A, Li G (2015) Stress memory of a thermoset shape memory polymer. J Appl Polym Sci. 132. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4211210.1002/app.42112 ↗
49. Soleyman E et al (2022) Shape memory performance of PETG 4D printed parts under compression in cold, warm, and hot programming. Smart Mater Struct 31(8):085002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ac77cb10.1088/1361-665X/ac77cb ↗
50. Wu J et al (2016) Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 6(1):24224. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2422410.1038/srep24224 ↗
51. Ahmed HI et al (2021) Development of 3D auxetic structures using para-aramid and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene yarns. J Text Inst 112(9):1417–1427. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.181900710.1080/00405000.2020.1819007 ↗
52. Choong YYC et al (2017) 4D printing of high performance shape memory polymer using stereolithography. Mater Des 126:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.0410.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.04 ↗
53. Bashandeh K et al (2020) Mechanics and deformation of shape memory polymer kirigami microstructures. Extreme Mech Lett 39:100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2020.10083110.1016/j.eml.2020.100831 ↗